Trump National Guard Deployment Ruled Illegal
- A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump's move to federalize the California National Guard in response to anti-immigration demonstrations in Los Angeles.
- Breyer stated the president's actions exceeded his statutory authority and violated the Tenth Amendment.
- The legal battle highlights the ongoing tension between the federal government and California over immigration policy and the role of the National Guard.
A federal judge has swiftly blocked donald Trump’s attempt to federalize the California National Guard amid anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles. This ruling immediately returns control of the Guard to Governor Gavin Newsom, a significant victory for California. The court found Trump’s actions exceeded his authority, highlighting the vital role of checks and balances. This decision,stemming from debates about federalization and immigration,could set a precedent. Judge Breyer underscored the difference between constitutional governance and executive overreach. Newsom rightly celebrated the win. this is a developing story you can read about on News Directory 3, with the upcoming June 20 hearing set to determine the longevity of this injunction and implications for future events. Discover what’s next …
Judge Blocks Trump’s National Guard Deployment in California
Updated june 12, 2025
A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump’s move to federalize the California National Guard in response to anti-immigration demonstrations in Los Angeles. U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer granted California’s request for a temporary restraining order, returning control of the Guard to Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Breyer stated the president’s actions exceeded his statutory authority and violated the Tenth Amendment. The ruling is scheduled to take effect at noon PDT Friday. A hearing regarding a preliminary injunction is set for June 20.
The legal battle highlights the ongoing tension between the federal government and California over immigration policy and the role of the National Guard. The decision underscores the importance of checks and balances in the U.S. system, especially concerning the federalization of state military resources during times of civil unrest and immigration debates.
“That’s the difference between a constitutional government and King George. it’s not that a leader can simply say something and then it becomes it,” Breyer said during Thursday’s hearing.
Newsom responded to the ruling on X, stating, “The court just confirmed what we all know—the military belongs on the battlefield, not on our city streets. This win is not just for California, but the nation.” he further criticized Trump,calling the ruling “a check on a man whose authoritarian tendencies are increasing by the day.”
trump, in turn, posted on Truth Social, criticizing Newsom’s handling of the situation in Los Angeles. He claimed the city would be “burning to the ground” without his intervention.
What’s next
The upcoming hearing on June 20 will determine whether a preliminary injunction will be issued, potentially extending the block on the president’s authority over the California National Guard. The case could set a precedent for future disputes regarding the use of federal troops in response to state-level protests.