Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Taylor Swift vs Apple: The Music Change - News Directory 3

Taylor Swift vs Apple: The Music Change

June 18, 2025 Catherine Williams Tech
News Context
At a glance
  • Ten years after its debut, the launch of Apple Music remains a landmark moment, shaped in⁣ part by an unexpected advocate: Taylor Swift.
  • Apple's⁤ foray ⁢into streaming began with its $3 billion acquisition of ⁤Beats, motivated by the popularity of Beats Music.
  • However, just before Apple⁢ Music's June 30 launch, Swift publicly criticized Apple's decision not to pay artists during the service's⁢ three-month free trial period.
Original source: 9to5mac.com


Taylor SwiftS Role in Apple Music’s Launch 10 Years later










Key Points

  • Apple acquired Beats for ⁢$3 billion to bolster its streaming capabilities.
  • Taylor⁤ Swift⁣ criticized Apple Music’s initial plan to not pay artists during the free ⁤trial.
  • Eddy cue announced Apple would pay artists during the free trial after Swift’s criticism.
  • Swift then made her ‍album “1989” available on Apple Music.

Taylor Swift’s Role in Apple Music ‍Launch Remembered

⁤Updated June 18, ⁤2025
⁤

Ten years after its debut, the launch of Apple Music remains a landmark moment, shaped in⁣ part by an unexpected advocate: Taylor Swift. As apple prepared to enter the⁤ streaming market, a dispute over artist compensation⁤ threatened to derail its plans.

Apple’s⁤ foray ⁢into streaming began with its $3 billion acquisition of ⁤Beats, motivated by the popularity of Beats Music. The move aimed ⁢to propel⁣ apple into the streaming era, building upon its earlier successes ⁤with the ⁣iPod ⁤and iTunes.

However, just before Apple⁢ Music’s June 30 launch, Swift publicly criticized Apple’s decision not to pay artists during the service’s⁢ three-month free trial period. She announced she would withhold her album⁣ “1989” from⁣ the platform.

Swift⁣ argued, “We don’t ask you for free iPhones. Please don’t ask us to provide ‍you with our ⁤music for no compensation.”

The public pressure ⁣quickly mounted. Apple, seeking to position itself as artist-pleasant, reconsidered its ⁣policy.Eddy Cue, apple’s services boss, announced via Twitter that Apple would indeed pay artists during the free trial.

Apple will always make sure that artist are paid #iTunes #AppleMusic

Cue⁤ added, “#applemusic ⁣will pay artist for streaming, even during customer’s free ⁤trial period. We hear you @taylorswift13 and indie ⁤artists. Love, Apple.”

Swift then reversed her‍ decision, making “1989” available on ⁢Apple Music. Her⁣ role in⁤ the negotiation was widely applauded,averting a potential crisis ‍for the tech giant.

What’s next

The resolution paved the way for Apple Music’s prosperous entry into the streaming market, demonstrating⁢ the notable role artists can play ⁢in shaping industry practices.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related reading

  • Meta Stock Drops After Disappointing Quarterly Guidance
  • How to Transfer Apple Cash to Your Bank Account
  • BTS Boycott 2027 Grammys Over New Best Asian Pop Music Category (time.news)

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com