Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World

Supreme Court Rejects Plea on ‘VIP Dharshan’ at Mahakaleshwar Temple

January 27, 2026 Robert Mitchell News
News Context
At a glance
  • The Supreme ⁢Court of India on Tuesday‍ dismissed a petition challenging the "VIP darshan" practise at the Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, stating the matter is...
  • The petition, filed by Darpan Awasthi, contested a previous ruling ⁤by the Madhya Pradesh high Court‍ that upheld the⁢ preferential treatment‍ given to VIPs allowing them access to...
  • Advocate Vishnu Shankar ⁣Jain,‍ representing the petitioner, argued that the VIP ‍access violated Article 14 ⁤of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law.
Original source: livelaw.in

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge‍ to VIP Access at Mahakaleshwar Temple

Table of Contents

  • Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge‍ to VIP Access at Mahakaleshwar Temple
  • Petition Details and Court Response
  • Article 14 and Equal Treatment
  • outcome⁢ of the Case

The Supreme ⁢Court of India on Tuesday‍ dismissed a petition challenging the “VIP darshan” practise at the Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, stating the matter is not within the‍ courtS purview.

Petition Details and Court Response

The petition, filed by Darpan Awasthi, contested a previous ruling ⁤by the Madhya Pradesh high Court‍ that upheld the⁢ preferential treatment‍ given to VIPs allowing them access to the ⁣ garbhagriha (innermost sanctum) to offer prayers, while restricting access for the general public. A bench consisting of Chief Justice of India Surya ⁤Kant,⁣ Justice R Mahadevan, and Justice Joymalya⁣ Bagchi heard the case.

Article 14 and Equal Treatment

Advocate Vishnu Shankar ⁣Jain,‍ representing the petitioner, argued that the VIP ‍access violated Article 14 ⁤of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law. ⁢He⁢ asserted⁣ the need for a uniform policy⁢ regarding access to the garbhagriha, stating that‍ citizens should not be discriminated against based on their VIP status. “Whether a person who should be allowed inside the garbhgriha, there should be a uniform policy of equal treatment,” ⁢Jain⁤ submitted.

outcome⁢ of the Case

Following the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear ⁤the petition, the petitioner withdrew⁤ the case with the option to submit ‍a ‍representation to the relevant authorities. The Madhya Pradesh High Court had ⁣previously dismissed Awasthi’s petition on November 28, 2023, as‍ reported by⁢ LiveLaw (https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court-pil-vip-mahakaleshwar-temple-302633).

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Supreme Court, ujjain mahakal temple, VIP Darshan

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com