Sammy Obeid Censorship Claims: IMDA Responds
Okay, here’s a breakdown of the key information from the provided text, focusing on the timeline and the issues surrounding Dave Obeid’s cancelled stand-up shows in Singapore:
Timeline of Events:
July 8: Dave Obeid (or his team) inquired with IMDA (Infocomm Media Development Authority) about the submission process for performing.
July 9: IMDA provided details regarding the application process.
August 15: The application for the show was submitted through Obeid’s local agent.
August 19: IMDA rejected the application due to its lateness.
August 20: The agent appealed the rejection.
August 25: IMDA rejected the appeal.
August 27: Obeid posted on Instagram about the issues he was facing, alleging censorship.
August 31: IMDA spokesperson statement released. Obeid was scheduled to perform two shows at victoria Theatre (6pm & 8:30pm) - over 1,000 tickets sold.Key Issues & Points:
Lateness of Application: The primary reason given for the initial rejection was that the application was submitted late.
Script Submission: It’s unusual for stand-up comedy to require a full script. IMDA typically requests a synopsis and a video of a previous performance. Obeid submitted a 10-page script.
Alleged Censorship: Obeid claims his initial script was rejected as it contained references to Palestine and Israel, and instructions were given to remove these, and also portions relating to audience engagement.
Agent’s Account: Obeid’s local agent claims she repeatedly reminded him the application was late and that no script edits were needed. She hasn’t been able to contact him as his August 27th post.
IMDA’s Position: IMDA states the agent was unaware of Obeid’s claims.
Unclear Details: The identity of the local agent is not disclosed. The reason for Obeid submitting a script in the first place is also unclear.
In essence, the situation appears to be a combination of a late application, a misunderstanding about the requirements for stand-up comedy performances (script vs.synopsis/video),and Obeid’s claims of censorship,which IMDA doesn’t directly address in the provided text.