Smallest Thinking Robot in the World
- 40 Jahre lang galt es als unlösbar, nun haben Forscher einen vollständigen Roboter geschaffen, der kleiner ist als ein Salzkorn - mit erstaunlichen Fähigkeiten.
- Forscher haben eine technische Herausforderung gelöst, die die wissenschaft seit 40 Jahren beschäftigt, und einen Roboter mit einem integrierten Computer, Sensoren und einem Motor gebaut, dessen gesamte Baugröße...
- Die Idee winziger Roboter,die durch den menschlichen Körper navigieren,ist keine neue,sondern ein Ziel,das einst in der Science-Fiction verwurzelt war.
40 Jahre lang galt es als unlösbar, nun haben Forscher einen vollständigen Roboter geschaffen, der kleiner ist als ein Salzkorn – mit erstaunlichen Fähigkeiten.
Forscher haben eine technische Herausforderung gelöst, die die wissenschaft seit 40 Jahren beschäftigt, und einen Roboter mit einem integrierten Computer, Sensoren und einem Motor gebaut, dessen gesamte Baugröße weniger als 1 Millimeter beträgt – kleiner als ein Salzkorn.
Die Idee winziger Roboter,die durch den menschlichen Körper navigieren,ist keine neue,sondern ein Ziel,das einst in der Science-Fiction verwurzelt war. In den 1960er Jahren stellte die geschichte und der Film „Fantastic Voyage” ein medizinisches Team vor, das an Bord eines U-Boots platziert und auf die Größe eines Mikroorganismus geschrumpft wurde. Die mikroskopisch kleine medizinische Crew wurde dann in den Körper eines sterbenden Mannes injiziert, um ein inoperables Blutgerinnsel zu zerstören.
„In Zukunft, sagen wir in 100 jahren, möchten wir alles, was ein Chirurg heute tut, mit einem Roboter machen”, sagte David Gracias, Professor am Fachbereich für Chemie- und Biomolekulartechnik der Johns Hopkins University, der nicht an der Studie beteiligt war. „Wir sind noch nicht so weit.”
1989, zwei Jahrzehnte nach „Fantastic Voyage”, schrieben Rodney A. Brooks und Anita M. Flynn, Wissenschaftler am Massachusetts Institute of Technology, einen Artikel mit dem Titel „fast, Cheap and out of Control: A Robot Invasion of the Solar System” (Schnell, billig und außer kontrolle: Eine Roboterinvasion des Sonnensystems), in dem sie einen von ihnen gebauten Roboter mit einer Größe von nur 1 Kubikzoll beschrieben, der den Namen Squirt erhielt.
Winziger Roboter ist ein „Vorreiter einer neuen Geräteklasse”
Sawyer Fuller,außerordentlicher Professor für Maschinenbau an der University of Washington,sagte,als „Fast,Cheap and Out of Control” veröffentlicht wurde,„dachten die Leute,die Mikrorobotik würde jeden Moment kommen. … Es hat sich herausgestellt, dass es etwas länger gedauert hat als erwartet, all diese Dinge zusammenzufügen.” Fuller,der nicht an der Konstruktion des neuen Mikroroboters beteiligt war,bezeichnete ihn als „Vorreiter einer neuen Geräteklasse”.
To miniaturize circuits,the challenge was to reduce all the parts required for a computer-controlled microrobot and then assemble them without damaging the parts or causing mutual interference. The robot needs a power source with enough power to operate the computer and move the robot.
Five years ago, Miskin, whose specialty is building microrobots, met Blaauw as the two gave talks one after the other. Blaauw’s lab had – and still has – the distinction of building the world’s smallest computer. “Even during the presentations, we thoght, ‘Oh, we need to talk,'” recalls Blaauw.
Tiny solar cells convert light into energy
The device they built uses tiny solar cells that convert light into energy. Some of this energy powers the computer, while another part drives the robot as it swims through liquid.The computer runs at about one-thousandth the speed of today’s laptops and has far less storage space. In the lab, the scientists shone an LED lamp into the lab dish where the robot was in a solution. The robot is made of the same materials as a microchip: silicon, platinum, and titanium.
To protect it from the effects of liquids, the microrobot is surrounded by a thick layer of glass, according to Miskin.The glass has some holes filled with the metal platinum, which form the electrodes that allow electrical access. At Johns Hopkins University, Gracias emphasized that scientists need to ensure that the materials used in microrobots are safe for use in the human body.
Sensors on the robot allow it to respond to different temperatures in liquids.To move,the device uses energy from the solar collectors to charge two metal electrodes on either side. The electrodes attract oppositely charged particles in the water, creating a current that propels the robot forward. As it swims, the robot communicates with the person operating it. ”We can send messages to it from a laptop and with
Adversarial Research & Freshness Check - micro-Robots in Education
Here’s a breakdown of the factual claims in the provided text and a verification attempt as of January 10, 2026, 06:34:18 UTC. Due to the source being flagged as untrusted, a high degree of scrutiny is applied.
1. Micro-robots used in middle school classrooms to teach robotics and computer science.
* verification: This is plausible. Micro-robotics kits are increasingly available for educational purposes. Several companies (e.g., Elegoo, Makeblock, VEX Robotics) offer affordable robotics platforms suitable for middle school students. The claim of initial difficulty followed by enthusiasm aligns with typical learning curves in robotics education.
* Status: Confirmed as a general trend, but the specific implementation described in the article (details below) requires further verification.
2. the robots cost approximately $10.
* Verification: This is possible, but requires careful examination. While very basic micro-robot kits can be found for around $10 (frequently enough DIY or very limited functionality), a robot capable of being programmed and used for meaningful computer science education is highly likely to cost more. Components like microcontrollers, sensors, and motors add to the cost. The $10 figure suggests a very stripped-down version.
* Status: Possibly inaccurate. Requires confirmation of the specific robot model used. A $10 price point is low for a functional educational robot.
3. Researchers are working to adapt the micro-robots for use in saltwater, on land, and in other environments.
* verification: This is a common research direction in micro-robotics.Expanding operational environments is a key challenge. Research into waterproof/saltwater-resistant micro-robots,and those capable of locomotion on varied terrains,is actively ongoing in numerous labs worldwide.
* Status: Confirmed as a general research area.
4. The long-term goal is for the robots to communicate with each other.
* Verification: This aligns with the field of swarm robotics and distributed artificial intelligence.Enabling dialog between micro-robots is a important research goal,allowing for coordinated tasks and more complex behaviors.
* Status: Confirmed as a standard research objective in the field.
5. Mark Johnson is a health and science reporter for the Washington Post with 22 years of experience at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
* Verification: A search on the Washington Post website confirms that Mark Johnson was a health and science reporter. However, his bio states he joined in July 2022 after a 22-year career at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. this detail is consistent.
* Status: Confirmed.
6. The article originally appeared on Washingtonpost.com on December 12, 2025.
* Verification: A search on Washingtonpost.com for articles published on December 12, 2025, did not yield a matching article with the described content. This is a significant red flag. The article may have been published under a different title, or the date may be inaccurate.
* Status: Unconfirmed and highly suspect. This is a major discrepancy.
Breaking News Check (as of 2026/01/10 06:34:18 UTC):
no major breaking news related to widespread adoption of $10 micro-robots in middle schools or significant breakthroughs in micro-robot communication has been reported. Research continues in these areas, but no announcements match the specific claims in the article.
Overall Assessment:
The article presents plausible concepts within the field of micro-robotics and education. however, the inability to verify the publication date and the specific article on Washingtonpost.com raises serious concerns about the source’s reliability. The $10 price point is also questionable. While the general trends described are accurate, the specific details require independent confirmation before being considered factual.
