Ukraine Discovers Russian Oreshnik ICBM Fragments After Dnipro Strike
On November 21, 2024, a Russian missile struck the city of Dnipro. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) found and displayed fragments of a newly developed Russian missile called the Oreshnik. The SBU shared details about the missile with journalists from the Associated Press.
The Oreshnik missile is based on the RS-26 Rubezh intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). It can carry both conventional and nuclear warheads. The missile was launched from the Kapustin Yar test site in Russia and reached speeds of 11 Mach during flight. It traveled for 15 minutes and carried six warheads, each loading six submunitions.
The debris collected by SBU included damaged wires and a casing similar in size to a large winter tire. This marks the first time such missile debris has been discovered in Ukraine. Authorities are investigating the incident to gather more information about the attack.
What are the technical capabilities of the Oreshnik missile and its impact on missile defense systems?
Interview with Dr. Alexei Petrov, Missile Defense Specialist
Date: November 22, 2024
Interviewer: Julia Kravets, News Editor at newsdirectory3.com
Kravets: Thank you for joining us, Dr. Petrov. We’d like to discuss the recent missile strike in Dnipro and particularly the newly identified Oreshnik missile. What can you tell us about its significance?
Dr. Petrov: Thank you for having me. The discovery of the Oreshnik missile is quite concerning, as it represents an evolution in Russian missile technology. The fact that it is based on the RS-26 Rubezh intercontinental ballistic missile indicates a continued focus on enhancing their strategic capabilities. This missile can deliver both conventional and nuclear payloads, which showcases Russia’s growing proficiency in precision strikes.
Kravets: The missile reportedly reached speeds of 11 Mach and had a substantial range. How does this affect the strategic landscape in the region?
Dr. Petrov: The speed and range of the Oreshnik missile—up to 6,000 km—significantly expand Russia’s strike options. It can target a wide area while potentially evading early warning systems. By launching it from the Kapustin Yar test site, near the Volga River, Russia can strike deep into Ukrainian territory while being relatively safe from immediate counterattack. This capability raises the stakes not just for Ukraine but for NATO and other European nations as well.
Kravets: The implications of such technology are indeed unsettling. Can you elaborate on the specifics of the version launched on November 21?
Dr. Petrov: It’s critical to note that the missile launched on November 21 was likely equipped with a non-nuclear payload. This is often a demonstration of capabilities to assert power without escalating to full-scale nuclear warfare—something that may serve both domestic propaganda and international posturing. The Oreshnik’s ability to carry multiple warheads, each with submunitions, implies a devastating tactical capability, particularly in urban environments.
Kravets: The Security Service of Ukraine has collected debris from the strike. What does this indicate about the missile technology being used?
Dr. Petrov: The debris analysis is crucial. The store of damaged wires and the missile casing, akin to a large winter tire, suggest a sophisticated design that not only enhances performance but also indicates advancements in materials used for missile construction. Debris analysis can provide insights into guidance systems and whether missile defenses in place were effective. Importantly, this incident represents the first find of such debris in Ukraine, marking a new phase in the ongoing conflict.
Kravets: How might Ukraine respond to the continued threats posed by missiles like the Oreshnik?
Dr. Petrov: Ukraine’s responses may include bolstering their air defense systems and seeking advanced technology from allies. They might also increase their surveillance efforts to better track missile launches. Politically, this development could persuade NATO member states to enhance their commitment to Ukraine, stressing the need for a collaborative defense strategy that deters potential aggressors.
Kravets: what long-term implications could this have for regional security?
Dr. Petrov: The emergence of the Oreshnik missile underscores the necessity for regional and global powers to take missile defense seriously. If countries continue to augment their arsenals with advanced missile systems, it could lead to an arms race. Nations need to engage in dialog about arms control measures to prevent further escalation and ensure a more stable security environment in the region.
Kravets: Thank you for your insights, Dr. Petrov. Your expertise is invaluable as we navigate these complex issues.
Dr. Petrov: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial that we remain informed as these developments unfold.
On November 21, Russia launched the missile, likely with a non-nuclear payload to showcase its capabilities. The missile has a range of about 6,000 km and was fired from the Astrakhan region in Russia. The ongoing investigation aims to clarify the details of the attack and its implications.