Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Turkish human rights group finds jail at fault for not providing non-smoking ward

Turkish human rights group finds jail at fault for not providing non-smoking ward

August 24, 2024 Catherine Williams - Chief Editor News

An English wall

Jail overcrowding has put non-smoking prisoners at an obstacle. MT, a prisoner at Ağrı Patnos Kind L Closed Jail in japanese Turkey, had his 2019 request to be moved to a non-smoking ward accredited.

Nonetheless, because the jail inhabitants elevated, people who smoke have been additionally positioned within the non-smoking ward. MT stated that 15 of the 22 folks in his ward smoke and filed a brand new petition with the jail administration however there was no response.

MT then appealed to the Human Rights and Equality Institute of Turkey (TİHEK).

TİHEK initiated an investigation and requested a written assertion from the jail. The jail administration defined that the power was designed with a two-tier room system and that the variety of prisoners had elevated within the final three months. It was famous that two non-smoking wards had been allotted for these convicted of widespread offences, however the establishment didn’t have the capability to open new non-smoking wards. The administration stated that MT’s request can be fulfilled if circumstances permitted sooner or later.

MT added that regardless of a window within the room, the ward was stuffed with cigarette smoke, inflicting discomfort, particularly because the air vent was open between 6 am and 6 pm

TİHEK dominated that refusing MT’s request to remain in a non-smoking ward amounted to a violation of the prohibition on abuse. The choice emphasised that based on the Structure, the state should shield the bodily and psychological well-being of a person from all types of hazard, threats and violence.

The ruling stated, “Being in a penal establishment doesn’t require the forfeiture of 1’s bodily and psychological well being. Like different people, prisoners have the proper to guard their bodily and psychological well-being. Whereas penal establishments have broad discretion to implement measures to make sure security and self-discipline, these measures mustn’t trigger undue misery or pressure prisoners to stay in unsanitary circumstances past what is critical for his or her detention.”

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Copyright Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service