Home » Tech » Superkilonova: Double Cosmic Explosion Reveals New Physics

Superkilonova: Double Cosmic Explosion Reveals New Physics

by Lisa Park - Tech Editor

Okay, here’s a​ breakdown of the key ​facts from the provided text, formatted for clarity:

Headline: A Possible “Super-Kilonova” – A Unique Stellar Explosion

What Happened?

* Astronomers have detected a stellar explosion, dubbed AT2025ulz,​ that⁢ appears to be both a ⁣supernova and a kilonova.
* ​ The leading theory is‍ that a supernova created two ‍neutron stars,‌ which then merged to form a kilonova.
* ⁣ ⁤ This would be ​the second kilonova ‍ever detected and the first to occur in this complex, two-stage manner.

Key Concepts Explained:

* Supernova: A powerful and luminous explosion of a star at the end​ of‍ its life, scattering elements like‌ carbon and iron into the universe.
* ⁣ ⁤ Kilonova: ‍ A much rarer and more energetic explosion resulting from ⁤the merger of two ‌neutron stars. Kilonovas create heavier ⁤elements like gold and⁤ uranium.
* Neutron Stars: Extremely‌ dense remnants‍ of massive stars after they ⁤explode as supernovae.
* Gravitational Waves: Ripples in spacetime caused by cataclysmic events like the merging of neutron stars. These are detected by facilities like LIGO.

How it was​ Detected:

* LIGO (a​ gravitational wave detector) initially detected a signal resembling the 2017 kilonova event.
* A survey⁤ camera‍ then confirmed rapidly ⁢fading red light ‌ from the same location – a characteristic of kilonovae.
* Surprisingly,the source then flared again in blue light,more typical of a supernova.

Why it’s⁣ Significant:

* ⁣ Unique Event: The ⁣dual nature of the explosion (supernova followed‌ by kilonova) is unprecedented.
* Element Creation: Kilonovas are crucial for creating ⁢heavy elements essential for forming stars and planets.
* Low-Mass Neutron Star: The gravitational wave ⁣data suggests the merger involved a neutron star ⁤with ⁤a mass lower ​ than the Sun, which was previously thought ‌to be theoretically impossible.

Quote from ​Lead ‌Researcher:

* Mansi Kasliwal (Caltech): “at first, for about three days, the ⁢eruption looked just like the first‌ kilonova in ⁣2017… ⁤then it ‍started ⁣to look more like a supernova… but ⁤there were too many unanswered questions to‌ conclude it was a supernova.”

Source:

* The research is published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters (https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ae2000).

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.