TaylorMade Sues Callaway Over Golf Ball Marketing
- Acushnet Company and Callaway Golf Company are currently involved in patent litigation concerning golf ball technology, specifically related to hydrodynamics and dimple patterns.
- The legal conflict stems from Acushnet's assertion that Callaway's Chrome Soft golf balls utilize technology protected by several of Acushnet's patents.
- In December 2023, Acushnet filed a lawsuit in the U.S.
Acushnet and Callaway Engage in Patent Litigation
Table of Contents
Acushnet Company and Callaway Golf Company are currently involved in patent litigation concerning golf ball technology, specifically related to hydrodynamics and dimple patterns. The dispute centers on claims that Callaway’s Chrome Soft golf balls infringe on Acushnet’s patents.
Background of the Dispute
The legal conflict stems from Acushnet’s assertion that Callaway’s Chrome Soft golf balls utilize technology protected by several of Acushnet’s patents. Acushnet, the parent company of Titleist and footjoy, alleges that Callaway knowingly copied its patented dimple designs to improve the performance of their golf balls. These patents relate to the specific arrangement and characteristics of dimples on a golf ball, which significantly impact its aerodynamic properties.
In December 2023, Acushnet filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District court for the District of Delaware, accusing Callaway of patent infringement. The complaint details specific patent numbers and alleges that Callaway’s actions constitute willful infringement.
Specific Patents Involved
The lawsuit focuses on several patents held by Acushnet, including U.S. Patent No. 9,265,937, titled “Golf ball with modified dimple patterns,” and others related to dimple geometry and arrangement. These patents cover specific dimple configurations designed to reduce drag and increase lift, resulting in improved distance and flight stability.
According to golf Digest,Acushnet claims the Chrome Soft ball’s dimple pattern directly copies elements of their patented technology.
callaway’s Response and Counterclaims
Callaway has responded to the lawsuit, denying the allegations of patent infringement.They argue that their Chrome Soft golf balls do not infringe on Acushnet’s patents and that Acushnet’s patents are invalid.
In February 2024, Callaway filed counterclaims against Acushnet, alleging that acushnet is attempting to stifle competition and maintain a monopoly in the golf ball market. Law360 reported that Callaway’s counterclaims accuse Acushnet of anti-competitive practices.
Current Status (as of january 29, 2026)
As of January 29, 2026, the litigation is ongoing. The case is currently in the discovery phase, with both sides exchanging information and preparing for potential trial. There have been no major rulings or settlements reported as of this date. The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) is monitoring the case, as patent disputes involving golf ball technology have previously led to import restrictions.
Recent court filings indicate a trial is tentatively scheduled for late 2026, but this date is subject to change. No new developments have been reported as December 2025, when both companies completed initial document production.