Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World

Supreme Court Rejects Plea on ‘VIP Dharshan’ at Mahakaleshwar Temple

January 27, 2026 Robert Mitchell News
News Context
At a glance
  • The Supreme ⁢Court‌ of India on Tuesday‍ dismissed a‌ petition challenging the "VIP darshan" practise at the Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, stating the matter is...
  • The ​petition, filed​ by Darpan Awasthi, contested a previous ruling ⁤by the Madhya Pradesh high Court‍ that ‌upheld the⁢ preferential​ treatment‍ given to VIPs allowing​ them access ​to...
  • Advocate Vishnu Shankar ⁣Jain,‍ representing the petitioner, argued that the VIP ‍access violated Article 14 ⁤of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality​ before the law.
Original source: livelaw.in

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge‍ to VIP Access at Mahakaleshwar Temple

Table of Contents

  • Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge‍ to VIP Access at Mahakaleshwar Temple
  • Petition Details and Court Response
  • Article ​14 and ​Equal Treatment
  • outcome⁢ of the Case

The Supreme ⁢Court‌ of India on Tuesday‍ dismissed a‌ petition challenging the “VIP darshan” practise at the Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, stating the matter is not within the‍ courtS purview.

Petition Details and Court Response

The ​petition, filed​ by Darpan Awasthi, contested a previous ruling ⁤by the Madhya Pradesh high Court‍ that ‌upheld the⁢ preferential​ treatment‍ given to VIPs allowing​ them access ​to the ⁣ garbhagriha (innermost ​sanctum) to offer​ prayers, while restricting access for the general public. A bench consisting of Chief Justice of India Surya ⁤Kant,⁣ Justice R Mahadevan, and Justice Joymalya⁣ Bagchi heard ​the‌ case.

Article ​14 and ​Equal Treatment

Advocate Vishnu Shankar ⁣Jain,‍ representing the petitioner, argued that the VIP ‍access violated Article 14 ⁤of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality​ before the law. ⁢He⁢ asserted⁣ the need for a​ uniform​ policy⁢ regarding access to the‌ garbhagriha, stating that‍ citizens should not be discriminated against based on their VIP status. “Whether a person who should be allowed inside the garbhgriha, there should be ‌a uniform policy of equal treatment,” ⁢Jain⁤ submitted.

outcome⁢ of the Case

Following the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear ⁤the petition, the petitioner withdrew⁤ the​ case with the option to submit ‍a ‍representation to the relevant authorities. The Madhya Pradesh High Court had ⁣previously ​dismissed Awasthi’s petition‌ on November 28, 2023, as‍ reported by⁢ LiveLaw (https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court-pil-vip-mahakaleshwar-temple-302633).

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Supreme Court, ujjain mahakal temple, VIP Darshan

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service