Trump Admin Bypasses U.S. Immigration Law
- Since taking office in January,the Trump administration has implemented a series of immigration measures targeting asylum seekers,undocumented migrants,and foreigners with legal status,raising concerns among legal experts and human...
- 20, president Trump reaffirmed his campaign promise to pursue mass deportations, potentially affecting up to 11 million undocumented immigrants.
- Kathleen Vannucci, an immigration law professor at Northwestern University, described the administration's actions as "constant attacks against immigrants, unlike anything we have seen before." According to Just Security,...
Trump GovernanceS Immigration Policies Face Scrutiny
Since taking office in January,the Trump administration has implemented a series of immigration measures targeting asylum seekers,undocumented migrants,and foreigners with legal status,raising concerns among legal experts and human rights organizations.
Sweeping Changes on Day One
On Jan. 20, president Trump reaffirmed his campaign promise to pursue mass deportations, potentially affecting up to 11 million undocumented immigrants. That same day,his administration initiated multiple immigration policy changes,including declaring an “invasion” at the U.S.-Mexico border and proposing an end to birthright citizenship, a move facing legal challenges.
Kathleen Vannucci, an immigration law professor at Northwestern University, described the administration’s actions as “constant attacks against immigrants, unlike anything we have seen before.” According to Just Security, a New York University project tracking legal challenges to the federal government, the Trump administration has faced over 50 legal actions related to its immigration policies in its first 100 days.
Asylum System Under Pressure
The administration’s initial actions considerably impacted the U.S. asylum system. On Jan. 20, a policy implemented under the Biden administration, which allowed migrants to schedule appointments to apply for asylum at the border, was rescinded. The New York Times reported that this decision led to the cancellation of approximately 30,000 interviews.Furthermore, through a decree, Trump effectively ended asylum applications at the Mexican border. Amnesty International has condemned this as a “violation” of U.S. obligations under refugee and human rights laws.

vannucci emphasized the right to seek asylum nonetheless of entry method. While noting previous “erosion” of this right under both the Trump and Biden administrations, she characterized the latest decisions as unprecedented.
The Trump administration dose not believe that all these individuals can benefit from protection. There is this preconceived idea that they lie.
Kathleen Vannucci, immigration law specialist
Temporary Protected status Targeted
The Trump administration is also moving to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for immigrants from countries facing dangerous conditions. In late January, the government revoked an extension of TPS for Venezuelans.
Expulsion Concerns and Legal Challenges
Moud Khalil, a permanent resident, is reportedly facing expulsion due to his pro-Palestinian views. The New York Times has noted that permanent residents generally cannot be deported for their political stances. Khalil’s case involves alleged violations of due process, and he is currently detained in Louisiana, similar to Rumeysa Ozturk.
Shannon Shepherd, a lawyer specializing in foreign law, told franceinfo that the government is attempting to expedite expulsion procedures. “My colleagues tell me about accelerated procedures that should not be,” Shepherd said, adding, “there is a precedent for a long time, according to which everyone in the United States is entitled to regular procedure,” even in expulsion cases.
We see blatant violations of this right, things that go beyond reason.
Shannon Shepherd, lawyer specializing in foreign law
Controversial Tactics
The administration has considered sending migrants to Guantanamo Bay and using military sites for processing. Donald Trump invoked a 1798 law concerning “foreign enemies”—previously used only in wartime—to expel over 200 migrants accused of belonging to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. Even though a federal judge temporarily halted these deportations, the administration allegedly “deliberately ignored” the ruling. Some migrants, reportedly arrested based on tattoos, were sent to a terrorist detention center in El Salvador for at least a year.
According to CBS, 75% of those deported to El Salvador had no criminal record in the U.S. While some are accused of serious crimes,others include a gay asylum seeker and Kilmar Abrego Garcia,a Salvadoran man deported due to an “administrative error.” Despite a 2019 court order protecting Garcia from deportation due to potential “persecution” in El Salvador, the administration claimed he was a member of the MS-13 gang.
Looking Ahead
The New York Times reports that expulsion levels remain consistent with the end of the Biden presidency.However,Shannon Shepherd fears the administration is “ready to go far.” Colleen Putzel-Kavanaugh echoed this sentiment, stating the government seems “persistent to test a large number of new things” to achieve its goals.
