Reshetin-Peterson Comedy “Uz Visu Banka!” in Liepaja
“To the Whole Bank!”: A Latvian Play Explores Midlife Crisis and Desperate Measures
Table of Contents
Published October 27, 2025, 18:28:43
The Premise: A Dramatic Plea for a Loan
A new Latvian play, “To the Whole bank!” (originally titled “kredīts” by Jordi Galceran), centers around a man facing a midlife crisis and financial ruin. The narrative unfolds with a desperate act: a threat of infidelity directed at a bank director in a last-ditch attempt to secure a loan. The play’s opening depicts a man, denied a loan due to his age and lack of collateral, resorting to an extreme and shocking proposition – threatening to seduce the bank director and his wife.
A “Serious Comedy” with Depth
Director Intars Reshetin-Peterson describes the play as a “serious comedy,” aiming to explore weighty themes through humor. He emphasizes the play’s ability to entertain while concurrently provoking thought and raising questions. Reshetin-Peterson believes that delving beneath the surface of a story yields the greatest artistic satisfaction.
Starring Leading Latvian Actors
The production features Arti Robežnieks and Normunds Laizans, two prominent figures in Latvian theater. Reshetin-Peterson highlights the unique dynamic created by their return to the stage after years of experience, noting that their combined expertise enriches the collaborative process. He describes their involvement as both an “unprecedented experience” and a “creative challenge.”
Jordi Galceran and the Original Play
“To the Whole Bank!” is based on the play “Kredīts” by Spanish playwright Jordi Galceran. Galceran is known for his works that often explore complex moral dilemmas and societal issues through sharp dialog and dramatic situations. Further facts about Jordi Galceran and his other works can be found on his official website.
Themes of Ageism and Financial Desperation
The play tackles themes of ageism, financial insecurity, and the desperation that can arise when customary avenues for support are closed off. The protagonist’s age is explicitly cited as a reason for the loan denial, highlighting the challenges faced by older individuals seeking financial assistance. The narrative suggests a societal failure to provide adequate support systems for those in midlife who encounter unexpected setbacks.