Renovation Cancellation Issues: Jyväskylä Coating Company Sale
Here’s a breakdown of the key facts from the provided text, focusing on the issues and concerns raised:
The Core Issue: Perhaps Illegal Cancellation Clause in Home Coating Agreement
Juhan’s Case: A man named Juhan signed an agreement with a coating company for home services. He discovered a concerning attachment to the agreement.
The Problematic Attachment: The attachment appears to waive the consumer’s right to cancel the agreement within a two-week period, which is standard practise when a salesperson visits a customer’s home.
Legal Opinion: Kristel Pynnönen, a lawyer with the Property Management Association, states that suggesting a waiver of the cancellation right by the seller is against the law. The consumer must request it themselves.
Company Response: The coating company hasn’t directly addressed whether thay violated the consumer Protection Act. They state they will review and improve the attachment’s content and provide further staff training to avoid future confusion.
secondary Issue: Lack of Required Pre-Notice for Alteration Work
Housing Company Act Requirement: Alteration work in housing companies requires a “pre-notice” approved by the housing association’s board.
Juhan’s Experience: juhan inquired about this pre-notice and discovered it hadn’t been filed.
* Importance of Pre-notice: The pre-notice is a security measure for housing companies to ensure alterations comply with building regulations and don’t negatively impact the property.
In essence,the article highlights potential deceptive practices by a coating company,involving both a questionable cancellation clause and a failure to follow proper procedures for alteration work in a housing company.