Ubriachi di gas, Promotrici del gruppo Facebook contro il caro bollette condannate
- Rimini, March 20, 2025 – The first instance trial has concluded for the two promoters of the Facebook group "Ubriachi di Gas" (Gas Drunk), a group that originated...
- Mirella Guzzo and Marisa Grossi, the administrator and moderator of the group respectively, were sentenced by the single judge to three months in prison.
- The court also ordered the defendants to pay damages, to be settled separately.
“Ubriachi di Gas” Facebook Group Administrators convicted in Rimini Trial
Table of Contents
- “Ubriachi di Gas” Facebook Group Administrators convicted in Rimini Trial
- “Ubriachi di Gas” Facebook Group Administrators Convicted: A Q&A
- introduction
- Key Questions and Answers
- What was the “Ubriachi di Gas” Facebook group, and why was it created?
- Who were the administrators of the “Ubriachi di Gas” group, and what charges were they convicted of?
- What was the sentence imposed on the administrators?
- What was Sgr’s reaction to the verdict?
- How did the administrators of the Facebook group respond to the verdict?
- What was the legal basis for the charges related to “disrupting the freedom of industry or commerce?”
- timeline of Events
- Key Takeaways
Published: March 20, 2025
Rimini, March 20, 2025 – The first instance trial has concluded for the two promoters of the Facebook group “Ubriachi di Gas” (Gas Drunk), a group that originated in 2018 amid user discontent with Sgr due to increased utility bills.
Mirella Guzzo and Marisa Grossi, the administrator and moderator of the group respectively, were sentenced by the single judge to three months in prison. They were found guilty of aggravated defamation and disrupting the freedom of industry or commerce.
The court also ordered the defendants to pay damages, to be settled separately. However, a provisional payment of 75,000 euros was awarded to the civil parties (the sgr group companies and the two administrators, Bruno Tani and Micaela Dionigi). The conditional suspension of the sentence is contingent upon fulfilling these civil obligations.
The Genesis of “Ubriachi di Gas”
The case began in early 2018, when gas bills arrived at the homes of families in Rimini. these bills, often inflated, sparked widespread outrage and led to the creation of the Facebook group “Ubriachi di Gas.” The initial aim was to share protests and reports regarding the bills, as well as to find practical solutions to cope with gas costs.
However, some users crossed the line into insults, leading to the initial complaint. This first complaint was followed by another, alleging the crime of disrupting the freedom of industry and commerce.
“There is there’s no doubt whatsoever that the company suffered serious and wholly unjustified attacks on its reputation,”
Moreno Maresi, attorney for the civil party
Maresi further noted that “as early as 2019, the investigating judge issued a preventive seizure order for the Facebook group.”
Sgr’s Perspective on the Facebook Group Case
The administrators of Sgr commented on the conclusion of the trial:
“This concludes a matter that involved a company that has made clarity and willingness to engage in dialog with customers its strength. The action taken against the group far exceeded the limits of even critical debate. The attacks received via social media had crossed all boundaries.We have never doubted that these were gratuitous and unfounded offenses.”
Administrators of Sgr
Defense Responds to the Verdict
Marisa Grossi expressed her reaction on Facebook:
“A sentence that left us stunned and dismayed: we were convicted of both crimes, aggravated defamation and disturbing the freedom of industry and commerce. The latter crime is committed with actions that fall into the category of fraud and violence. A very heavy sentence despite the numerous pieces of evidence in our defense and despite the lack of evidence from the opposing party. The judge who issued this sentence added an economic punishment that, as someone who still considers herself completely innocent, I find unacceptable. We await the filing of the sentence and the related justifications. These will undoubtedly be followed by the necessary legal steps to continue our legal journey.”
Marisa grossi
“Ubriachi di Gas” Facebook Group Administrators Convicted: A Q&A
introduction
This article delves into the legal case surrounding the “Ubriachi di Gas” (Gas Drunk) Facebook group, focusing on the conviction of its administrators in Rimini, Italy. The group was born out of consumer discontent with increased utility bills. This comprehensive Q&A will address key aspects of the case, the charges, the sentences, and the reactions from the involved parties.
Key Questions and Answers
What was the “Ubriachi di Gas” Facebook group, and why was it created?
The “Ubriachi di Gas” Facebook group was created in early 2018 in Rimini, Italy, in response too user dissatisfaction with increased gas utility bills issued by Sgr. The primary objective of the group was to:
Share protests and reports related to the inflated gas bills.
Find practical solutions to manage and reduce the costs associated with gas consumption.
Who were the administrators of the “Ubriachi di Gas” group, and what charges were they convicted of?
Mirella Guzzo, the administrator, and Marisa Grossi, the moderator of the Facebook group ”Ubriachi di Gas,” were convicted of:
Aggravated defamation
Disrupting the freedom of industry or commerce
What was the sentence imposed on the administrators?
The administrators were sentenced to three months in prison. The court also ordered them to pay damages, which would be determined later. In addition, a provisional payment of 75,000 euros was awarded to the civil parties (the Sgr group companies and the two administrators, Bruno Tani and Micaela Dionigi). The conditional suspension of the sentence depends on the fulfillment of thes civil obligations.
What was Sgr’s reaction to the verdict?
Sgr, the utility company, issued a statement regarding the trial’s conclusion:
The company stated that the Facebook group’s actions had far exceeded the boundaries of critical debate.
They emphasized that the attacks received via social media were unjustified.
they reaffirmed their focus on transparency and dialogue with their customers.
How did the administrators of the Facebook group respond to the verdict?
Marisa Grossi, the moderator, expressed her dismay on Facebook:
She described the sentence as “heavy” despite evidence presented in their defense.
She found the economic punishment unacceptable, maintaining her innocence.
She confirmed that the defendants would continue their legal journey, awaiting the filing of the sentence.
The charge of “disrupting the freedom of industry or commerce” likely stemmed from the allegation that the administrators’ actions, especially the content shared on the Facebook group, interfered with Sgr’s business operations or reputation. Actions that might constitute interference include:
statements that incite boycott or discredit the company.
Actions designed to deter customers from using Sgr services.
Organized campaigns aiming to damage the company’s financial stability.
timeline of Events
| Date | Event |
| ———– | ————————————————————————————————– |
| Early 2018 | “Ubriachi di Gas” Facebook group created due to inflated gas bills.|
| 2019 | Investigating judge issues a preventive seizure order for the Facebook group. |
| March 20, 2025 | The first-instance trial concludes, and the administrators are convicted. |
Key Takeaways
The “Ubriachi di Gas” case highlights the legal consequences of online actions, particularly when they involve defamation and attempts to disrupt business or commerce.
Social media platforms can be powerful tools for consumer activism, but users must remain aware of potential legal risks.
Companies are increasingly vigilant about protecting their reputations.