Valparaíso, San Antonio Carriers Abandon EPSA – G5Noticias Asat Parking Lot
Valparaíso Truckers Bypass Port Parking Lot Over Safety Concerns
Table of Contents
- Valparaíso Truckers Bypass Port Parking Lot Over Safety Concerns
- Valparaíso Truckers Bypass Port Parking lot Over Safety Concerns: A Q&A
- Why are Truckers in Valparaíso Bypassing the Mandatory Port Parking Lot?
- What are the Specific Concerns of the Trucking Guilds?
- Which Trucking Guilds are Involved in this Action?
- What percentage of trucks Does This Action Affect?
- Which Terminals are Truckers proceeding to?
- What is the Name of the Parking Lot Being Bypassed?
- what is the Distance of the ASAT Parking Lot from the Port?
- What is the Stance of the Union Leaders?
- What are the increased Costs Associated with Using the ASAT Parking Lot?
- Are Port Operations Being Affected by the Truckers’ Actions?
- Summary of Key Issues
VALPARAÍSO, Chile (AP) — Trucking guilds in the Valparaíso region began bypassing a mandatory port parking lot on April 1, citing safety concerns and increased costs for drivers. The guilds, representing a significant portion of the region’s trucking operations, allege the parking lot fails to meet minimum safety standards and reduces competitiveness.
Union Action
The Federation of Truck Owners of the Fifth Region (Fedequinta), the Association of truck Owners of San Antonio (AGEC), and the Transportist Guild Group of San Antonio informed their members late yesterday of the action. As of midnight April 1, trucks are proceeding directly to the STI and DPWORLD terminals to drop off and collect cargo, avoiding the ASAT parking lot located 6 miles upstream from the port.
According to the unions, this measure, affecting an estimated 70% of trucks operating in the Valparaíso region, will remain in effect until further notice.
Safety Concerns
“We had to take this pressure measure,” said Iván Mateluna, president of Fedequinta. “as a guild,we cannot allow our drivers to be in a place that does not meet the minimum safety conditions,which translates into uncertainty during each stay in the parking lot. We proposed this to EPSA, and unluckily, our requests were not taken into consideration.”
Increased costs and Delays
AGEC carriers also voiced concerns about increased fuel costs associated with using the ASAT parking lot,estimating an additional 12 miles per round trip. The manager of AGEC stated that ASAT leads to additional waiting times, negatively impacting drivers’ quality of life and reducing their ability to secure additional transport jobs. The added cost is ultimately borne by the truck owners.
Port Operations unaffected
Despite the truckers’ actions, Fredes, a representative from one of the trucking groups, indicated that port terminals were operating smoothly. “Throughout the morning, the port terminals were receiving charging vehicles without problems, so we will continue without using the ASAT,” Fredes said.
Valparaíso Truckers Bypass Port Parking lot Over Safety Concerns: A Q&A
Welcome! This article provides insights into the recent actions of trucking guilds in Valparaíso, Chile. Let’s dive in!
Why are Truckers in Valparaíso Bypassing the Mandatory Port Parking Lot?
Trucking guilds in the Valparaíso region initiated bypassing the mandatory port parking lot on April 1st, 2025.This decision stems from safety concerns and increased costs for drivers.
What are the Specific Concerns of the Trucking Guilds?
The primary concerns can be broken down into:
safety: The guilds allege the ASAT parking lot, located 6 miles upstream from the port, fails to meet minimum safety standards. This translates to uncertainty for drivers.
Increased Costs: Drivers face increased fuel costs due to the additional 12 miles per round trip required to use the ASAT parking lot.Increased waiting times is also a factor, impacting drivers’ quality of life and their ability to secure more jobs.
Which Trucking Guilds are Involved in this Action?
Several key organizations are involved:
The Federation of Truck Owners of the Fifth Region (Fedequinta)
The Association of Truck Owners of San Antonio (AGEC)
* The Transportist Guild Group of San Antonio
These guilds represent a significant portion of the region’s trucking operations.
What percentage of trucks Does This Action Affect?
This measure, as per the article, impacts an estimated 70% of the trucks operating within the Valparaíso region.
Which Terminals are Truckers proceeding to?
Trucks are proceeding directly to the STI and DPWORLD terminals to drop off and collect cargo.
What is the Name of the Parking Lot Being Bypassed?
The parking lot being bypassed is the ASAT parking lot.
what is the Distance of the ASAT Parking Lot from the Port?
The ASAT parking lot is located 6 miles upstream from the port.
What is the Stance of the Union Leaders?
Iván Mateluna, president of Fedequinta, stated that the guild had to take this “pressure measure” due to the unacceptable safety conditions at the parking lot. The unions’ requests to EPSA were not considered.
What are the increased Costs Associated with Using the ASAT Parking Lot?
AGEC carriers are facing increased fuel costs due to the additional 12-mile round trip. There are also added waiting times at the ASAT parking lot.
Are Port Operations Being Affected by the Truckers’ Actions?
No, the port terminals continue to operate smoothly. Fredes, a representative from one of the trucking groups, indicated that terminals were receiving charging vehicles without problems, despite the bypass.
Summary of Key Issues
Here’s a concise summary:
| Issue | Details |
| ———————— | ——————————————————————————————————————————————– |
| Bypassing Action | Started April 1, 2025; Trucks avoiding ASAT parking lot. |
| Primary Reasons | Safety concerns; Increased costs. |
| Safety Concerns | ASAT parking lot does not meet minimum safety standards leading to uncertainty for drivers. |
| Cost Increases | extra 12 miles per round trip, plus waiting times impacting fuel costs, driver quality of life, and the possibility of more transport jobs. |
| Port Operation Impact | Terminals operating smoothly. |
| Percentage of Trucks Affected | 70% |