Political Views Impact Scientist Trust

Back to Healio

The “clear ideological gradient” researchers observed underscores the need for tailored messaging to ensure evidence-based cancer information reaches diverse audiences, Christopher W. Wheldon, PhD, assistant professor ‍of social and behavioral sciences at Temple University’s Barnett College of Public Health, and colleagues concluded.

“The patterns we observed likely reflect how people feel about institutions, not whether they care⁤ about their own health or whether they trust the scientific process,” Wheldon told Healio. “Those institutions have a responsibility to deliver scientifically and medically accurate‍ information about cancer prevention, screening ⁢and care. ‍They may⁤ need to frame that information so it resonates with different communities, which may require different communication strategies.”

Broad potential impacts

A growing volume of evidence suggests political ideology may be an crucial determinant of health behaviors.

COVID-19 pandemic-era debates about public health mandates – including mask and vaccine requirements – represent one⁤ example.

A study by Chido-Amajuoyi and colleagues, published in 2023, examined whether political ideology affected trust in public health ⁣agencies for cancer information. As Healio previously reported, individuals with more conservative political views ‍had lower levels of trust in⁢ cancer‍ information disseminated ⁤by these entities than people ‍with more liberal views.

Whether political polarization in the United States affects public trust in scientific authorities had not been established.

Wheldon and colleagues conducted a⁢ cross-sectional secondary analysis of the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey, a nationally representative survey conducted by NCI that assesses ⁢the American public’s knowledge of, attitudes toward and use of information related to⁣ cancer and othre health topics.

The survey asked respondents: “In general, how much would you trust information about cancer from scientists?”

researchers classified respondents who selected “some” or “a lot” as having high trust. They classified respondents who selected “a little” or “not at all” as having low trust.

Survey‍ respondents also described their current political viewpoint. A 7-point bipolar scale offered a range of “very liberal” to “very conservative,” with “moderate” as a midpoint.

Researchers used survey-weighted logistic regression models to estimate associations between trust and political⁤ ideology.

More than 7,200 people responded to⁤ the survey.

Investigators included ‍6,260 (52.1% men)⁢ with complete data in their analysis. They controlled for several variables, including age, ⁣education and family cancer history.

A majority of respondents (86%) reported high trust in scientists as⁣ sources of cancer information.

“The high level of trust overall surprised me,” Wheldon said. “Despite increasing political polarization, most people ‍across the ideological spectrum still reported high trust⁣ in scientists ⁢for cancer information.”

Adjusted logistic ⁢regression models showed‍ trust varied⁤ by politi

Okay, I understand. I will⁤ adhere to all instructions⁤ meticulously, prioritizing accuracy, verifiability,⁣ and a⁢ human-quality newsroom voice.

Please provide the text you want ‍me ‍to process. I am ready to begin once you paste it here.