Home » News » Trump’s Crypto Gamble: A Foreign Affairs Analysis

Trump’s Crypto Gamble: A Foreign Affairs Analysis

The dollar’s dominance⁢ has survived its de-pegging from gold, decades of deteriorating fiscal discipline by the U.S.government, and active efforts ‌by criminals, terrorists, and foreign ‍governments to find alternative forms of ​payment. That dominance has kept the United States’ borrowing costs manageable as its debts mount. But now this central pillar of U.S. economic stability and geopolitical influence faces a⁣ fresh challenge from digital‌ alternatives.

During ‌his first term, U.S. President ‍Donald Trump often called the cryptocurrency industry a scam.By now,however,his family has plunged money into it-and ‍his administration has bet that so-called U.S. dollar stablecoins, or privately issued cryptocurrencies regulated by the U.S. government and backed primarily by ⁣cash and other safe dollar assets, can reinforce the dollar’s role as the world’s primary reserve currency. After backing last summer’s passage ⁤of the Genius Act, which sets out a regulatory framework for dollar stablecoins, Trump has championed the United States as a world leader in the ⁣industry.

Unbacked cryptocurrencies can be volatile,limiting their uptake. But ‌stablecoins, which emerged about a decade⁣ ago, promise to reduce this risk, lower transaction costs for multinational firms, and offer financial services to people who cannot otherwise access bank accounts. If the stablecoin market expands dramatically and remains dollar-denominated (increasing demand for U.S. debt), that, in turn, could reinforce dollar dominance and the considerable power it affords the United states. It would make‍ U.S. financial sanctions more effective and cement Washington’s influence in setting the standards for a new financial frontier.

But those benefits are not guaranteed as the stablecoin market grows. Dollar-denominated⁢ stablecoin issuers can be‍ based⁣ anywhere, meaning that ​U.S.regulators will depend on⁣ the cooperation of‌ a ⁢vast ‍array of foreign counterparts to ensure that these⁢ new forms of ⁤dollars are just as trustworthy as bank deposits or good old cash. Enforcing regulations on stablecoins would be a mammoth task in the best of times, but it will be further complicated ⁤by the Trump administration’s policy unpredictability, antagonistic approach to trade, and distaste for⁤ regulation.Rather of collaborating with the United States to further entrench dollar dominance, even the friendliest U.S.allies may turn ‌a blind eye to unscrupulous operators or undercut dollar stablecoins by giving preference to digital currencies issued‍ by their own central banks. unless Washington works deliberately and diligently to coordinate enforcement of U.S. rules, the technology may only accelerate the fragmentation⁣ of global financial‍ markets.

CURRENCY SWAP

Trump has⁢ advanced conflicting views on whether dollar dominance serves the U.S. national interest. During his 2024 presidential campaign, he⁢ argued that the ‌dollar’s preeminent role as the ⁤world’s currency has distorted its exchange rate and hurt U.S. businesses’⁢ competitiveness. Onc ‌he became president, he⁤ vowed to punish countries that tried to ​undermine the dollar’s dominance, although this so far remains an empty‌ threat.

But markets, ⁤not individual leaders, largely determine⁢ which currencies offer the best store of ⁢value and most ‍reliable‌ means of ⁢exchange. The United States still boasts the deepest and most complex financial markets, the world’s most innovative companies, and a largely autonomous set ⁢of courts and regulators, all of which continue to undergird dollar dominance. Dollars still account for more ‍than half of global foreign⁤ exchange reserves and export invoicing and roughly 90 percent of foreign ⁢currency transactions.

Dollar reserves have been in decline since roughly 2000, however, when they represented nearly 70 ‌percent of total holdings.Some of‍ this shift simply represents a natural effort by countries to diversify their holdings. But Washington’s unpredictability-and its efforts to use its economic might to sanction or even bully friends and also rivals-has triggered an accelerating‌ search for alternatives. China has sought to boost the usage of the ⁤renminbi through its Belt and Road loans and central bank swap lines. chinese and Russian regulators have‍ established alternative payment systems to bypass the Western-dominated SWIFT network.Europe‍ even attempted ⁤a barter-like experiment to trade with Iran after the first Trump administration reimposed sanctions. European officials⁣ are now exploring ways to reduce their markets’ overwhelming dependence on U.S.firms such as Mastercard and Visa for payment flows.

Stablecoins are meant to be as reliable as cash in a wallet.

But the biggest challenge to the

Stablecoin Risks and Regulatory concerns

Stablecoins, cryptocurrencies⁤ designed to maintain a stable value relative to a conventional asset like the U.S. dollar, face increasing scrutiny regarding their⁣ operational resilience and potential ‌for regulatory violations. While intended⁣ to provide stability within the volatile cryptocurrency market, concerns exist⁤ about their ability to handle large-scale ‍redemptions and the possibility of issuers operating outside legal boundaries.

Operational Challenges for stablecoin Issuers

Stablecoins may appear backed by sufficient assets, but issuers could struggle to meet redemption requests during times of financial stress. ‍ Even with adequate liquid reserves,operational limitations can hinder their ability to process massive withdrawal demands. this vulnerability can lead to a decline in investor confidence and potential instability within the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.

For example, the collapse of TerraUSD (UST) in May 2022 demonstrated the risks​ associated with algorithmic stablecoins and the potential for rapid devaluation when faced with meaningful redemption pressure. The Federal Reserve’s May 2022 Financial Stability Report highlighted vulnerabilities in ⁤stablecoin⁤ arrangements.

potential for Premium ⁣Trading and Discounts

The market price of a stablecoin can deviate from its intended peg due to factors influencing ​investor confidence and perceived risk. Stablecoins offering high incentives may trade⁣ at a premium,while ‌those ⁣facing questions about their ‌collateralization could trade at a discount.

As of January 20, 2026, no widespread⁢ premium ‍or discount trading of major stablecoins has ‌been reported, but market conditions remain dynamic. CoinDesk’s analysis of stablecoin premiums and discounts provides⁢ ongoing market tracking.

regulatory Non-Compliance and ⁣False Guarantees

Some stablecoin issuers may deliberately disregard U.S. regulations by offering ‍misleading guarantees or unsustainable incentives to attract investors. This ‍practice is especially concerning in jurisdictions with existing challenges in combating financial crimes like tax evasion.

The U.S. Treasury Department has actively​ addressed⁣ these concerns. In October 2023, the Treasury released a framework for international cooperation on digital asset regulation, emphasizing the need for consistent standards and⁤ enforcement. Furthermore, the President’s ⁣Working Group on Financial​ Markets (PWG) released​ a report in ⁣2021 recommending that Congress pass legislation to regulate ​stablecoin issuers like ​banks.

Related Entities

  • U.S. Treasury Department: Oversees financial regulations and international cooperation regarding digital assets.
  • Federal Reserve: Monitors financial stability and assesses risks associated with stablecoins.
  • President’s Working Group on Financial Markets (PWG): provides recommendations on financial market regulation.
  • TerraUSD⁤ (UST): An algorithmic stablecoin ​whose collapse highlighted systemic risks.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.