Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Russia-Ukraine War: Why “No Victory = Russia’s End” is a False Premise

Russia-Ukraine War: Why “No Victory = Russia’s End” is a False Premise

December 2, 2025 Ahmed Hassan - World News Editor World

“`html

Russian Analyst Argues ukraine war is Catastrophic ⁢for Russia’s ⁤Ethnonational Core

Table of Contents

  • Russian Analyst Argues ukraine war is Catastrophic ⁢for Russia’s ⁤Ethnonational Core
    • Shifting ​economic and⁤ Demographic Realities
    • The War as a Demographic and political ⁣Threat
    • Kremlin’s Historical Role as a Destructive‌ Force
    • Defeat as ⁣a Path to renewal

December⁢ 29, 2023

A Russian analyst, identified only⁢ as⁣ savvin, contends that the war in Ukraine is not serving Russia’s⁤ interests and is, in fact, detrimental to the preservation of its ethnonational identity.⁢ His analysis challenges prevailing Kremlin narratives and ⁢suggests that a⁣ Russian defeat in⁢ Ukraine could ultimately be beneficial for the‍ future of the Russian ⁢people.

Key Facts:

  • Claim: The war in Ukraine is a “catastrophe” for⁢ Russia’s ethnonational core.
  • Analyst: Savvin (full name and affiliation not specified‌ in the source).
  • Core Argument: A Russian defeat in Ukraine will not destroy Russia but may be necessary to remove a destructive regime.
  • Economic Shift: Russia’s reliance has shifted ​from grain exports to oil and gas.
  • Demographic Change: Ethnic ​Russians now⁢ comprise over 70% ‍of the population of the Russian Federation, up from 44% a ⁤century ago.

Shifting ​economic and⁤ Demographic Realities

Savvin points to significant changes in Russia’s economic ⁢and demographic landscape. He notes that russia is no longer reliant on grain exports, having transitioned to ⁣an economy focused on oil and gas – resources primarily sourced from within the Russian Federation, ⁢not Ukraine. ⁤ This contrasts with historical‌ dependencies. ‌Moreover, the proportion of ethnic​ Russians within the population of the​ russian Federation has increased substantially, rising to over 70% currently, ​compared to 44%⁣ a century ago. Statista provides data on​ Russia’s ethnic composition.

The War as a Demographic and political ⁣Threat

Despite these ⁤demographic ⁣shifts, Savvin argues the war‍ in​ Ukraine is actively undermining​ the “Russian ethnonational‍ core.” He cites mounting battlefield⁢ losses, a declining birthrate, and increased immigration‌ of individuals from culturally different backgrounds as contributing factors.He directly refutes the idea ⁢that Russia’s survival depends on defeating Ukraine, labeling such claims as “out ​of date ideological scheme[s]” and “openly absurd and thus deadly.”

Kremlin’s Historical Role as a Destructive‌ Force

Savvin is highly critical of the current Russian ‌regime, asserting‍ that those promoting the war are the same forces that have historically⁣ been “the most odious ⁣enemies of the Russian peoples.” He⁤ traces this antagonism back⁢ to 1917 and claims⁣ it continues to the present day. He accuses the Kremlin of using outdated ⁤thinking to justify what he describes‌ as a “bestial and⁢ insane war.”

Defeat as ⁣a Path to renewal

Contrary to conventional wisdom, Savvin believes a loss in ⁤Ukraine will not lead to Russia’s destruction. Instead, he⁣ posits⁤ that it could be the catalyst for removing the current regime, which he views as the greatest threat to‌ the‌ Russian people and⁣ the‍ key‌ to Russia’s future recovery. This perspective offers a⁣ stark contrast to the narratives promoted by the Kremlin regarding the necessity of achieving victory in‍ Ukraine.

– ahmedhassan

Savvin’s analysis is ⁣a significant departure from the dominant discourse​ within russia, where dissent is often suppressed. His argument that ​the war is demographically and culturally damaging to Russia is especially noteworthy. While the source doesn’t provide details about Savvin’s background or ⁢platform, the‌ content ‍suggests a critical perspective from ⁢within Russia itself.It’s crucial to note​ that this is a single analyst’s viewpoint,⁤ and its ⁣broader impact or depiction within russian society​ remains unclear. However, it highlights a potential undercurrent of opposition to the war based on concerns about Russia’s long-term national interests, rather than solely on geopolitical or ‍moral ​grounds.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Copyright Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service