Seoul Mayoral Race: A Battle Over Housing Policies
- Seoul’s mayoral race is heating up, with candidates from the Democratic Party of Korea and the People Power Party clashing over housing policies.
- The debate over housing policies comes as Seoul faces ongoing pressure to address rising housing costs and limited availability.
- Jeon Hyun-hee has criticized Jeong Won-o’s pledges as “empty shells,” questioning the feasibility of his proposals.
Seoul’s mayoral race is heating up, with candidates from the Democratic Party of Korea and the People Power Party clashing over housing policies. The competition centers around differing approaches to address the city’s housing challenges, with candidates Jeong Won-o, Park Joo-min, and Jeon Hyun-hee outlining their plans.
The debate over housing policies comes as Seoul faces ongoing pressure to address rising housing costs and limited availability. Candidates are vying to present the most viable solutions, with scrutiny particularly focused on Jeong Won-o, considered the frontrunner and believed to have the backing of President Lee Jae-myung.
Policy Clashes and Scrutiny
Jeon Hyun-hee has criticized Jeong Won-o’s pledges as “empty shells,” questioning the feasibility of his proposals. Park Joo-min has also pressed Jeong on the effectiveness of his policies, specifically regarding funding plans. This scrutiny reflects the high stakes of the election and the importance of presenting concrete and well-funded solutions to Seoul’s housing issues.

Both Park and Jeon emphasized their vetting as “vetted candidates” during a recent debate on MBC’s “100-Minute Debate.” Park stated, “If vetting fails during the primary, the result is defeat in the general election. We need more thorough vetting and more rigorous debate.” Jeon added, “I am the candidate whom the Yoon Suk-yeol administration investigated thoroughly but found not a speck of dust on. You have to be clean to win. An uncertain candidate won’t do.” These remarks highlight the candidates’ attempts to differentiate themselves by emphasizing their integrity and transparency, particularly in light of recent allegations against Jeong.
Differing Views on Public Transit
The candidates also addressed President Lee Jae-myung’s proposal to restrict free subway rides for senior citizens during rush hours, with all three expressing agreement with the intent behind the proposal. However, they differed on the method of implementation. Park suggested exploring ways to increase public transit use while reducing congestion, potentially through temporary fare reductions or flexible commute hours. Jeon proposed issuing separate transit cards for elderly commuters who work during rush hours, allowing them to continue using the existing free transit system.
These differing approaches underscore the complexities of balancing the needs of various demographics while addressing broader issues such as congestion and energy crises.
Focus on Housing Supply
Park Soo-min, a primary candidate for the People Power Party (PPP), has identified jobs and housing as the most pressing issues facing Seoul. He pledged to work with the President, Prime Minister, and Deputy Prime Minister for Economic Affairs to address these concerns. He specifically stated his opposition to a potential hike in the real estate holding tax, which has been discussed as part of a July tax reform package.
Park believes that securing a stable housing supply will have positive ripple effects on other areas, such as childbirth, childcare, and education. “When jobs and the housing ladder are stable, people can get married, have children, and build their lives,” he stated. “But how many people are fully prepared from the start? People are not marrying or having children because their jobs and housing are insecure.”
Park Soo-min aims to supply 60,000–70,000 homes annually if elected, demonstrating a commitment to increasing housing availability in the city.
Alignment with Presidential Administration
Throughout the debates, candidates have emphasized their alignment with President Lee Jae-myung, recognizing the importance of collaboration between the city and the central government. This alignment is seen as crucial for securing funding and support for key policy initiatives.
The Democratic candidates, including Jeong Won-o, have sought to demonstrate their commitment to the President’s agenda while also presenting their own unique visions for Seoul’s future. This balancing act reflects the complex political dynamics at play in the mayoral race.
The clash over housing policies and the emphasis on alignment with the presidential administration highlight the key issues shaping the Seoul mayoral election. As the election approaches, voters will be closely watching the candidates’ proposals and evaluating their ability to deliver on their promises.
