Here’s a breakdown of the text provided, focusing on the key arguments and points:
Main Topic: debate surrounding the use of E-ID (Electronic Identification) for youth protection, specifically regarding access to pornography.
Key Arguments:
* Pro-E-ID (Nik Gugger): believes E-ID is the best available solution for increased youth protection in the near future.
* opponent of E-ID (Amgwerd): While acknowledging the problem of youth access to pornography, argues that E-ID isn’t a complete solution. She points out that content exists outside of platforms that would be subject to ID checks.
* Amgwerd’s Proposed Solutions:
* Parental Supervision: Parents need to more actively monitor their children’s internet use.
* Education: Increased education is needed about the “real consequences of filmed prostitution.” She frames the issue as a broader “inflationary consumption of pornography” that is a social problem.
In essence, the article highlights a disagreement on how best to protect young people from harmful online content. One side favors a technological solution (E-ID), while the other emphasizes parental responsibility and education.
