Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Supreme Court Seeks Info on Ex-Girlfriend’s Hire

Supreme Court Seeks Info on Ex-Girlfriend’s Hire

March 14, 2025 Catherine Williams News

“`html





Supremo Investigates Contracts‌ of Ábalos’ Ex-Partner in Koldo Case

supremo⁤ Investigates Contracts of ​Ábalos’ ex-Partner in⁣ Koldo Case

Table of Contents

  • supremo⁤ Investigates Contracts of ​Ábalos’ ex-Partner in⁣ Koldo Case
    • Supreme Court Focuses on Employment Details
      • Ineco Asked to Provide Documentation
    • Ábalos and Koldo⁣ Respond
    • Investigation into ⁢Official Trips
    • Money Delivery in Dominican Republic
  • Q&A:‍ supreme Court Investigates Contracts in ⁤Ábalos’ Koldo Case
    • Key Questions ⁢and Answers
      • What ⁤is the Koldo⁤ Case, and who is involved?
      • Why is the Supreme Court investigating Jésica ⁤Rodríguez’s contracts?
      • What specific information is the Supreme Court requesting from Ineco ⁤and ‌Tragsatec?
      • What​ documentation is Ineco specifically required to⁢ provide?
      • What is the ​scope of ⁢the investigation into official trips ⁤taken by Ábalos and Rodríguez?
      • What action is being taken regarding these official trips?
      • Who ‍are Aránzazu‍ Granell and Javier⁤ Serrano, and what ‍is‍ their involvement in the case?
      • What ‌objections were raised⁣ by Ábalos and Koldo, and how did the magistrate respond?
      • Summary of Key Figures and ‌Their Roles

The Supreme ‌Court (Tribunal Supremo​ – TS) has requested details from public companies Ineco​ and Tragsatec regarding the​ hiring of Jésica Rodríguez, ​the‍ former partner‌ of ex-Minister of Transport José Luis Ábalos.The investigation also extends to Óscar Puente, his successor, concerning official trips they took together. ‍This action represents a new set of⁤ inquiries ⁣that includes summoning two new witnesses.

Supreme Court Focuses on Employment Details

Leopoldo Puente, ​the magistrate​ overseeing ⁤the Koldo case⁢ at the TS, referenced Jésica’s testimony​ from February 27,‌ where she stated “gráficamente” that she “no hizo nada” during her ‌two years at Ineco. According to her statement, Ábalos suggested she work⁤ there while finishing her university studies.​ She submitted ‌her resume and was later called for ⁤an interview.

Similarly, ⁤the magistrate noted her ​statement regarding her six-month tenure at Tragsatec,⁣ where she also ⁣claimed she did not perform “actividad ⁣profesional‍ alguna”. Consequently,Ineco and Tragsatec⁢ are required to provide⁣ details on⁣ how Rodríguez’s positions were advertised,the number of applicants,the selection process,and confirmation of whether she underwent ​a job interview and who conducted it.

The court also demands⁣ her employment contract, specifying the start and end dates, “en qué consistían las actividades profesionales encomendadas” to‍ Rodríguez, and “quién ⁣era la persona que ⁢le encargaba⁤ los⁢ concretos trabajos a⁤ desarrollar ⁢y ⁢a la que de forma directa rindiera ‌cuenta”.

Ineco Asked to Provide Documentation

Specifically,⁤ Ineco is instructed to provide all “documentación comprometida en el escrito que remitió a la Fiscalía Anticorrupción”. This includes ​daily work‍ reports, time logs,⁣ and vacation requests,‌ purportedly accounting for⁢ 3,684.23 hours of work.

Regarding Joseba García,brother of Koldo García,who allegedly‍ supervised Rodríguez at Ineco,the⁤ magistrate stated that “en este momento” he sees⁤ no reason to request the same information about ‌him,”sin perjuicio ⁢de ​que,tal y como​ observa‍ el Ministerio Público,en‍ atención a los​ resultados de la investigación seguida en esta causa especial,pudiera ⁤o no resultar procedente hacerlo en el futuro”.

Ábalos and Koldo⁣ Respond

the magistrate ‍addressed​ objections from Ábalos and Koldo, who‍ opposed the inquiries ‌initiated by ⁤the ⁣accusing parties, ⁤unified under the legal direction ‍of the PP.

Puente ‌responded,‍ “A juicio de este instructor, en modo alguno puede sostenerse (…) que ⁤se trate ⁤de ‍unas diligencias de naturaleza prospectiva ni que excedan⁣ el objeto de la presente causa⁤ especial, en la medida en que se refieren ⁢a contratos⁢ celebrados con ⁤la⁢ Administración pública y aparecen vinculados, siempre‍ en los términos indiciarios que resultan propios⁣ de este momento‍ procesal, a ‍varios de los investigados”.

He further‌ added, “Por otro lado, tampoco alcanza a comprenderse la oposición de las⁤ defensas de los señores García y‍ Ábalos a que dichas diligencias sean practicadas sobre la base de que la relación laboral efectiva, que tan rotundamente fue negada ⁢por la ‍testigo, aparezca ya en‍ la ⁢causa suficientemente justificada”.

Investigation into ⁢Official Trips

The investigation also covers official​ trips Jésica rodríguez took with Ábalos, as ⁢stated by her.She mentioned ⁤they ⁢typically took one trip per month, both domestically ‌and internationally, with Ábalos or​ Koldo covering the expenses. ​

The accusing parties ⁢requested “el detalle y justificación,en su caso,de todos los gastos‌ que traigan causa de los viajes realizados por ‍Ábalos⁤ como ministro” ‍and those made by Koldo from the Ministry of Transport.

Puente considers that “la diligencia ⁢interesada excede de forma notable” el objeto de las pesquisas, as he⁤ does not see “motivo ​bastante para sujetar a una suerte de⁣ auditoría global (…) ⁢la totalidad ‌de los viajes oficiales ‍efectuados⁤ por Ábalos durante⁣ el tiempo en​ el que⁤ fue titular⁤ del Ministerio de Transportes, con determinación y justificación de todos los gastos que pudieran haberse efectuado en ellos, ya resultaran imputables al​ propio​ ministro” and ⁢Koldo.

However, he deems it “pertinente” for the Ministry of ⁤Transport and Enduring Mobility to certify the number of official trips ⁤taken by Ábalos during‍ his tenure, where Rodríguez ​may have accompanied him. He ⁢adds, “Igualmente, deberá expresarse, si ​hubiera constancia de ​ello, qué persona, personas o entidad pudieran haber satisfecho los gastos” ‌generated by Rodríguez, addressing the ⁤current minister.

Money Delivery in Dominican Republic

Two new witnesses,‌ Aránzazu Granell ⁤and Javier Serrano,⁢ are summoned for April 2. According to a‌ report by the Central Operative Unit⁣ (UCO) of the Civil Guard, Granell allegedly delivered cash to Joseba García ‍during two trips to the Dominican Republic in 2021.

Agents identify Serrano as ⁢a partner of Víctor de Aldama, the alleged ‌facilitator of⁢ the scheme. He was arrested during UCO operations⁢ in⁤ February⁤ 2024.

The report⁣ indicates that Granell contacted Serrano two days‍ before one of her ‌meetings⁣ with Joseba García, asking how much she should give

Q&A:‍ supreme Court Investigates Contracts in ⁤Ábalos’ Koldo Case

The Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo – TS) is‍ delving⁤ deeper into the Koldo case, focusing on contracts and employment details connected to José Luis‌ Ábalos, former ‍Minister of Transport. This Q&A ​provides comprehensive ‌data about ⁤the key aspects of the investigation.

Key Questions ⁢and Answers

What ⁤is the Koldo⁤ Case, and who is involved?

The Koldo case ​is an investigation into alleged corruption related to government contracts awarded during the‍ COVID-19 pandemic.Key figures include:

  • José Luis Ábalos: Former Minister of Transport.
  • Koldo garcía: His aide and a key figure⁣ in the ⁣alleged scheme.
  • Jésica rodríguez: Ábalos’s former partner, whose employment contracts are under⁢ scrutiny.
  • Óscar Puente: Successor to Ábalos, also under investigation concerning official trips.

Why is the Supreme Court investigating Jésica ⁤Rodríguez’s contracts?

The Supreme court is ⁢investigating Jésica Rodríguez’s employment at public companies Ineco and Tragsatec due to concerns​ about the legitimacy of her​ roles. During testimony, she stated that she “no hizo nada” ‍(did‍ nothing) during​ her time at Ineco. The court seeks to determine whether she was genuinely ‌employed or whether her positions were ‍part of a broader scheme.

What specific information is the Supreme Court requesting from Ineco ⁤and ‌Tragsatec?

The Supreme Court has requested detailed information⁢ regarding ​Jésica Rodríguez’s ‌employment, including:

  • How her positions were advertised: Seeking details on the job postings and⁣ recruitment process.
  • Number of applicants: To understand the‍ competitiveness of her application.
  • Selection process: Steps taken in⁢ selecting Rodríguez.
  • Confirmation of job interview: Whether she had an⁤ interview and who⁢ conducted ‍it.
  • employment‍ contract details: Start and end dates, specific job responsibilities.
  • Assigned tasks and supervisor: Details about her daily work and the person she reported to.

What​ documentation is Ineco specifically required to⁢ provide?

Ineco must provide all “documentación comprometida en el escrito que remitió a la Fiscalía Anticorrupción,” which includes:

  • Daily work reports
  • Time logs
  • vacation⁣ requests

This documentation ‍purportedly accounts for 3,684.23 hours of work.

What is the ​scope of ⁢the investigation into official trips ⁤taken by Ábalos and Rodríguez?

The investigation extends to official ⁤trips ‌taken by Jésica Rodríguez with⁢ Ábalos. Rodríguez mentioned that they typically took one trip per month, both ⁤domestically and internationally, with ‌expenses covered by Ábalos or Koldo. The accusing parties requested details and justification for all expenses related to ⁣these trips.However, the magistrate considers a ​full audit of all ⁣Ábalos’ trips to be ⁤excessive.

What action is being taken regarding these official trips?

The Ministry of Transport and Enduring Mobility is required to certify the number of official trips ‌taken by Ábalos ​during⁣ his tenure where Rodríguez may have accompanied him. They must also indicate who covered Rodríguez’s expenses, if ‌there is record of it.

Who ‍are Aránzazu‍ Granell and Javier⁤ Serrano, and what ‍is‍ their involvement in the case?

Aránzazu ⁤Granell and Javier Serrano are new⁣ witnesses summoned in the case:

  • Aránzazu Granell: Allegedly delivered cash to Joseba García in the Dominican⁤ Republic in 2021.
  • Javier Serrano: Identified as a partner of Víctor de Aldama,the alleged facilitator‍ of ⁣the scheme.

What ‌objections were raised⁣ by Ábalos and Koldo, and how did the magistrate respond?

Ábalos and Koldo objected to⁢ the inquiries initiated by the accusing⁤ parties‌ (unified ‌under the legal ​direction of the PP). However, Magistrate Puente responded that the inquiries were not ⁤exploratory and were ⁢within the scope ‍of⁣ the case⁢ because they relate to contracts with the public governance and are linked to several of the individuals⁢ under ​investigation.

Summary of Key Figures and ‌Their Roles

Figure role Involvement
José Luis Ábalos Former Minister of Transport Central figure; contracts and expenses under scrutiny.
Koldo García Ábalos’s aide Allegedly involved in the‌ scheme; expenses and contracts under scrutiny.
Jésica Rodríguez Ábalos’s former partner Employment contracts and official trips under investigation.
Óscar Puente Current Minister of Transport Investigation ​extends to official trips‌ they took together.
Aránzazu Granell Witness allegedly delivered cash to Joseba‌ García​ in the Dominican⁤ Republic.
Javier Serrano Witness; Partner of‌ Víctor de Aldama Linked to the alleged facilitator ​of the scheme.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service