Šķēles ģimenes kompānija par 75 miljoniem audzē pamatkapitālu
Latvian Prime Minister’s Family Business sees Major capital Boost
Table of Contents
Riga, Latvia - The holding company owned by Latvian Prime Minister Andris Šķēles’ family, SIA “sabiedrība privātajiem ieguldījumiem,” has experienced a meaningful increase in its registered capital. The company’s capital has surged by €75,239,060, bringing the total to €79,166,200, according to publicly available data from “Firmas.lv.”
This substantial capital injection comes in the form of a “mantisko ieguldījumu,” or non-monetary contribution, from the company’s existing shareholders.
“The company’s capital has been increased by contributions from the company’s shareholders,” reads a statement outlining the capital increase.
the ownership structure of the company remains unchanged. Kristiāna Lībane-Šķēle retains a 30% stake, while Aneta Šķēle-Pētersone and Madara Šķēle-Dupate each hold 25%. Iveta Smilga-Krongorne and Edgars Šķenders each own 10% of the company.
The non-monetary contributions are valued at €22,571,718 for Lībane-Šķēle, €18,809,765 for Šķēle-Pētersone, €18,809,765 for Šķēle-Dupate, €7,523,906 for Smilga-Krongorne, and €7,523,906 for Šķenders. These valuations were determined by ”Biznesa konsultantu grupa,” a Latvian business consulting firm.
The changes to the company’s capital were officially registered with the Latvian Enterprise Register on December 20th.
SIA “Sabiedrība privātajiem ieguldījumiem” is a significant player in the Latvian economy. The company’s holding structure encompasses various businesses, and its 2023 financial performance reflects this diverse portfolio.Despite a 12.9% decrease in turnover compared to 2022, the company’s profit increased by an impressive 43.3%, reaching €3,989 million.
Latvian Oligarch’s Business Empire Spans Industries From Ports to Dairy
Riga, Latvia – A Latvian oligarch’s sprawling business empire, managed through a complex web of subsidiaries, has come under scrutiny for its vast holdings across diverse sectors.”Privāto aktīvu pārvalde” (private Asset Management), a company controlled by a prominent Latvian businessman, has established numerous subsidiaries under the “Inpo” brand. These subsidiaries own stakes in a wide range of companies, including port operators, dairy producers, and even a bus company.
One notable holding is a 65.25% stake in “Rīgas jahtu centrs “Andrejosta””, a yacht center in Riga. ”Inpo” subsidiaries also hold significant shares in “Jahtu serviss “Andrejosta””, a yacht service provider, and ”Ogres piens”, a dairy company.
the empire extends to the transportation sector, with “inpo” owning a 67% stake in “LAP1R”, which in turn controls 60.12% of “Liepājas autobusu parks”, a bus company in Liepāja.
“Privāto aktīvu pārvalde” also has a presence in real estate through “Centrus Real Land” and port management through “Port Management”.
The sheer breadth of the oligarch’s holdings has raised questions about market concentration and potential conflicts of interest. Critics argue that such extensive control over key industries could stifle competition and limit consumer choice.
While the exact financial details of the empire remain largely opaque, the sheer number and diversity of its holdings paint a picture of significant economic influence.
Tiny Home, Big dreams: Couple Trades City Life for Sustainable Living
A growing number of Americans are ditching customary homes for a simpler, more sustainable lifestyle in tiny houses.
For Sarah and Mark Thompson, the decision to downsize was a leap of faith. After years of living in a cramped city apartment,they yearned for more space,fresh air,and a connection to nature. Their solution? A 300-square-foot tiny home nestled on a plot of land in rural Vermont.
“We were tired of the hustle and bustle,” Sarah explained. “We wanted a life that was more intentional,more sustainable. Tiny living felt like the perfect fit.”
The Thompsons’ journey is not unique. Across the country, a movement towards minimalist living is gaining momentum. Driven by factors like rising housing costs, environmental concerns, and a desire for greater freedom, more and more people are embracing the tiny house lifestyle.
[Image: Sarah and Mark Thompson standing proudly in front of their tiny home, surrounded by lush greenery.]
Building their own tiny home was a labor of love. They spent months researching designs, sourcing materials, and learning new skills. The process wasn’t always easy, but the Thompsons say the challenges were outweighed by the rewards.
“It was incredibly empowering to build our own home,” Mark saeid. “We learned so much about ourselves and each other along the way.”
Their tiny home is a testament to their commitment to sustainability.It features solar panels, a composting toilet, and rainwater harvesting system. Every inch of space is carefully designed for functionality and efficiency.
“We’ve learned to live with less, and we’ve realized that we don’t need a lot of stuff to be happy,” Sarah said.
The Thompsons’ story is a reminder that happiness doesn’t always come in a big package. Sometiems, the smallest spaces can hold the biggest dreams.
Latvian PMS Family Business Sees major Capital Boost: Is There more to the Story?
riga,Latvia – The holding company owned by Latvian Prime Minister Andris Šķēles’ family,SIA “Sabiedrība privātajiemieguldījumiem,” recently received a significant boost to its registered capital. The increase, amounting to €75,239,060, brings the company’s total capital to €79,166,200, according to data from “Firmas.lv.”
While the company claims this substantial injection came in the form of “non-monetary contributions” from existing shareholders, this unusual move has raised eyebrows. What exactly constitutes these contributions, adn what is their true value?
A Closer Look at the Figures
The company’s statement simply lists the valuation figures for each shareholder’s contribution. Kristiāna Lībane-Šķēle, with a 30% stake, contributed €22,571,718 worth of assets. Aneta Šķēle-Pētersone and Madara Šķēle-Dupate, each holding 25%, contributed €18,809,765 each. Iveta Smilga-Krongorne and Edgars Šķenders, each owning 10%, contributed €7,523,906. These valuations were determined by Latvian business consulting firm “Biznesa konsultantu grupa.”
These figures raise several questions: What assets were contributed? Were these assets independently valued? How were the valuations determined by “Biznesa konsultantu grupa?” The lack of transparency surrounding these details fuels speculation and demands further scrutiny.
Opacity Fuels Concerns
This situation highlights a wider concern about transparency and potential conflicts of interest when it comes to the Prime Minister’s family businesses. The public deserves to know more about the nature of these contributions and the potential implications for the Prime Minister’s role. This lack of clarity undermines public trust and raises questions about the potential for undue influence.
NewDirectory3.com will continue to investigate this story and push for greater transparency from SIA “Sabiedrība privātajiem ieguldījumiem” and the Latvian government.