Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Pension Glide Path: Avoid Savings Crash - News Directory 3

Pension Glide Path: Avoid Savings Crash

July 9, 2025 Victoria Sterling Business
News Context
At a glance
Original source: ft.com

The Perils of⁣ Pension Default Funds: Why You Need to ⁤Take Control

Table of Contents

  • The Perils of⁣ Pension Default Funds: Why You Need to ⁤Take Control
    • The Glide Path: A Risky Descent?
    • Why Default Funds Fall short
      • Are You a Default Fund Misfit?
    • Taking Control: Customizing Your Investment Strategy
    • The UK Private Asset Question

“To⁢ make it easy and frictionless for people to join pension schemes,” says⁢ Jesal Mistry, head of DC investment governance at Legal & General Investment Management. “They are designed ⁣to cater to as broad a group of people ⁣as possible.” While auto-enrolment and default ‍funds have undeniably boosted pension saving, a critical look reveals a potential flaw: a one-size-fits-all approach that may not suit everyone. This ⁤article explores the limitations of default funds and⁣ why taking control of your pension investments is more important than⁢ ever.

The Glide Path: A Risky Descent?

Pensions companies⁤ typically employ a “glide path,” gradually shifting investments from possibly ⁢high-growth equities to⁣ safer, but⁣ lower-yielding, bonds as ⁤investors approach retirement. This strategy aims‍ to protect accumulated savings from market volatility. Though, the analogy of a glide path is surprisingly⁣ apt – a poorly calculated descent can end in a crash.

Research from the Pensions Policy institute (disclosure: I’m a trustee of this charity,⁢ my views are my ⁣own) illustrates this shift. Typically, a default fund ⁢investor might have two-thirds of their money in equities 20 years from retirement. By their chosen retirement date, that figure flips to ⁤two-thirds in bonds and cash. ⁤While ‍seemingly sensible, this de-risking ‍process isn’t ‍universally optimal.

Why Default Funds Fall short

auto-enrolment has ⁣successfully encouraged widespread pension participation, and default funds offer⁣ a convenient option⁢ for⁢ those who lack the time, knowledge, or inclination to manage their own investments. Though, their inherent generality⁣ is a meaningful drawback.

Recent adjustments to accommodate the abolition of compulsory annuities and ⁢the rise of drawdown products haven’t fully addressed the issue. Many default funds still reduce equity exposure too aggressively as we age, potentially sacrificing⁣ long-term growth. This⁢ is especially problematic for individuals with⁢ specific circumstances.

Are You a Default Fund Misfit?

Consider these scenarios:

Substantial Backup Assets: If you have a defined⁢ benefit pension or plan to sell a business, ⁢you may be comfortable maintaining ‍higher equity exposure for continued growth.
Health & Financial Situation: Conversely, poor health or limited financial resources might warrant a faster shift to ⁤lower-risk investments, even ahead of planned retirement. Individual Risk Tolerance: A default fund cannot accurately assess your⁣ personal appetite for risk.

These examples highlight why blindly accepting a default fund’s⁣ glide path can ‍be detrimental. It’s crucial to remember that retirement planning isn’t a standardized process; it’s deeply⁢ personal.

Taking Control: Customizing Your Investment Strategy

Don’t succumb to inertia. Actively ⁢review the specifications of your default fund.⁤ most pension providers⁢ allow you to adjust your glide path by modifying ⁢the retirement ‍age you specify – this⁢ doesn’t necessarily need‍ to align with your actual retirement date.⁤ Extending the timeframe can maintain higher equity exposure for longer.

Alternatively,you can move your money out of the default ⁢fund entirely ‍and⁢ invest in options you believe are more suitable.⁤ I personally took this route with an older workplace scheme, finding ‍the bond allocation accelerated too quickly⁢ for ⁣my needs.

The UK Private Asset Question

The government⁢ is increasingly encouraging investment in UK private assets.However,I remain sceptical. Costs‍ are often high,and historical performance data can be⁣ unreliable. Concerns around illiquidity and concentrated market exposure further fuel my hesitation.

Furthermore, I’m wary of political pressure to invest in specific asset classes. Unless convincingly persuaded or else, ⁤I intend to opt⁢ out ⁤of default funds‍ and pursue a more tailored investment strategy. I’m not alone in⁢ this sentiment,and a growing ⁤number of informed investors are questioning the blanket approach ⁤to pension investment.

Jonathan Guthrie‍ is a ‍writer, an adviser⁤ and a former head of Lex; jonathanbuchananguthrie@gmail.com*

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Worth a look

  • لولو يفتتح متجرًا جديدًا في الحيل بسلطنة عمان
  • Toluna Bina Combines AI Personas and Real Consumer Research

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com