Tigres’ Controversial Goal Eliminates Necaxa
- MONTERREY, Mexico – A dramatic and controversial goal in stoppage time propelled Tigres past Necaxa in the Liga MX quarterfinals.
- The sequence began with a ball into the penalty area, headed by Tigres goalkeeper Nahuel Guzmán.
- Referee Ortiz initially disallowed the goal before consulting with the Video Assistant referee (VAR).
Controversial Goal Sends Tigres Past Necaxa in Liga MX Quarterfinals
Table of Contents
- Controversial Goal Sends Tigres Past Necaxa in Liga MX Quarterfinals
- Controversial Goal Sends Tigres Past Necaxa in Liga MX Quarterfinals: Your Questions Answered
- What happened in the Tigres vs. Necaxa Liga MX Quarterfinal match?
- What was the controversial sequence of events that led to the Tigres goal?
- When did the controversial goal occur?
- Why was the goal considered controversial?
- What is VAR and how did it influence the final decision?
- What where the immediate reactions to the referee’s decision?
- What did arbitration experts say about the controversial call?
- Did the controversy affect the outcome of the match?
- Summary of Key Points in the Tigres vs. Necaxa match:
MONTERREY, Mexico – A dramatic and controversial goal in stoppage time propelled Tigres past Necaxa in the Liga MX quarterfinals. The match, which ended in a 2-2 draw, saw Tigres advance, leaving Necaxa players and fans disputing the validity of the decisive score.
The sequence began with a ball into the penalty area, headed by Tigres goalkeeper Nahuel Guzmán. Necaxa’s defence initially cleared the ball off the line after a save by goalkeeper A dovas. However, in the ensuing scramble, Necaxa defender Mayorga inadvertently knocked the ball into his own net, tying the game for UANL.
VAR Intervention Sparks Debate
Referee Ortiz initially disallowed the goal before consulting with the Video Assistant referee (VAR). After a lengthy review, Ortiz reversed his decision and awarded the goal to Tigres.
Necaxa players immediately protested the decision, alleging that Nico Ibáñez fouled their goalkeeper during the goalmouth scramble. They also claimed that Purata pushed Badaloni earlier in the play.
Arbitration Experts Weigh In
The controversial play resulted in Necaxa’s elimination, and opinions are divided regarding the referee’s decision. Some former referees have taken to social media to express their views.
Felipe Ramos Rizo stated on social media, “You don’t need so much time to decide.”
Well canceled the goal of Tigres, Pushing about Badaloni, kicking on the goalkeeper by Ibáñez.
Guerrero, via social media
Marco Antonio Rodríguez commented, “Ortiz is certainly one of the few referees in the world with an authority profile but at the most important and decisive moment it still decides with VAR.”
Controversial Goal Sends Tigres Past Necaxa in Liga MX Quarterfinals: Your Questions Answered
What happened in the Tigres vs. Necaxa Liga MX Quarterfinal match?
The Liga MX quarterfinal match between Tigres and Necaxa ended in a 2-2 draw,but a highly controversial goal in stoppage time propelled Tigres to advance. This decisive score came after a series of events in the penalty area that led to heated debate and protest from Necaxa players and fans.
What was the controversial sequence of events that led to the Tigres goal?
The sequence began with Tigres goalkeeper Nahuel Guzmán heading a ball into the Necaxa penalty area.Although Necaxa’s defense initially cleared the ball off the line after a save by goalkeeper A dovas,a scramble ensued. In this scramble, Necaxa defender Mayorga inadvertently knocked the ball into his own net, tying the game for Tigres.
When did the controversial goal occur?
The controversial goal occurred in stoppage time, adding to the dramatic nature of the match and controversy surrounding the final result.
Why was the goal considered controversial?
The goal was initially disallowed by the referee, Ortiz, before being awarded after a VAR review. this sparked immediate protests from Necaxa players who alleged that Nico Ibáñez fouled their goalkeeper during the goalmouth scramble, and also claimed that Purata pushed Badaloni earlier in the play.
What is VAR and how did it influence the final decision?
VAR, or Video Assistant Referee, is a system used in soccer to review certain on-field decisions made by the referee using video replays. In this case, Referee Ortiz consulted with the VAR after initially disallowing the goal. After a lengthy review, Ortiz reversed his initial decision and awarded the goal to Tigres.
What where the immediate reactions to the referee’s decision?
Necaxa players immediately protested the decision, disputing the validity of the goal. Their claims centered on a foul by Nico Ibáñez on their goalkeeper and a push by Purata earlier in the play. The decision resulted in Necaxa’s elimination from the tournament.
What did arbitration experts say about the controversial call?
Opinions among arbitration experts were divided. Some former referees shared their views on social media, adding to the debate:
Felipe Ramos Rizo: Stated, “You don’t need so much time to decide.”
marco Antonio Rodríguez: Commented, “Ortiz is certainly one of the few referees in the world with an authority profile but at the most important and decisive moment it still decides with VAR.”
Did the controversy affect the outcome of the match?
Yes,the controversial goal directly impacted the outcome. Since the match ended in a 2-2 draw, the goal awarded to Tigres allowed them to advance in the Liga MX quarterfinals, leading to Necaxa’s elimination.
Summary of Key Points in the Tigres vs. Necaxa match:
| Feature | Description |
| —————— | —————————————————————————————- |
| match Result | 2-2 draw,Tigres advanced |
| Controversial goal | Scored in stoppage time,own goal by Necaxa defender after scramble |
| Initial Ruling | Goal disallowed by referee Ortiz |
| VAR Intervention | Referee reviewed the play with VAR and reversed his initial decision,awarding the goal |
| Necaxa Protest | Alleged foul on goalkeeper,push on Badaloni prior to the own goal |
| Expert Opinions | Divided opinions among former referees on the decision and VAR usage |