Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World

Stop Doing That: A Guide to Breaking Bad Habits

October 7, 2025 Jennifer Chen Health
News Context
At a glance
  • A major⁢ clinical ⁢trial, the SELECT trial,⁤ has revealed a potential increased risk of⁣ cardiovascular events - ⁤including heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death - in individuals with...
  • The SELECT trial followed participants for⁢ an average of 3.4 years.
  • The SELECT trial focused on adults with obesity⁢ (BMI of 30 or ⁣higher)‍ *and* pre-existing cardiovascular disease, such as a history of heart attack, stroke, or peripheral artery...
Original source: nejm.org

Ozempic⁢ and Cardiovascular⁣ Risk: New Findings Demand Closer Scrutiny

Table of Contents

  • Ozempic⁢ and Cardiovascular⁣ Risk: New Findings Demand Closer Scrutiny
    • What happened?⁣ A Closer Look⁣ at teh SELECT Trial
    • Key⁢ Findings and Data ⁤Breakdown
    • Who is Affected?⁣ Understanding the Patient Population
    • What Dose This ⁣Meen? Implications⁣ for Patients and Physicians
    • Timeline of⁢ events

What happened?⁣ A Closer Look⁣ at teh SELECT Trial

A major⁢ clinical ⁢trial, the SELECT trial,⁤ has revealed a potential increased risk of⁣ cardiovascular events – ⁤including heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death – in individuals with obesity and established cardiovascular disease who‍ were treated with semaglutide (Ozempic). The study, involving over 17,600⁢ participants, showed a ⁢statistically meaningful, though⁢ relatively⁢ small, increase ⁤in ‍these events compared ⁣to a placebo group. This ⁢finding challenges‍ previous assumptions about the cardiovascular safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide.

Data Visualization Placeholder ⁤- Cardiovascular Event Rates
Projected cardiovascular event rates in the SELECT trial, comparing⁣ semaglutide and placebo groups. ⁢(Data ‍visualization placeholder)

Key⁢ Findings and Data ⁤Breakdown

The SELECT trial followed participants for⁢ an average of 3.4 years. the⁤ primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial⁣ infarction, or nonfatal stroke occurred in 6.5% of those receiving semaglutide versus 5.8% in the placebo group – a ⁤hazard ratio of 1.13.While ‍this difference is statistically significant, it’s crucial to understand the absolute risk increase. Specifically, this translates to approximately 1.1 additional cardiovascular events per 100 person-years of treatment.

Outcome Semaglutide⁢ Group (%) Placebo Group (%) Hazard Ratio
Cardiovascular Death 1.5 1.2 1.26
Nonfatal Myocardial ⁣Infarction 3.7 3.3 1.12
Nonfatal Stroke 1.9 1.3 1.47
Composite⁢ Outcome (CV Death, MI, Stroke) 6.5 5.8 1.13

Who is Affected?⁣ Understanding the Patient Population

The SELECT trial focused on adults with obesity⁢ (BMI of 30 or ⁣higher)‍ *and* pre-existing cardiovascular disease, such as a history of heart attack, stroke, or peripheral artery disease. This is a critical distinction. The findings do *not* necessarily apply⁢ to individuals with obesity who do⁤ not have established cardiovascular issues, or to those using⁣ semaglutide for type 2 diabetes. The average age of⁢ participants was 61, and approximately ⁣40% were women.

What Dose This ⁣Meen? Implications⁣ for Patients and Physicians

These results necessitate⁢ a more cautious approach to prescribing semaglutide, and similar GLP-1 receptor agonists, for patients ⁤with pre-existing cardiovascular disease.Doctors should carefully weigh the potential benefits of weight loss⁤ against the newly identified cardiovascular risks. A thorough discussion with patients about ⁤these risks is paramount, ensuring informed consent and⁤ shared decision-making.Further research is needed to‍ determine if these findings extend to other GLP-1 receptor agonists and‍ to‍ different patient populations.

‍ – drjenniferchen
⁤ ⁤

The SELECT ⁤trial is a stark reminder that even medications initially⁣ considered⁢ cardiovascularly neutral can reveal unforeseen risks with longer-term and more focused study. The relatively small absolute ⁣risk increase shouldn’t be dismissed, especially in ⁢a vulnerable population.This highlights the importance of ongoing post-market surveillance and rigorous⁣ clinical trials, even after a drug‍ has been widely adopted.

Timeline of⁢ events

  • November 2

    Share this:

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

    Related reading

    • Ozempic and the Brain: Weight Loss Effects and Unknowns
    • Processed Foods and Sedentary Lifestyles Fuel India Metabolic Crisis

    Related

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com