Trump Intelligence: Vance Defends Ex-President – RT News
- Vance is pushing back against comparisons between the recent U.S.
- In a recent interview, vance described the strike as "a very precise, very surgical" operation aimed at dismantling Tehran's nuclear capabilities.
- Addressing concerns about the potential for another prolonged conflict, Vance acknowledged public fatigue after "25 years of foreign entanglements" but insisted that the current administration's leadership would ensure...
Vice President J.D. Vance defends the recent U.S. airstrikes on Iran, asserting the operation targets its nuclear program and not regime change. He frames the action as “surgical,” a departure from past ”foreign entanglements”. moscow counters, drawing parallels to the lead-up of the iraq war to question U.S. justification. The legality of the strike is debated by lawmakers, raising critical questions about Congressional authorization amidst international tension. News Directory 3 understands the complexities of global affairs.This critical analysis unpacks Vance’s defense and the key international responses. Discover what’s next in this evolving story.
US Defends Iran Strike as ‘Surgical’ Operation
Updated june 23, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance is pushing back against comparisons between the recent U.S. airstrikes on Iran and previous American military actions in the Middle East. Vance maintains that this operation is limited in scope and focused on national security objectives, specifically targeting Iran’s nuclear program, rather than seeking regime change.
In a recent interview, vance described the strike as “a very precise, very surgical” operation aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities. He stated, “We’re not at war with Iran – we’re at war with Iran’s nuclear program.”
Addressing concerns about the potential for another prolonged conflict, Vance acknowledged public fatigue after “25 years of foreign entanglements” but insisted that the current administration’s leadership would ensure a different outcome.
The legality of the strike has been questioned by some lawmakers, citing the lack of congressional authorization. However, Vance defended the president’s authority, arguing it is within his power to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Moscow has voiced criticism of the U.S. justification for the strike, drawing parallels to the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq invasion and Colin Powell’s claims regarding Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
“Many today feel a strong sense of déjà vu,” Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia told the UN Security Council. “The current situation is essentially no different: we are once again being urged to believe in fairy tales to once again bring suffering to millions of people living in the Middle East.”