USAID Cuts: Global Health & Poverty Crisis
USAID cuts threaten to deprive millions of vital healthcare, potentially causing over 3 million preventable deaths annually. This global health crisis, fueled by slashed funding, is crippling programs across the globe, impacting vulnerable populations and essential services. read the latest coverage, showcasing the devastating effects in Haiti, Afghanistan, Yemen, and the Thai-Burma border, where countless lives hang in the balance. Jan Egeland and Amanda Klasing, among other experts, warn of the detrimental impact on humanitarian aid. News directory 3 sheds light on thes critical developments, highlighting the historical role of the U.S. in international aid. Discover what’s next …
USAID Cuts: Millions at Risk, Aid Groups Decry Impact on Global Health

Sweeping cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) could deny up to 95 million people access to basic healthcare, perhaps leading to over 3 million preventable deaths each year, according to multiple reports. Researchers at Boston University estimate that previous cuts by the Trump management have already resulted in approximately 300,000 deaths.
Earlier this year, Elon Musk called for USAID to be shut down.
Amanda Klasing,with Amnesty International USA,said the cuts are already having devastating effects. Amnesty International recently released a report titled “Lives at Risk: Chaotic and Abrupt Cuts to Foreign aid Put Millions of lives at Risk.”
Klasing highlighted several case studies, including programs in Haiti where services for child victims of sexual violence and HIV prevention for LGBT individuals and sex workers have been severely impacted. In Afghanistan, services for internally displaced people have been cut, disproportionately affecting women. Yemen,already facing a major humanitarian crisis,has seen cuts to services for girls and survivors of sexual violence.
Klasing also cited an instance on the Thai-Burma border where patients were forced to leave hospitals mid-treatment due to funding cessation.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has stated that no lives have been lost due to USAID cuts, a claim Klasing disputes. She pointed to a program in Guatemala providing nutrition to pregnant girls, which was cut, impacting their lives.
Jan Egeland, with the Norwegian Refugee Council, echoed these concerns. His institution operates in 40 countries affected by war and disasters and relies on USAID‘s Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance. Egeland noted the abrupt departure of U.S. aid is creating critically important gaps in lifesaving assistance.
Egeland recounted his recent trip to northern Mozambique, where hundreds of thousands are displaced due to violence from the islamic State and climate-related disasters. He said the U.S. had been providing 60% of the humanitarian aid in the region. Now, water towers, paid for by American taxpayers, stand empty, and overflowing latrines threaten to spread disease.
Egeland emphasized the historical role of the U.S. in providing humanitarian aid and urged a return to those ideals.
Klasing added that U.S. funding has supported programs addressing gender-based violence, promoting gender equality, increasing girls’ education, and supporting women leaders, all of which contribute to improved maternal health outcomes.
