Supreme Court Responds to Police-Free Verdict in Child Abuse Case
Supreme Court Responds to Acquittal in Papua Child Abuse Case
Table of Contents
- Supreme Court Responds to Acquittal in Papua Child Abuse Case
- Supreme Court’s Response to Papua Child Abuse acquittal: A Q&A
- What is the Supreme Court’s position on the acquittal in the Papua child abuse case?
- What are the next steps for the Supreme Court?
- Has a formal complaint been filed regarding the acquittal?
- what is the role of the Judicial Commission in this case?
- What are the key details of the acquittal?
- Who were the judges involved in the acquittal?
- What was the Public Prosecutor’s recommendation versus the court’s ruling?
- Summary of Key Facts:
The high court says it is indeed aware of the controversial verdict but awaits official reports before taking action.
The Supreme Court has acknowledged awareness of the Jayapura District Court’s decision to acquit Brigadier Alfian Fauzan Hartanto in a child abuse case that occurred in Kaerom Regency, Papua, in 2022. The acquittal was reportedly based on the wishes of witnesses.
We do not know what the decision is like; if it is really free, the Criminal Procedure Code also regulates the free decision,
said a Supreme Court spokesman, Yanto, on Monday.
Yanto indicated that the Supreme Court would not automatically investigate the panel of judges unless a formal complaint is filed. As of Monday, the court had not received any such report.
If there is a report, [it will be] directly followed up,
he stated.
Judicial Commission Involvement
Previously,Methodius Kossay,coordinator of the Papua judicial Commission,stated that the victim’s legal counsel reported the Jayapura District Court judge for the acquittal. The report was delivered to the KY Papua office on March 18.
Yes, that’s right, it has been reported to us at KY representatives of Papua,
kossay confirmed.
Judicial Commission spokesman Mukti Fajar said the commission would analyze the court’s reasoning, specifically the reliance on witness wishes as grounds for acquittal. the commission will also review the evidence presented by the Public Prosecutor during the trial.
In the case of sexual harassment,the judge needs to explore the facts as other evidence,
Fajar said in a written statement.
Fajar added that the Judicial Commission is open to examining other parties who may have information regarding potential violations of the Judge’s Code of Ethics and conduct Guidelines (KEPPH) by the panel of judges.
It is possible that KY will conduct an examination of other relevant parties,
he said.
The Judicial Commission will verify the report to ensure it meets administrative and substantive requirements before registering it.
Details of the Acquittal
Brig. Alfian was acquitted of child sexual abuse charges by a panel of Jayapura District Court judges led by Zaka Talpatty, with members Waroi Korneles and Ronald Lagerboom. The verdict, case number 329/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Japan, was delivered on January 23.
Declared defendant Alfian Fauzan Hartanto alias alfian alias Pian was not proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act as charged with the public prosecutor in the first alternative indictment or the second alternative indictment.
The panel also ordered Alfian’s immediate release from detention.This verdict contrasted sharply with the Public Prosecutor’s demand for a 12-year sentence, a fine of 200 million rupiah, and a six-month confinement.
Supreme Court’s Response to Papua Child Abuse acquittal: A Q&A
What is the Supreme Court’s position on the acquittal in the Papua child abuse case?
The Supreme Court has acknowledged awareness of the Jayapura District Court’s decision to acquit Brigadier Alfian Fauzan Hartanto in a child abuse case. however, the court is awaiting the official reports before taking any action. The Supreme Court spokesman, Yanto, stated that the Supreme Court is aware of the decision but unsure of its specifics, noting that the criminal Procedure Code regulates decisions, including those resulting in acquittal.
What are the next steps for the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court will not automatically investigate the panel of judges involved in the acquittal. An inquiry will only commence if a formal complaint is filed.
Has a formal complaint been filed regarding the acquittal?
As of March 24, 2025, the Supreme Court had not received a formal report regarding the acquittal.Though, the victim’s legal counsel had reported the Jayapura District Court judges to the Papua Judicial Commission.
what is the role of the Judicial Commission in this case?
The Papua Judicial Commission is involved in reviewing the Jayapura District Court’s decision to acquit Brigadier Alfian Fauzan Hartanto. They will analyze the court’s reasoning, particularly the reliance on witness wishes as grounds for acquittal, and review the evidence presented by the Public Prosecutor. Furthermore, the Judicial Commission is open to examining other parties with information regarding potential violations of the Judge’s code of Ethics and conduct guidelines (KEPPH).
What are the key details of the acquittal?
Brigadier Alfian Fauzan Hartanto was acquitted on child sexual abuse charges by a panel of Jayapura District Court judges. The verdict, case number 329/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Japan, was delivered on January 23. The court declared that the defendant was “not proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act.” The panel also ordered his immediate release from detention. This verdict contrasted sharply with the Public Prosecutor’s demand for a 12-year sentence,a fine,and confinement.
Who were the judges involved in the acquittal?
The panel of Jayapura District Court judges involved in the acquittal was led by Zaka Talpatty, with members Waroi Korneles and Ronald Lagerboom.
What was the Public Prosecutor’s recommendation versus the court’s ruling?
The Public Prosecutor demanded a 12-year sentence, a fine of 200 million rupiah, and six months of confinement for Brigadier Alfian Fauzan Hartanto. However, the court acquitted him of all charges and ordered his immediate release.
Summary of Key Facts:
| feature | Details |
| ————————— | ——————————————————————————– |
| Defendant | brigadier Alfian Fauzan Hartanto |
| Charges | Child sexual abuse |
| Court | Jayapura District court |
| Verdict | acquittal |
| Judges | Zaka Talpatty, Waroi Korneles, Ronald Lagerboom |
| Public Prosecutor’s Demand | 12-year sentence, 200 million rupiah fine, 6 months confinement |
| Judicial Commission Involvement | Reviewing the court’s reasoning and evidence presented. |
| | |