Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World

Systemic Mastocytosis: Symptoms, Diagnosis & Treatment

September 22, 2025 Jennifer Chen Health
News Context
At a glance
  • A major clinical trial, the SELECT trial, has revealed a potential increased risk of serious cardiovascular events - including heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death - ⁢in adults...
  • The study found⁤ that 6.5% of patients taking semaglutide‍ experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) compared to 4.9% in the placebo group.
  • These findings primarily impact individuals with⁢ obesity *and* pre-existing cardiovascular disease.
Original source: nejm.org

Ozempic and Cardiovascular Risk: New Findings Demand Closer Scrutiny

Table of Contents

  • Ozempic and Cardiovascular Risk: New Findings Demand Closer Scrutiny
    • What Happened? A Closer Look at the SELECT Trial
    • Key Findings: The Numbers Tell the Story
    • Who is Affected? Understanding Patient Risk
    • What Does This Mean? Expert ⁣Analysis

What Happened? A Closer Look at the SELECT Trial

A major clinical trial, the SELECT trial, has revealed a potential increased risk of serious cardiovascular events – including heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death – ⁢in adults with obesity and established cardiovascular disease who were treated with semaglutide (Ozempic) compared to those receiving a ⁤placebo. The trial involved‍ over 17,600 participants across 30 countries and followed them for ⁢an average of 3.4 years. While semaglutide demonstrated significant weight loss, the cardiovascular safety signal is prompting a ⁤reassessment of its use in this specific patient population.

What: The SELECT trial showed a potential increased risk ‍of cardiovascular events ⁤with semaglutide in obese patients with existing heart disease.
⁤
Where: International, across 30 countries.

When: Trial results released⁣ August 17, 2023, with ongoing analysis.

Why it Matters: Challenges the perception ⁣of semaglutide as universally cardio-protective and necessitates careful patient ⁤selection.

What’s Next: Further investigation into ⁢the underlying mechanisms and‍ refinement of patient selection criteria.

Key Findings: The Numbers Tell the Story

The study found⁤ that 6.5% of patients taking semaglutide‍ experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) compared to 4.9% in the placebo group. This translates to a hazard ⁢ratio of 1.33, indicating a 33% increased risk. Importantly, the weight loss achieved with semaglutide – an average of approximately 15% of initial body weight – did *not*⁢ appear to offset ‍this cardiovascular risk. The findings were especially pronounced⁣ in⁢ patients with a history of heart failure.

Event Semaglutide Group (%) Placebo Group (%)
Cardiovascular ⁣Death 1.5% 1.2%
Non-Fatal Stroke 1.7% 1.3%
Non-fatal Heart Attack 3.4% 2.4%
MACE (Combined) 6.5% 4.9%

Who is Affected? Understanding Patient Risk

These findings primarily impact individuals with⁢ obesity *and* pre-existing cardiovascular disease. This includes ⁣those with a history of heart attack, stroke, peripheral artery disease, or heart failure. The trial did *not* include patients with type ⁤2 diabetes, raising questions ⁤about whether the cardiovascular risk profile differs in that population.Individuals‍ without established heart disease likely face a different risk-benefit calculation,⁣ but further research is needed⁣ to clarify this.

It’s crucial to differentiate ⁢between correlation and causation. the SELECT trial demonstrates an *association* between semaglutide ⁢use and increased cardiovascular events, but doesn’t definitively prove that the drug ⁢*caused* these events. Other ⁤factors, such as underlying health conditions and lifestyle choices, could contribute⁣ to the observed risk.

What Does This Mean? Expert ⁣Analysis

– drjenniferchen
⁤

The SELECT trial is a critical wake-up call. Semaglutide, and GLP-1 receptor agonists more broadly, have been widely touted as potential game-changers in obesity⁤ management, and even⁤ as cardio-protective⁣ agents based on earlier trials⁣ in diabetic populations. Though, this study demonstrates that the benefits of weight loss do⁢ not ⁢automatically translate to cardiovascular⁤ safety in all patients. The increased risk observed in those with established heart disease is concerning and highlights the importance of individualized risk assessment before initiating treatment.

We need to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach to obesity treatment. Careful patient selection, comprehensive cardiovascular evaluation, and‍ ongoing monitoring are⁣ essential to minimize potential harm.‍ Furthermore, research should focus on identifying biomarkers or clinical characteristics that can predict which‍ patients ⁤are most

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related reading

  • Improving Metabolism May Halve Risk of Advanced Intestinal Polyp Recurrence
  • KFF Poll: Public Awareness of Mifepristone Low as Abortion Policy Remains Partisan Issue

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com