Home » News » Social Cohesion Project Cuts: De Smedt & Hamou Blame Gatz

Social Cohesion Project Cuts: De Smedt & Hamou Blame Gatz

Source: This text is based ⁤on a social media post (X, formerly Twitter) ‌and requires independent verification due to the source’s untrusted nature.

Date of Original Text: ​ 2026-01-26 18:42:00

Criticism of Reduced Buurtwerking (Local policing) in the netherlands

A critic, identified only through ‌the provided text as posting on X, argues that a‌ reduction in *buurtwerking* (local policing) in the Netherlands will lead to negative consequences, including a 40% ‌decrease in​ neighborhood-level policing efforts, increased costs‌ for police, the justice system, and victims of crime, and ‍constitutes ⁣poor budgetary policy.

As of January 26, 2026, ⁣no ‌independent, authoritative ​sources have⁢ confirmed these specific claims. A search for related news articles and official statements regarding‍ changes to ⁣*buurtwerking* funding and implementation is ongoing.

What is ‍*Buurtwerking*?

*Buurtwerking* refers to a community-based policing approach in the Netherlands, ⁣where police officers are actively‍ engaged in‌ local neighborhoods to build relationships, prevent crime, and address community concerns. Dutch National Police -⁢ Community Policing defines​ it ⁣as a proactive ‍approach focused on collaboration ⁤wiht residents and local ⁣organizations.

Detail: This approach emphasizes visibility, accessibility, and problem-solving⁣ in⁤ partnership with the community. It differs from customary reactive policing by prioritizing prevention and addressing the ‌root causes of crime.

Example: A typical⁤ *buurtwerking*‍ activity might involve officers regularly patrolling neighborhoods on foot or ⁢bicycle, attending local meetings, and working with⁢ schools and community groups to address issues like vandalism or petty theft.

Potential Consequences of Reduction in *Buurtwerking*

The critic ‍claims⁣ a 40% reduction‍ in *buurtwerking* will result⁤ in increased costs ⁣for the police, justice system, ⁤and victims. This assertion suggests ‌a belief ‌that preventative policing is more cost-effective ⁤than dealing with the consequences of crime after it occurs.

Detail: Reduced *buurtwerking* could ‌lead⁤ to⁤ a decline in information gathering, slower response times to‍ local issues, and a weakening of trust between ⁢the police and the community. This, in⁤ turn, could contribute to an ⁢increase in crime rates and a⁣ greater burden on the‌ criminal justice system.

Example:‍ If *buurtwerking* officers⁣ are ‍reduced, fewer eyes and ears will be available to identify and‍ address potential problems before they escalate. This could lead to an increase in reported incidents requiring intervention from more expensive specialized units.

Dutch Policing and‍ Budgetary Concerns

The Netherlands has faced ongoing discussions regarding police funding and resource allocation. Rijksoverheid – Police (Dutch Government Portal) provides information on national policing policies and budgets.

Detail: Budgetary constraints frequently enough necessitate difficult choices regarding ‍the allocation of resources ‌within the ⁣police force. ⁢These choices⁣ can impact​ the level of investment in community-based‍ policing initiatives like *buurtwerking*.

Example: ‌In 2023, the Dutch government allocated approximately ‌€9.5 billion to policing,according to Statistics Netherlands (CBS). Changes to this budget can ⁤directly affect the scope and effectiveness of *buurtwerking* programs.

Disclaimer: ⁣ This information is based on a single, untrusted source and requires further verification. The claims made have not⁢ been independently confirmed⁢ as of January 26, 2026.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.