Delve into the heart of the Ohio state abuse scandal with a critical examination of the Richard Strauss case and the HBO documentary. This powerful exposé uncovers the universityS failures to protect student-athletes, revealing cover-ups and systemic negligence. The primary_keyword, the “Ohio State” abuse scandal, is a difficult but essential watch, highlighting the stories of survivors and the university’s shocking response. Discover how an institution failed those it was meant to protect. The secondary_keyword, “HBO documentary”, presents a detailed exploration of the abuse and the fight for justice. News Directory 3 provides valuable insights on the latest updates on this ongoing civil suit. Uncover the impact of Strauss’s zero remorse for his actions of physical abuse of these students. Examine the lasting effects on survivors and the ongoing legal battles. Discover what’s next in the pursuit of accountability and fair settlements for those who suffered.
Six things to know about the Ohio state abuse scandal
Table of Contents
Updated July 02, 2024
Content warning: This story, and the ‘Surviving
Ohio State
‘ documentary, contain references to and descriptions of sexual abuse and assault that might potentially be disturbing for readers and viewers.
An Ohio State fan shares their perspective on the Richard strauss abuse
scandal and the HBO documentary,”Surviving Ohio state.” Despite a
lifelong love for the Buckeyes, the author balances sports fandom with
awareness of larger issues, expressing outrage over the abuse endured by
ohio State athletes and the university’s response.
The documentary is described as a must-watch, albeit a challenging one.
Here are six key takeaways from “Surviving Ohio State” and the scandal:
Ohio State knew everything, and they covered it up
The documentary highlights numerous instances where Ohio State failed to
protect student-athletes from Strauss. Even routine exams included genital
examinations, causing discomfort among athletes who feared challenging
Strauss due to his authority and potential impact on their scholarships.
Complaints were ignored, and no effort was made to protect the athletes.
Strauss, known for his expertise on anabolic steroids, may have been
administering them to athletes without their consent, further solidifying
his power.
Instead of removing Strauss, the university allowed him to practice at the
student health center, expanding his reach to non-athletes. An Ohio State
investigation revealed 177 male student survivors, concluding that the
university was aware of Strauss’s actions but did nothing to stop him,
resulting in approximately 2,800 survivors.
Despite acknowledging these failures,Ohio State attempted to dismiss the
survivors’ lawsuit based on the statute of limitations,but the court
rejected this argument.
Some survivors have settled, with many having a Most Favored Nations
clause, ensuring they receive the difference if others receive higher
settlements. Continuing to push for fair settlements is crucial to deter
Ohio State from ignoring abuse in the future.
Fencing coach Charlotte Reminyik was the exception
Reminyik, Ohio State’s women’s fencing coach, tried for a decade to get
the university to address Strauss’s abuse.
After male fencers reported inappropriate behavior, Reminyik reported it,
but was told it was hearsay and lacked proof. despite athletes’ fears of
losing scholarships, Reminyik continued to escalate the reports to the
athletic directors.
John Lombardo, medical director of the OSU Sports Medicine Center,
dismissed Reminyik’s complaints as unfounded, despite his obligation
to protect student-athletes.
It wasn’t just wrestlers who survived Strauss’ abuse
Ohio State not only failed to stop Strauss but also promoted him and
allowed him to see patients at the student health center. Stephen
Snyder-Hill, a non-athlete, reported Strauss’s inappropriate sexual
behavior during an exam.
During a meeting with Student Services, Strauss denied the allegations and
gaslit Snyder-Hill. Snyder-Hill agreed to drop the complaint if there
were no other similar complaints, but Student Services lied about it.
Strauss was never reported to the medical board,but he reported Dr. Ted
Grace for questioning his behavior.
Strauss had lockers in various sports’ locker rooms and worked with
athletes from different sports, including hockey. Former OSU hockey player
Al Novakowski was assaulted by Strauss, leading to emotional and mental
health issues and his removal from the team. He was also drugged and
sexually assaulted by Strauss at the student health center.
Wrestling official Frederick feeney shared that he was also a survivor of
Strauss’s sexual assault and harassment. After officiating a match,
Strauss followed Feeney to the shower, masturbated, and inappropriately
touched him.When Feeney spoke to wrestling coaches Hellickson and Jordan,
they dismissed it, saying, “It’s Strauss.”
Strauss had zero remorse
Strauss died by suicide in 2005, citing pain uncontrolled by medication
as the reason, not guilt.
the author finds Strauss’s lack of remorse nauseating and indicative of
his unrepentant predatory nature.
Survivors are not defined by the abuse they endured
The men who have come forward about the abuse they suffered at Ohio State
have faced hate. They were groomed,preyed upon,and trusted a man and
institution they should have been able to trust. What was done to them
does not define them.
Mike DiSabato, the original whistleblower, stated that he will never take
a knee to evil and injustice.
What’s next
the civil suit against Ohio State continues, with survivors seeking fair
settlements and accountability from the university.
