Police to Reapply for Arrest Warrant for Kim Sung-hoon Today
경찰, 윤석열 대통령 체포 방해 혐의 김성훈 경호처 차장에 4번째 구속영장 신청
Table of Contents
- 경찰, 윤석열 대통령 체포 방해 혐의 김성훈 경호처 차장에 4번째 구속영장 신청
- Inquiry into Alleged Obstruction of President Yoon Suk-yeol’s Arrest: Q&A
- Key Questions and Answers:
- 1. Why is the police seeking an arrest warrant for kim Seong-hoon, Deputy chief of the Presidential Security Service?
- 2. What is the current status of the investigation?
- 3. What has been the prosecution’s stance on the arrest warrants previously?
- 4. Has the impeachment trial verdict affected the re-application for the arrest warrant?
- 5.Where has Deputy chief kim Seong-hoon been during this time, and what does this imply for Presidential Security?
- 6. Why is the secure phone server so critically important to the investigation?
- 7. Was there a leak of internal details from the Security Service to the police?
- 8. What will be the impact of Chief Woo Jong-soo’s retirement on the investigation?
- Summary Table: Key Figures and Arrest Warrant Status
- Conclusion:
- Key Questions and Answers:
On March 17, 2025, the police are seeking a fourth arrest warrant for Kim Seong-hoon, the Deputy Chief of the presidential Security Service, on charges of obstructing the arrest of President Yoon Suk-yeol. This advancement marks a notable point in the ongoing investigation.
수사 진행 상황 (Investigation Progress)
A representative from the National Police Agency’s Special Investigation Unit (특수단) stated during a briefing that the paperwork for the arrest warrant applications for Deputy Chief Kim and Chief Guard Lee Kwang-woo is being finalized. The plan is to submit these applications to the prosecution by the afternoon. The police investigation is focused on the events surrounding the alleged obstruction.
검찰의 이전 결정 (Previous Decisions by the Prosecution)
Previously, the prosecution had rejected the police’s requests for arrest warrants for Deputy chief Kim and Chief Lee a total of three and two times, respectively, on charges including obstruction of special public duty execution. Though,on June 6,the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office Warrant Review Committee concluded that it was reasonable for the prosecution to request arrest warrants for them. The arrest warrant process has been fraught with challenges.
Police have been conducting supplementary investigations targeting security service officials, refining the reasons why the detention of former deputy Chief Kim and others is necessary.
탄핵 심판과의 관련성 부인 (Denial of Connection with impeachment Trial)
Regarding speculation that the delay in re-application was related to the timing of the impeachment trial verdict, it was dismissed as “전혀 관계없다” (fully unrelated).
대통령 경호 상황 (Presidential Security Situation)
It has been reported that Deputy Chief Kim has been staying at the Hannam residence as President Yoon’s release, providing close protection. The Presidential Security detail is under scrutiny.
보안폰 서버 확보 필요성 강조 (Emphasis on Securing Secure Phone Server)
Police have repeatedly emphasized the need to secure the secure phone (비화폰) server held by the Presidential Security Service to forensically analyze call records. given that Deputy chief Kim did not approve the search and seizure of the server,the investigation could be reopened if Deputy Chief kim’s custody is secured.
내부 정보 유출 의혹 부인 (Denial of Internal Facts Leakage Allegations)
Regarding reports that the security service disciplined an employee for allegedly leaking internal information to the National Police Agency, a police official refuted, “(경호처) 내부 정보 이야기는 나누지 않은 것으로 안다” (I don’t believe any internal security service information was shared). In connection with this, National Police Agency Chief Woo Jong-soo told reporters, “특별수사팀이 정치적 중립성을 최대한 지켰다고 생각한다” (“I believe the special investigation team maintained political neutrality to the greatest extent possible”).
Chief Woo, who is retiring on the 28th, emphasized, “누구 한 명이 빠진다고 해서 수사가 흔들릴 만큼 허약하지 않다” (“The investigation is not so weak that it will be shaken by the departure of one person”), stating that the strict investigation stance on the martial law situation will be maintained.
Inquiry into Alleged Obstruction of President Yoon Suk-yeol’s Arrest: Q&A
This article delves into the ongoing investigation surrounding allegations that Kim Seong-hoon, the Deputy Chief of the Presidential Security Service, obstructed the arrest of President Yoon Suk-yeol. we will explore the key questions, providing context and insights into this complex legal and political situation.
Key Questions and Answers:
1. Why is the police seeking an arrest warrant for kim Seong-hoon, Deputy chief of the Presidential Security Service?
The police are seeking a fourth arrest warrant for Kim Seong-hoon on charges of obstructing the arrest of President Yoon Suk-yeol. This implies that Mr. Kim is suspected of actively preventing or hindering law enforcement from apprehending the president.
2. What is the current status of the investigation?
As of March 17, 2025, the National Police Agency’s Special Investigation Unit is finalizing paperwork for arrest warrant applications for both Deputy Chief Kim Seong-hoon and Chief Guard Lee Kwang-woo. These applications are planned to be submitted to the prosecution. The police investigation is focusing on the specific events that constitute the alleged obstruction.
3. What has been the prosecution’s stance on the arrest warrants previously?
The prosecution has previously rejected the police’s requests for arrest warrants for Deputy Chief Kim Seong-hoon and Chief Lee Kwang-woo. Specifically,the requests were rejected three times for Deputy Chief Kim and two times for Chief Lee,on charges including obstruction of special public duty execution. However, the Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office Warrant Review Committee on June 6th concluded that it was reasonable for the prosecution to request arrest warrants for them, creating conflicting signals.
4. Has the impeachment trial verdict affected the re-application for the arrest warrant?
No. Authorities have dismissed speculation that the delay in re-applying for the arrest warrant was related to the timing of the impeachment trial verdict, stating it was “fully unrelated.”
5.Where has Deputy chief kim Seong-hoon been during this time, and what does this imply for Presidential Security?
Deputy Chief Kim Seong-hoon has reportedly been staying at the Hannam residence, providing close protection to President Yoon. This places the Presidential Security detail under scrutiny, given that the Deputy Chief is under investigation for possibly obstructing justice related to the President’s arrest.
6. Why is the secure phone server so critically important to the investigation?
The police have repeatedly emphasized the need to secure the secure phone (비화폰) server held by the Presidential Security Service. This is as the server contains call records that could provide crucial evidence related to the alleged obstruction. The fact that Deputy Chief Kim has not approved the search and seizure of the server further intensifies the need to pursue the warrant. Securing the server would allow for a forensic analysis of communication records.
7. Was there a leak of internal details from the Security Service to the police?
A police official refuted reports that the security service disciplined an employee for allegedly leaking internal information to the National Police Agency, stating, “I don’t believe any internal security service information was shared.” Furthermore, National Police Agency Chief Woo Jong-soo stated that the special investigation team has maintained political neutrality.
8. What will be the impact of Chief Woo Jong-soo’s retirement on the investigation?
Chief Woo Jong-soo, who is retiring on the 28th, emphasized that “The investigation is not so weak that it will be shaken by the departure of one person.” He also stated that the strict investigation stance will be maintained, suggesting that the investigation’s integrity will remain despite his departure.
Summary Table: Key Figures and Arrest Warrant Status
| Official | Position | Arrest Warrant Status |
|—————–|————————————–|——————————————————-|
| Kim Seong-hoon | Deputy Chief, Security Service | 4th Arrest Warrant Application Pending |
| Lee Kwang-woo | Chief Guard | Prior Arrest Warrant Requests Rejected Two Times |
Conclusion:
The investigation surrounding Deputy Chief Kim Seong-hoon and the alleged obstruction of President Yoon Suk-yeol’s arrest is a complex matter. The repeated rejection of arrest warrants by the prosecution, the ongoing need to secure the secure phone server, and the presence of Deputy Chief Kim in close proximity to the President all contribute to the intrigue of the unfolding events. The investigation’s persistence, even with the impending retirement of key personnel, highlights the seriousness of the allegations and the determination to uncover the truth.