The Future of the African Union Commission: Defining Goals Ahead of 2025 Elections
The African Union Commission at a Crossroads
Upcoming Elections for New Commissioners
In February 2025, the African Union (AU) will hold elections for new commissioners. Member states must consider the type of commission needed to support the goals of Agenda 2063.
Agenda 2063 Overview
Adopted in 2014, Agenda 2063 outlines a vision for African growth and development. However, it lacks specifics on how the AU Commission will achieve these goals. As the AU plays a bigger role in foreign policy, especially after joining the G20 in 2023, it must redefine the commission’s roles and ambitions.
Missed Opportunities for Reform
The AU’s institutional reform process, launched in 2017, did not provide a clear vision for the commission. Instead, it exposed the ongoing struggles between the commission and the Permanent Representatives Committee, which includes member country representatives. Many perceive the commission as inefficient, and past reforms aimed to reduce its size and improve financial accountability and efficiency.
Current Challenges
Despite some departmental growth, the commission still faces capacity and efficiency issues. Member states prefer a commission that operates reactively and responds to their needs, avoiding a more independent body that engages proactively in conflict prevention.
The Intergovernmental Nature of the AU
The AU remains intergovernmental, focusing on cooperation but hindered by low trade and cultural collaboration levels among African nations. The AU claims to represent ordinary citizens. However, many people have limited interaction with its processes, despite initiatives aimed at increasing youth involvement and forming a Pan-African Parliament.
Calls for Citizen Engagement
To redefine the commission’s direction, broader consultations are essential. These should include input from everyday citizens, not just government and civil society elites. Such engagement will reflect public perceptions and expectations of the AU.
Directions Ahead
As the elections approach, member states need to define the desired nature of the AU Commission. Questions about priorities, such as the free movement of people and the feasibility of an African union, must be addressed.
Conclusion
Member states can identify what they do not want for the AU commission, but they must also articulate a clear vision for its future. The direction of the AU Commission hinges on a collective decision that incorporates the voices of African citizens.
