Stefon Diggs’ Assault Accuser Speaks Out After He is Found Not Guilty

A Massachusetts jury acquitted NFL wide receiver Stefon Diggs of assault and strangulation charges in early May 2026. The verdict followed a brief trial in which jurors deliberated for less than two hours before returning not guilty findings on all counts.

Following the acquittal, the woman who brought the allegations, identified as Diggs’ former personal chef, spoke publicly to address the outcome and the nature of the proceedings. She stated that the legal result does not alter her recollection of the events and maintained that her testimony was truthful.

The accuser specifically addressed the scrutiny she faced during the trial, including questions regarding her employment and her personal relationship with Diggs. She pushed back against assertions that her claims were driven by financial gain, stating that public narratives regarding her intentions have been inaccurate.

I refused to be silenced.Statement from the accuser

The woman further alleged that false information had been spread about her throughout the legal process. She emphasized that she did not seek publicity or attention by coming forward, but rather hoped that speaking out would clarify her position.

Trial Evidence and Conflicting Accounts

The case centered on a dispute that prosecutors said occurred in December 2025 inside the home of Stefon Diggs. The accuser alleged that Diggs assaulted and choked her during an argument that had broken out over her pay.

Diggs denied the allegations from the onset of the investigation. His legal team argued throughout the trial that the accuser’s claims were inconsistent and lacked the credible evidence necessary for a conviction.

A central theme of the defense’s strategy was the suggestion that the accusations were financially motivated. This argument was heavily emphasized during the cross-examination of the accuser, as the defense sought to establish a motive for fabrication.

Legal analysts noted that the trial relied heavily on conflicting personal accounts between the two parties. Because there was limited physical evidence presented to the jury, the outcome hinged on which version of events the jurors found more believable.

The speed of the verdict, with jurors reaching a decision in under two hours, indicated significant doubts regarding the strength of the prosecution’s case.

Professional Impact and Career Context

The legal proceedings drew significant public attention due to the high profile of Stefon Diggs. As a veteran NFL receiver who has played for multiple teams over a long career, Diggs’ presence in the league makes his legal standing a matter of professional interest.

Prior to the acquittal, the pending charges of strangulation and assault had raised questions about Diggs’ future within the NFL and how the league might respond to the allegations. With the jury’s not guilty verdict, those professional uncertainties are expected to ease.

Despite the legal resolution, the accuser maintained her stance on the events of December 2025. She stated, I know what happened, asserting that the jury’s decision does not change her experience.