Rubber conspirators – ¬ RADICALS analyze Piña, Claudio, TV stations and the crisis of de facto powers

In this installment of ¬ RADICALES, Alejandro Páez Varela, Álvaro Delgado, Héctor Alejandro Quintanar and Fabrizio Mejía Madrid analyzed the different fronts that the de facto powers have made to attack President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo. In this way, they revealed what is happening with Televisa and with TV Azteca, immersed in problems in the United States, as well as the other front in the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, the recent conflict between President Mexico with Claudio X . González, which defines another part of those de facto powers.

Mexico City, October 28 (However).— The Minister President Norma Piña Hernándezthe businessman and architect of the opposition bloc Claudio X. González Guajardo as well as the two leaders of the television stations, Ricardo Salinas Pliegofrom TV Azteca, a Emilio Azcarraga Jeanof Televisa, is an example of the crisis that the de facto powers are going through, they said Alejandro Páez Varela, Álvaro Delgado, Héctor Alejandro Quintanar and Fabrizio Mejía Madrid in ¬ RADICALES, program of the SinEmbargo Study B.

Who are the ones pressing the Court to overturn the Amendment? Those powers, like the Judiciary itself, which are going to lose privileges, are the Economic Power, is Claudio . “The media powers, within their huge crisis, Televisa and TV Azteca remain important media powers in Mexico because of what they radiate in other media, in the press, on the radio, on the television, the supranational powers. So, we are in defining days for one thing: is the old order really coming to an end.”

Delgado noted that the Judicial Branch of the Federation represents exactly that old order, one that is rooted in the face of a new democratic order that is trying to be born, “where in effect the three powers of the union, with their powers and their attributions, to carry out the same.”

And he elaborated: “Let’s see, there was a vote in Mexico on June 2, which gave representation to all political forces, which gave the victory for the Presidency of the Republic to Morena, to Claudia Sheinbaum, which gave representation to Morena in Congress, the Green Party, the PT, the PRI and the PAN. Those minorities are there or they are there according to popular will, and those minorities want to order so that the decision of a majority is annulled by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, how beautiful, those of the PRIAN used to give everything, which is “This is what’s playing right now.”

Héctor Alejandro Quintanar, for his part, questioned how these institutional powers, such as the Supreme Court, the judges, the magistrates, have shown themselves “as a barrier or a dam, instead of taking their legal responsibilities, their institutional responsibilities” and therefore themselves “behaved like true party lobbyists.”

“They are there to fulfill a legal function, a constitutional function, an institutional function, but with an alleged attitude of ‘there, we are beyond any partisan dispute’ and they make partisan decisions, this is all about ideological differences , not “It is a legal, judicial, constitutional question, it is one of ideological differences and the powers that are given cannot be up for debate,” Quintanar pointed out.

The academic Héctor Alejandro Quintanar claimed that there is a sector in Mexico loaded to the right, that does not know how to play with the rules of democracy and at the moment, he noted, a certain part of the Judiciary has “enough of room for movement to be putting stones in the shoe of Mexican democracy with these decisions.”

“The Supreme Court, which should be an institutional, formal power, acts as a vehicle for de facto power, namely these small pressure groups or this ideological cream that does not know how to play with the rules of democracy. So, unfortunately they act, not as a constitutional power, but as another political actor, who wants to put himself above the political rules, the legal rules and play with both and say ‘I have the law to oppose a political issue. ‘ , legally, already approved, was processed’, as it should have been processed through Congress, by a qualified majority achieved in the polls, therefore, we are in this space that can become a dead end .”, he said.

In this regard, the author Fabrizio Mejía Madrid noted that this use of law to solve political and ideological problems, internal and external, “that is, ideological, internal and geopolitical programs, it seems to me that, let’s say, the definition of “law, using the law as a weapon in war, where it’s about destroying the opponent, that you couldn’t defeat politically, then, the law is used to do that.”

“The crises of law that have occurred in Latin America, promoted by an internal sector of the countries linked to the geopolitical sectors of the United States, are what have led to the constitutional crisis in Brazil, in Ecuador, the accusations against Cristina (Fernández) in Argentina, Peru and we are currently witnessing what is happening in Colombia with (Gustavo) Petro and this attempt by the Supreme Court of Justice in Mexico to corner the President but also Congress for the reforms he is making,” he searched.

Mejía Madrid drew attention to how the State Department in the United States has been funding a program by the American Bar Association in Mexico since 2008 to obtain legal advice. “I wonder how the United States, with a completely different system to Mexico’s, a legal system, to Mexico’s, could provide training, but including six thousand students in the 32 states of the Republic, 935 teachers, in 237 schools of the law , That is, it is a program to co-opt lawyers for the benefit of the United States.”

“What we have at the moment, yes, it is effectively a legal war, where one party tries to use the law not only to de-harden the opponent, but also to try to destroy him, to disparage him, with all this discourse since. the inadmissibility of reviewing constitutional amendments becomes constitutional, which was already included in the Amparo Law, from there, says this opposition, including Claudio the dictatorship’, that is, they want to describe the change of regime from the media as establishing a new dictatorship,” he noted.

The journalist Alejandro Páez Varela explained in his speech that the United States exactly took advantage of the new adversarial criminal system to participate in Mexico. “Many countries have been involved in the new adversarial criminal system to provide advice at all levels, especially to ‘educate’ new judges, and to ‘educate’ lawyers, even public ministries, because that changes the background which was implemented with a constitutional amendment in 2014, from 2014 this system comes into force and has had, and the biggest sponsor in the world, the biggest sponsoring contributor is the United States, with that justification being their already entering Mexico “Several countries in the world, that is, have entered, at the same time, let’s not forget, they have been financing the law firms that already exist. “

For example, he remembered that Claudio X. González Guajardo has his strategic litigation firm which is basically responsible for confronting power structures. “Which one is it? Those who are not suitable for them, which is the law firm that the AIFA faced, they always try to paralyze López Obrador and all the works of López Obrador,” he said. “And obviously it is an arm of Mexicans Against Corruption and Right, which in turn worked directly with the media, that is, Mexicans Against Corruption was a kind of umbrella that was going to allow many media access content “for free, that’s the key word in Mexico and in many countries around the world.”

“Many of those investigations published in Reforma, in El Universal, in Proceso with Carmen Aristegui, in the mainstream press are marked with the right or the left, it doesn’t matter because Claudio’s associated media, which registered in their organization, guaranteed them free content,” he elaborated.

Páez Varela noted how Claudio X. González Guajardo even seized money that is usually distributed directly to the media. “Claudio X. González is sucking up resources for the US media and wasting them on what? Basically in wages and they distribute it among themselves. ” And he pointed out: “Not only from the media, but from foundations, it consumed those resources, it was a tremendous vacuum cleaner, and it ended in what? Like everything Claudio X touches, González overturned it and it went to the trash heap. “

Alejandro, Álvaro, Fabrizio and Héctor