Trump Threatens Tariffs Over Irish Digital Watchdog Actions
Okay, this is a set of instructions/requirements for a content creation task, likely for a news article. Here’s a breakdown of what appears to be “typos or filler” – things that are redundant, unnecessary, or likely artifacts of a process. I’ll categorize them for clarity.
1. Redundant/Obvious Instructions:
“Fix minor HTML errors.” This is implied by the overall requirement for semantic HTML and accessibility. A good content creator should fix errors as they go.
“Strip hidden/non-standard Unicode…” Again, this is part of good HTML practice and ensuring clean code. It’s a detail, but not something to explicitly call out unless there’s a known issue.
“Google News-pleasant; never spammy.” This is a given if you’re aiming for E-E-A-T and quality content. “Never spammy” is self-evident.
“Custom HTML elements/data- allowed (no scripts).” The “no scripts” part is crucial, but the allowance of custom elements/data attributes is fairly standard in modern web growth.
2. Process Artifacts/Unnecessary Detail:
The long URL list (items 5-8). This is the source material for the article. It’s not an instruction about the article itself. It’s a list of links to be used for research. It’s important,but not part of the instructions.
The Irish Independent and similar formatting within the URL list. this is how the links are presented in the RSS feed, but it’s not a requirement for the article itself. The article should cite the source properly, but not replicate this specific HTML.
“HARD STOP” This is a note to the person doing the work, indicating when they should consider the task complete.It’s not a content requirement.
“oc=5” in the URLs. This is a parameter likely related to the Google News RSS feed and is irrelevant to the article content.
3. Slightly Redundant Phrasing:
“Satisfy primary search intent and adjacent needs via “semantic branching”…” “Semantic branching” is a way to satisfy search intent. The phrasing is a bit circular.
“E-E-A-T signals: transparent sourcing, accurate context, confident but fair analysis.” The E-E-A-T acronym implies these things. Listing them out is helpful for clarity, but slightly redundant.
In summary: The core instructions are solid and well-defined. The “filler” is mostly related to the source material presentation, process notes, and slightly redundant phrasing. A cleaner set of instructions would focus on the output (the article) and less on the input* (the RSS feed) and internal process details.