Pomárico’s Lawyer: Arrest Warrant Exaggerated
- BARRANQUILLA, Colombia – A legal battle is unfolding concerning Alberto David Pomarico Ramos, the former mayor of Plato, Magdalena, after his arrest on March 25.
- The situation is complicated by conflicting court decisions.
- He argued that if the judge believed the initial arrest was unlawful, the appropriate action would have been too overturn the first judge's decision, not to order a...
Legal Wrangling Continues for Former Mayor in Colombia
Table of Contents
- Legal Wrangling Continues for Former Mayor in Colombia
- Legal Wrangling Continues for Former Mayor in Colombia
- What is the Legal Case About?
- what are the Conflicting Court Rulings?
- Why is the Defense Arguing Against the Detention?
- What is a Safe-Conduct Permit and How is it Relevant?
- Where Did the arrest Take Place?
- What allegedly Happened during the incident?
- What is the Attorney’s Stance on the Weapon’s Use?
- Key Arguments and Points of Contention
- Summary of Key Facts Regarding the Case
BARRANQUILLA, Colombia – A legal battle is unfolding concerning Alberto David Pomarico Ramos, the former mayor of Plato, Magdalena, after his arrest on March 25. The arrest, which took place inside the Notario Quinta de Barranquilla where Pomarico ramos also served as a notary (e), involved allegations of illegal weapon possession.
Conflicting Court Rulings
The situation is complicated by conflicting court decisions. Initially, Pomarico Ramos’s attorney, Jorge Hazbún, secured a ruling that deemed the arrest illegal. However,on Friday,April 25,another judge overturned that decision,declaring the arrest legal and issuing a detention order.
defense Argues Against Detention
Hazbún criticized the latest arrest warrant. He argued that if the judge believed the initial arrest was unlawful, the appropriate action would have been too overturn the first judge’s decision, not to order a new arrest. Hazbún emphasized Pomarico Ramos’s good character, lack of criminal history, and the fact that the weapon in question had a safe-conduct permit. He stated they were prepared to address the charges and any necesary measures.
That arrest warrant seems exaggerated to me… she lacks a history, the weapon has safe -conduct and we would have submitted it for the imputation and the assurance measure.
Jorge Hazbún, Attorney for Alberto David Pomarico Ramos
Legal Interpretation of Safe-Conduct
Hazbún further argued that according to a recent court judgment (Feb. 19, 2025), the mere presence of a weapon with a safe-conduct permit, even if stored, does not constitute illegal firearm carrying if there is no intent to use it unlawfully. He claims this was his primary argument against the legality of the arrest.
Details of the Arrest
The arrest occurred at the Notario Quinta de Barranquilla, located at race 55 number 72-35.Reports indicate the incident stemmed from a dispute over the signing of a public deed. Allegedly, Pomarico Ramos brandished a .38 caliber revolver during an argument.
Weapon Stored, Not Displayed, Claims Attorney
According to Hazbún, the weapon was stored in a desk drawer and was never used to intimidate anyone during the discussion. He suggested that the situation might warrant an administrative sanction related to the safe-conduct permit, but not criminal charges.
It is more here what comes in is an administrative sanction if the safe -conduct was defeated and not a criminal sanction.
Jorge Hazbún, Attorney for Alberto David Pomarico Ramos
Legal Wrangling Continues for Former Mayor in Colombia
What is the Legal Case About?
The legal case concerns Alberto David Pomarico Ramos, former mayor of Plato, Magdalena, Colombia. He was arrested on March 25th, adn the primary allegation involves illegal weapon possession. The arrest took place at the Notario Quinta de Barranquilla,where Pomarico Ramos also worked as a notary.
what are the Conflicting Court Rulings?
The legal situation is complicated by disagreements in the court. Pomarico Ramos’s attorney, Jorge Hazbún, initially secured a ruling that deemed the arrest unlawful.However, on April 25th, another judge overturned this decision, declaring the arrest legal and issuing a detention order.
Why is the Defense Arguing Against the Detention?
Hazbún argues that if the initial arrest was deemed unlawful, the appropriate course of action should have been to overturn the first decision, not to order a new arrest. He highlights Pomarico Ramos’s good character, lack of a criminal record, and the fact that the weapon in question had a safe-conduct permit.
What is a Safe-Conduct Permit and How is it Relevant?
A safe-conduct permit allows an individual to legally possess a firearm. Hazbún argues that the mere presence of a weapon with a safe-conduct permit,stored without intent to use it unlawfully,does not constitute illegal firearm carrying. He references a recent court judgment from February 19, 2025, to support this claim.
Where Did the arrest Take Place?
The arrest occurred at the notario Quinta de Barranquilla, located at Race 55, number 72-35 in Barranquilla, Colombia.
What allegedly Happened during the incident?
Reports indicate the arrest stemmed from a dispute over the signing of a public deed. It is indeed alleged that Pomarico Ramos brandished a .38 caliber revolver during the argument.
What is the Attorney’s Stance on the Weapon’s Use?
Hazbún claims the weapon was stored in a desk drawer and not used to intimidate anyone during the discussion.He suggests that the situation might warrant an administrative sanction related to the safe-conduct permit, but not criminal charges.
Key Arguments and Points of Contention
Here’s a summary of the key arguments and points of contention in the case:
- Initial Ruling: The first court ruling deemed the arrest illegal.
- Overturned Ruling: A subsequent ruling declared the arrest legal and issued a detention order.
- Defense’s Argument: Attorney Hazbún argues the detention is unwarranted, given his client’s good character and the weapon’s safe-conduct permit.
- Weapon’s Location: The weapon was reportedly stored in a desk drawer.
- Allegation: Pomarico Ramos allegedly brandished the weapon during a dispute over a public deed.
- defense Claim: Hazbún stated that the situation might only warrant an administrative sanction, not criminal charges.
Summary of Key Facts Regarding the Case
To provide a concise overview, here’s a summary of the main facts:
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Defendant | Alberto David Pomarico Ramos, former mayor |
| Charges | Allegations of illegal weapon possession |
| Location of Arrest | Notario Quinta de Barranquilla |
| Attorney | Jorge Hazbún |
| Weapon | .38 caliber revolver, with a safe-conduct permit |
| Key Argument | Weapon stored, not used to intimidate |
| Legal Standing | Conflicting court rulings on the legality of the arrest |