Russia justifies its veto with 7 points against UK draft resolution on Sudan News
Russia recently vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution. This resolution called for an immediate stop to hostilities in Sudan. It also aimed to protect civilians amid ongoing conflict since April 2023.
The draft resolution was proposed by Britain and Sierra Leone. It gained support from 14 of the 15 council members. However, Russia’s representative, Dmitry Polyansky, opposed it, raising seven main points for the veto.
-
Ignoring the Sudanese Government: Polyansky argued that the resolution disregarded the Sudanese government’s authority. He stated that the Council should not interfere with negotiations between the conflicting parties and emphasized the government’s right to invite foreign assistance.
-
Intervention in Sudanese Affairs: He claimed the resolution could lead to foreign intervention. Polyansky warned that past attempts to impose decisions not supported by the Sudanese people contributed to the current crisis.
-
Real Purpose of the Resolution: Polyansky criticized the wording of the draft. He noted that previous calls to end sieges on towns like El Fasher were replaced. He expressed concern that the revised language could support ongoing violence.
-
Rejection of External Interference: Russia opposes using external mechanisms for accountability. Polyansky pointed out that international organizations, like the International Criminal Court, have not been effective in Sudan. He insisted that justice should be managed solely by the Sudanese government.
-
Deployment of International Forces: Polyansky stated that conditions were not suitable for deploying international forces. He highlighted the absence of a ceasefire agreement and a clear purpose for such forces in Sudan.
-
Humanitarian Situation: Polyansky disagreed with the characterization of the humanitarian situation in Sudan. He suggested the Sudanese government had valid reasons for controlling aid access, arguing that understanding the root causes of the crisis is essential.
- Double Standards: Polyansky concluded by pointing out perceived double standards in international responses. He noted different reactions to conflicts in Sudan and Gaza, criticizing countries for supporting one side while condemning another.
Polyansky called for an end to neo-colonial thinking and the chaos it brings. He urged respect for Sudan’s sovereignty and the importance of working with its government.