Here’s a breakdown of the key facts from the text, focusing on the conflict and accusations:
The Core Conflict:
Antonella Carranza, daughter of Puma Carranza, is publicly accusing her ex-partner, footballer Carlo Diez, of attempting to reduce the court-ordered child support payments for their son. She alleges he’s doing this by falsely claiming a lower salary.
Key Accusations & Details:
* False Salary Claims: Carranza claims Diez is repeatedly stating a lower salary than he actually earns, hoping to decrease his financial obligation. She says she has proof of his actual income.
* Involvement of a Sports Journalist: She accuses Diez of being advised by a married sports journalist (who also works for Cienciano Club and the IPD) in his attempt to reduce the support payments. She labels the journalist as “adulterous.”
* Prioritizing Other Children: Carranza questions diez’s priorities, suggesting he focuses on the children of a partner whose husband is in the Navy while neglecting his own son’s financial needs.
* Accusations Against the journalist’s Spouse: She directly addresses the journalist’s spouse,questioning how the relationship and potential gifts from Diez affect the child support situation and whether the spouse is aware of the situation.
* Ethical Concerns: Carranza questions the journalist’s professional ethics, asking if it’s appropriate to receive gifts from a footballer while reporting on his team.
Overall Tone:
The tone is highly accusatory and public. Carranza is using Instagram to air her grievances and publicly shame both diez and the journalist.She is framing the situation as a fight for her son’s rights.
