Samaritans Branch Closures: UK & Ireland Plan
Samaritans Faces Volunteer Backlash Over Proposed Branch Closures and Remote Working
London, UK – The Samaritans, a renowned charity providing vital emotional support, is facing significant opposition from it’s dedicated volunteer base over proposed changes too its operational model. Plans to consolidate services into “larger brick branches” and explore remote volunteering have sparked fears of a loss of camaraderie, reduced accessibility, and a departure from the charity’s long-standing, successful approach.
The charity has outlined a vision for “smaller number of larger brick branches,” which translates to fewer, but larger, operational hubs with more volunteers on duty simultaneously. This move, according to the Samaritans, is intended to improve services and ensure buildings and shifts are “accessible to all,” with an expectation that increased flexibility will lead to a rise in volunteer numbers. the organisation insists it has no plans to reduce the overall level of service provided.
Though, these proposals have ignited concerns among many volunteers, some of whom have served for decades. A significant worry is the potential shift towards a “call center-style” model, which they fear will erode the “camaraderie” that defines the intimate atmosphere of smaller branches. Many volunteers,a demographic often over 50,are also apprehensive about the feasibility of travelling to consolidated branches located in larger towns and cities.
Further unease surrounds the prospect of remote volunteering, where individuals would handle calls from their homes, potentially connected to other volunteers via video link. Volunteers have expressed discomfort with the idea of dealing with distressing and sensitive calls in a domestic setting,questioning the suitability of such an arrangement.
“It does change the absolute basis of how we have worked and the understanding of our need to be in a safe place where we have support as callers,” stated one long-serving volunteer. “Would the ambulance service suddenly decide to have people take calls in their home?” they questioned,drawing a parallel to essential services.
The volunteer continued, “The current system has operated very successfully for 70 years. Now they’re thinking of dismantling it, and in a way that I think has upset a lot of volunteers. A lot of us are anxious and worried.” The sentiment is stark: “Almost every single volunteer that I have spoken to have said if they introduce call centres, we’re out. As well as helping others, people volunteer for their own mental health, to go to a safe space and meet like-minded people.”
The Samaritans argue that remote volunteering would open doors for individuals unable to travel to physical branches, particularly for challenging night shifts that are frequently enough challenging to staff.
The charity has committed to consulting volunteers on its plans before trustees make a final decision in September. Any confirmed changes are expected to be implemented gradually over several years. Volunteers are seeking greater transparency regarding the financial implications,specifically how much money is spent on maintaining branches and the projected savings from closing approximately half of them.Financial disclosures reveal the Samaritans’ 2023-24 annual accounts show a £7 million fund for fixed assets, including branches, alongside a property maintenance fund of £28,000 and a branch support fund of £287,000. The charity’s total charitable income for the period was £24.6 million. In its previous financial report, the Samaritans noted a decline in income for the third consecutive year, coupled with rising costs, which had necessitated the halting or postponement of projects due to funding constraints.
in a statement, Ms. Bentley, a representative for the Samaritans, emphasised the charity’s commitment to its life-saving mission. “samaritans provides a life-saving service, day and night, 365 days a year, but the changing needs of our callers and volunteers means thinking differently about the way our services need to work,” she stated.”We are engaging with our volunteers on proposed improvements that will mean we are able to answer more calls, have more volunteers on duty and be there for more people in their darkest moments. Over 200 branches, varying in size from 10 to 300 volunteers, is not sustainable and hinders us providing the best possible service to people who need us.”
