Peru’s political landscape is increasingly tumultuous, with three of the four leading banks constituting the parliamentary leadership choosing not to support the dismissal of Peru’s Minister of the Interior, Juan José Santiváñez, despite a series of high-profile incidents. Critics point to a rise in homicides since early 2025, including a recent explosive attack on the Public Ministry’s headquarters in Trujillo. There are also allegations that Santiváñez has blundered, wrongly accusing citizens and criminal networks where there were none.

Alliance for Progress (APP) and the Muted Political Game

In a statement to El Comercio, Luis Valdez, the General Secretary of Alliance for Progress (APP), clarified that his group will not endorse the motion of censure at this time. This means that the parliamentarians of APP will initially abstain from signing the documents for the purported dismissal of the minister.

“If the signatures are gathered, we will evaluate the charges, and so forth. Congress member Susel Paredes hasn’t presented the foundations [of her motion],” said Valdez.

In an interview with El Comercio, Valdez denied claims of political cover. He emphasized that the position, as taken by the Alliance for Progress, is due to the absence of a comprehensive document substantiating the accusations. “It’s not a cover,” he stated. “Those who raise this motion haven’t had the care to convey the foundations. It’s not about raising just to raise, but about building a consensus.”

The Mole Inside to Honduran Editor Against Santiváñez

The former President of the Congress took a nuanced stance on the perceived incompetency within the Interior Ministry concerning the spike in criminality throughout the nation. “I’d suggest that ’security in the country’ has many stakeholders—the judiciary, prosecution offices, government institutions, and the Minister of State, merging their opinions.”

The Top Internal Power Group

Understanding Peru’s Political Turmoil

Peru has been grappling with a complex political situation. Three of the country’s leading banks, part of the parliamentary leadership, have refrained from supporting the dismissal of the Minister of the Interior, Juan José Santiváñez, despite allegations against him and rising criminal incidents.[[SOURCE]

Q: Why has the political stance on Santiváñez’s tenure been muted?

The muted response from these banks and political entities can be attributed to several factors,including the absence of a comprehensive motion substantiating the charges against Santiváñez. Luis Valdez, General Secretary of the Alliance for Progress, emphasized that a complete document outlining the accusations is necessary before making decisions. This stance indicates caution and a demand for clarity among Peru’s political stakeholders.[[SOURCE]

Q: What is the role of the Alliance for Progress (APP) in this controversy?

The Alliance for Progress has chosen not to endorse the motion of censure against the Minister of the Interior, taking an impartial stand and awaiting the presentation of concrete evidence. Luis Valdez stated in an interview that APP’s decision is rooted in the absence of a detailed presentation of the allegations, highlighting their commitment to building consensus rather than acting precipitously.[[SOURCE]

Q: What are the allegations against Minister Santiváñez?

Minister Santiváñez faces allegations of mishandling his role, including a purported rise in violent incidents, such as an attack on the Public Ministry’s headquarters in Trujillo. Additionally, there are accusations of misidentifying citizens and criminal networks without proper grounds. These allegations have sparked calls for his removal, though ample proof remains absent.[[SOURCE]

• Rise in homicides since early 2025
• Explosive attack on the Public Ministry in Trujillo
• Accusations of wrongful attribution of crime

Q: What is Santiváñez’s response to the allegations?

Santiváñez has expressed regret over the state of government stability and public policy infrastructure, acknowledging the challenges his ministry faces. He emphasizes that as a minister, his actions are bound by congressional policies, and decisions regarding his tenure should rest with Congress.[[SOURCE]

Q: How is the Popular Force party responding?

Sources from Popular force’s leadership reported no defined political stance regarding Santiváñez’s tenure due to internal issues within the party. they anticipate addressing broader parliamentary agendas with the new legislature’s onset, sidestepping direct commentary on the current ministerial situation.[[SOURCE]

Q: What broader issues are affecting Peru’s political stability?

The political analyst Jeffrey Radzinsky pointed out that slow legislative processes and persistent delays in implementing measures in the Ministry of the Interior contribute to destabilization. This inefficiency, coupled with the Ministry of Armed Forces’ challenges, highlights the systemic issues within Peru’s political and governance frameworks.[[SOURCE]

Implications for Future Political Dynamics

The ongoing situation with Minister Santiváñez and the reaction of various political entities suggests that Peru is in a complex period of navigating its governance strategies. The need for consensus-building and thorough scrutiny of motions before decisive actions is evident. These dynamics are critical for Peru’s path forward in achieving political stability and addressing underlying governance issues.[[SOURCE]