Tecnocracia islamista: cómo se hizo fuerte HTS, el grupo que lidera el cambio en Siria | Internacional
A New Syria? Former Rebels Embrace Bureaucracy in Idlib
Table of Contents
- A New Syria? Former Rebels Embrace Bureaucracy in Idlib
- Syrian Opposition Leaders Seek to Replicate Idlib Model in Aleppo
- Idlib’s Conversion: From War zone to Bastion of Stability Under HTS Rule
- From Battlefield to bureaucracy: How HTS Became a Power player in Syria
- Idlib’s Transformation: A Glimmer of Hope or a Mirage?
IDLIB, SYRIA – After years as a refugee in Lebanon, rami recently returned to his hometown of Idlib, a city in northwestern Syria.He was struck by the efficiency and kindness he encountered while renewing his ID card. “I was so surprised,” Rami said, “I told the director, ‘If you keep treating us this well, we’ll get used to it!'”
This sentiment, a mix of disbelief and cautious optimism, is echoing throughout Idlib. For decades, Syrians have associated their government with corruption, endless bureaucracy, and fear. Checkpoints were dreaded, often requiring bribes and carrying the risk of detention or forced military service.
Now, the landscape is changing.Hayat Tahrir al Sham (HTS), a Salafist militant group that seized control of Idlib after ousting President Bashar al-Assad, is implementing a surprising strategy: embracing institutions.
“The Syrian revolution has won,” declared Abu Mohamad al Julani, HTS leader, now using his real name, ahmed Husein al Shara. “But Syria cannot be led with a revolutionary mindset. We need laws and institutions.”
This shift is evident in the Alepo Provincial Government building, a towering structure scarred by years of fighting. Inside, a bearded HTS policeman guards the entrance, while a clean-shaven former regime official serves tea. A triumvirate from Idlib has taken charge, attempting to revive the administration.
While they estimate that 95% of officials have returned to their posts, they acknowledge the challenges ahead. “We are trying to preserve and utilize the existing structures,” one official explained. “But corruption and nepotism were rampant under the Assad regime, so we don’t even know how many employees we have.”
the success of HTS’s institutional approach remains to be seen. However, for many Syrians, the mere possibility of a functioning government, free from the abuses of the past, is a glimmer of hope in a country ravaged by war.
Syrian Opposition Leaders Seek to Replicate Idlib Model in Aleppo
Aleppo, Syria – A new leadership triumvirate in Aleppo, formed by opposition figures Fawaz al Helal, Abd al Wahab Daas, and Zakaria Lababidi, aims to implement the governance model established by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) in Idlib province. This move comes as the Syrian civil war enters its twelfth year, with Aleppo, once Syria’s largest city, still bearing the scars of intense fighting.
The trio, who assumed interim control of Aleppo’s provincial delegation last Sunday, believe the Idlib model offers a viable path forward for the war-torn region. “We want to apply the experience we have gained in Idlib, without violating any laws,” explains al Helal. Daas adds, “We aim to introduce the model and the experience we have followed in Idlib.”
Idlib, a small, conservative province bordering Turkey, fell under HTS control in 2019 after the group defeated other Islamist and rebel factions. HTS established the “Salvation Government” to administer the province.
During a 2020 visit to Idlib, this publication observed a region grappling with severe challenges. Basic services like water and electricity were scarce, mobile phone coverage was limited, and employment opportunities were virtually nonexistent. The province’s 3.5 million inhabitants, two-thirds of whom were internally displaced, struggled to survive.
The new leadership in Aleppo hopes to replicate Idlib’s governance structure, which, despite its limitations, has provided a semblance of stability and order in a region ravaged by conflict. Though, it remains to be seen whether this model can be successfully implemented in aleppo, a city with a vastly diffrent demographic and political landscape.
The success of this endeavor hinges on several factors, including the ability of the new leadership to secure international support, address the humanitarian needs of Aleppo’s residents, and navigate the complex web of political and military factions operating in the region.
The coming months will be crucial in determining whether the Idlib model can offer a viable path towards peace and stability in Aleppo and, potentially, other parts of war-torn Syria.
Idlib’s Conversion: From War zone to Bastion of Stability Under HTS Rule
Idlib, syria – Once synonymous with chaos and destruction, the northwestern Syrian province of Idlib is undergoing a remarkable transformation. Under the administration of the Hayat tahrir al-Sham (HTS) government, the region has seen a surge in stability, infrastructure development, and a renewed sense of normalcy.
The change is palpable. Gone are the ubiquitous tents housing displaced families, replaced by newly constructed homes. Supermarkets are stocked with goods, even boasting the latest iPhone models. Workshops and factories hum with activity, and two local mobile phone companies have emerged.
“It’s all so different now,” says Rahiha, a 50-year-old woman who recently returned to Idlib. “It’s more civilized, there’s more security. I’m proud of the men in charge.”
The streets, once patrolled by a patchwork of militias, are now overseen by the HTS-affiliated police force in their new vehicles. While HTS’s origins are rooted in jihadist ideology, its governance in Idlib has taken on a distinctly pragmatic tone.
mohamed al asmar,head of communications for the HTS government’s Ministry of Media,emphasizes the group’s commitment to good governance. “We have instructed our personnel not to accept bribes and to build trust with the population,” he says. “Even in a state of war, we developed the province, and people saw they could rely on us.”
The HTS government, according to al Asmar, is chosen through a council of notables and representatives from various professions, all men. While this structure may not be representative of HTS’s ultimate vision for Syria, al Asmar insists that elections will be held once the war subsides.
“We couldn’t hold elections in the context of war, but that has changed,” he promises.
Even religious leaders, who might be expected to be wary of an Islamist government, express cautious optimism.
“What gives me hope is that they are educated people,” says Denys Antoine Shahda, the Syriac Catholic Archbishop. “Although some outside say they are a terrorist group, we haven’t seen that here. We’ve spoken with dignified and cultured individuals.”
This shift towards pragmatism is attributed to HTS leader Ahmed al Shara’s strategic approach, according to Syrian analyst Haid Haid.
“He uses a gradual strategy that mixes patience, coercion, and persuasion,” Haid writes on X (formerly Twitter). “This has allowed him to implement his objectives step by step, adapting to the population’s reactions to minimize negative responses.”
A key example of this strategy is HTS’s approach to religious minorities. In Idlib, the group has returned land and restored shrines belonging to druze and Christian communities, a stark contrast to the actions of other islamist militant groups.
While the future of Idlib and HTS’s role in Syria remain uncertain, the province’s transformation offers a glimpse into the potential for pragmatic governance even in the moast challenging circumstances.
From Battlefield to bureaucracy: How HTS Became a Power player in Syria
Idlib, Syria – In the war-torn landscape of Syria, hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) has emerged as a dominant force, controlling the northwestern province of idlib. Once a radical offshoot of al-Qaeda, HTS has undergone a transformation, evolving into a complex entity that governs, provides services, and maintains a formidable military presence.
This evolution is largely attributed to the leadership of Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, known within HTS as “Al Shara.” A seasoned commander who has led the group as its days as the Nusra Front, Al Shara is described by those who know him as a “charismatic and intelligent” leader who is open to criticism and willing to engage in dialog.
“He is a leader, not a dictator,” says a source close to HTS, who requested anonymity.”when his leadership has been questioned, he has offered to step down, but his commanders have always ultimately reaffirmed their support.”
While HTS still harbors elements of radical Islamism, Al Shara has worked to steer the group away from exporting jihad, differentiating it from more extreme groups like ISIS.
“There are two types of jihad,” explains the source. “Expansive jihad, which aims to spread Islam to other countries, is no longer necessary because everyone has access to details online. Defensive jihad, on the other hand, was necessary to protect ourselves from the Assad regime.”
HTS’s military prowess is undeniable. The group has repeatedly defeated Syrian government forces, despite being substantially outnumbered and outgunned. This success can be attributed to years of training,a strict hierarchical structure,and a military academy established in Idlib.
Furthermore, HTS has cultivated a reputation for discipline and integrity, contrasting sharply with other rebel groups plagued by infighting and corruption.
“Turkey has seen the difference between our model and the territories they support, which are governed by other groups,” the source says. “they have seen the difference in governance, economy… so relations with Turkey have improved.”
While HTS denies receiving direct financial support from Turkey, the group’s funding primarily comes from taxes, import duties, and trade, including the smuggling of goods into regime-controlled areas.
“Our weapons are Russian, captured from the Syrian army,” the source adds.
Some analysts, like Turkish academic Selim Koru, believe that the influence of Turkish Islamists is evident in HTS’s approach.
“The lesson of the AKP [Turkey’s ruling party] is to conceal one’s Islamism and take a gradual approach,” Koru observes.
As HTS continues to consolidate its power in Idlib, its future trajectory remains uncertain. Will it maintain its pragmatic approach, or will its more radical elements reassert themselves? The answer will have significant implications for the ongoing Syrian conflict and the wider region.
Idlib’s Transformation: A Glimmer of Hope or a Mirage?
By: [Your Name]
Newsdirect3.com
The Syrian civil war has raged for over a decade, leaving a trail of devastation and despair across the country. But amidst the rubble and ruins, a surprising narrative is emerging from the northwestern province of Idlib. Under the control of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a former Salafist militant group, Idlib is undergoing a remarkable transformation, leaving many to wonder if this could be a blueprint for a “new Syria.”
From Chaos to Stability:
Our correspondent on the ground reports a stark contrast between the Idlib of today and the war-torn province of yesterday. Gone are the makeshift camps and ubiquitous checkpoints. Instead, newly constructed homes dot the landscape, supermarkets brim with goods, and workshops hum with activity.
HTS, once associated with extremist ideology, has adopted a pragmatic approach to governance, focusing on restoring basic services and ensuring security. This has earned them the cautious praise of even religious leaders who initially feared their rule.
A Model for aleppo?
Inspired by the relative stability in Idlib, opposition leaders in Aleppo are now seeking to replicate the HTS model. They hope to establish a similar governance structure, bringing much-needed order and security to the battered city.
Challenges and Uncertainties:
While the transformation in Idlib is undeniable,it’s crucial to acknowledge the challenge of replicating this success elsewhere. Aleppo, with its diverse population and complex political landscape, presents a different set of hurdles.
Moreover,HTS’s origins remain rooted in extremism,and questions linger about the group’s long-term political ambitions. While they claim to believe in elections, their promise hasn’t materialized yet.
A Glimmer of Hope?
Despite the uncertainties, the developments in Idlib offer a glimmer of hope in a country ravaged by war.
The success of the Idlib model, should it be replicable, could provide a blueprint for rebuilding Syria, albeit one with a unique set of challenges and complexities.
Moving Forward:
It’s too early to declare Idlib a success story, but it undeniably presents a fascinating case study. As the Syrian conflict enters its twelfth year, we will continue to track developments in Idlib and Aleppo, providing our readers with insightful analysis and on-the-ground reporting.
