Home » News » Wali Kota Medan Copot Lurah Ibnu Ridelsa

Wali Kota Medan Copot Lurah Ibnu Ridelsa

Medan⁣ Mayor ⁢Takes Swift Action on‍ Public Service

Medan, 2025-03-20 – Mayor ‍Rico Waas is moving‍ swiftly to ensure excellent public‍ service in​ Medan. His latest actions demonstrate a commitment to holding public officials accountable.

Surprise ​Inspection Reveals Inefficiency

Mayor Rico Tri Putra Bayu Waas conducted a⁢ surprise inspection (sidak) of sub-district and​ village⁢ offices on Thursday, March 20, 2025. The focus of these inspections is to⁢ improve public service delivery and address citizen concerns promptly.

The mayor’s ‍inspection included an unannounced⁣ visit ‍to the Tegal Sari Mandala III Village Office in Medan Denai.

Lurah Absent⁢ During Inspection

Upon arriving at approximately ⁣10:00 AM, Rico⁢ Waas discovered that the ‌office door of Lurah Ibnu Ridelsa was locked. This ⁤promptly raised concerns about the Lurah’s commitment to his duties.

The mayor inquired about the Lurah’s whereabouts, questioning⁢ the head of the government section, employees, ‌and village staff. The responses⁣ indicated a concerning pattern.

Data gathered ⁤during the inspection‍ revealed ⁣that Lurah Ibnu ‌Ridelsa consistently arrived at the office after 12:00 PM. This corroborated ​previous reports from the community ⁣received by the ‍mayor.

Immediate Action Taken

After ⁤gathering information from the village staff, Rico⁣ Waas instructed ‌his aide to contact the Head of BKPSDM ​(Personnel Board), Subhan Fajri. ⁢The mayor’s instructions were clear and decisive.

Diminta agar Ibnu Ridelsa diperiksa terlebih dahulu oleh Inspektorat soal ⁢kinerjanya dan‌ memproses pemberhentiannya sebagai Lurah.

This ⁢translates to:​ “Ibnu Ridelsa is⁢ to be immediately ‌investigated by the ⁣Inspectorate​ regarding his performance, and the process for his dismissal as Lurah should be initiated.”

Allegations of Illegal Levies

The mayor also uncovered allegations of unacceptable practices, specifically illegal ⁢levies ‍carried out by⁤ village officials. These actions ⁤undermine public trust ⁤and ‌hinder​ effective public service.

Reportedly, a middle-aged woman routinely assisted residents ‌with⁤ administrative matters related to population registration at Disdukcapil⁣ (Population ‍and Civil Registry Office), but only in exchange for payment.

Several village staff members⁣ acknowledged this practice and⁤ stated ⁣that they⁤ had frequently​ warned the individual against engaging in such inappropriate‌ behavior. The mayor’s office is taking these allegations ⁣seriously.

Mayor Vows ⁢Strict Sanctions

Regarding these findings,Mayor⁤ Rico Waas affirmed that he would immediately impose strict sanctions,including dismissal,on the Lurah.The mayor emphasized the importance of public servants‍ being present and available to serve the community.

Mau apalagi‍ dia, ​mau melayani masyarakat tapi⁤ dianya tidak hadir (di kantor),

He told reporters, “What else​ can be done?⁤ He wants ⁣to serve the community, but he is​ not even present⁤ in the office.” This⁣ statement ‍underscores the mayor’s zero-tolerance policy for absenteeism and dereliction of duty.

Key Takeaways:

  • Mayor Rico Waas is prioritizing public service excellence.
  • Surprise⁣ inspections ⁢are being used to monitor and improve performance.
  • Strict action will be taken against officials who fail to meet expectations.

medan ⁢Mayor’s Commitment to Public Service: A Q&A

Mayor Rico Waas of ⁢Medan is taking decisive‌ steps to ensure efficient and accountable public service.⁤ This article explores his ⁤recent actions and the implications for⁣ the community.

Why is Mayor Rico Waas‍ focusing on public service improvement?

Mayor Rico Waas is prioritizing public service excellence to meet the‌ needs and ​expectations of the community. His actions,‌ including surprise inspections​ and strict sanctions, demonstrate his commitment to holding public officials accountable and ensuring services are delivered effectively. ‍This focus⁢ aims to enhance citizen satisfaction, build public trust, and foster a more efficient local government.

What led to the inspection of ⁣the Tegal Sari mandala III Village Office?

The inspection was ‌prompted by⁤ citizen concerns and reports of inefficiencies⁣ in ​public service delivery. Mayor Waas conducted surprise inspections ⁣to monitor ​the performance of public officials and address any issues ‌promptly. The ​inspection of the tegal Sari Mandala III Village Office was part of this initiative.

What were⁣ the key⁤ findings⁢ from the inspection?

The inspection revealed notable issues, including:

Lurah’s Absenteeism: Lurah ibnu Ridelsa was consistently late, arriving at the ⁢office after 12:00 PM, despite community reports.

Allegations of Illegal levies: There were reports of village officials accepting payments‌ from residents for administrative assistance,​ undermining public trust and hindering service effectiveness.

What actions did‍ Mayor Waas take based on the findings?

Mayor ‍Waas took immediate and decisive action:

Lurah’s Dismissal Process: He instructed his aide to contact the Head of the Personnel Board (BKPSDM) to initiate an‌ investigation by the Inspectorate into Lurah Ibnu Ridelsa’s performance and begin the process for his dismissal.

Investigation of ⁢Illegal Levies: The mayor’s office is taking the allegations of illegal levies seriously and will likely conduct a thorough investigation.

Strict Sanctions: The mayor vowed to impose strict sanctions, including ‍dismissal, on the Lurah.

What is the significance of the Mayor’s ⁤actions?

the Mayor’s swift actions underscore his⁢ zero-tolerance policy for absenteeism, dereliction of duty, and corruption. His actions signal a commitment to:

accountability: Holding public officials​ responsible for their performance.

Efficiency: ⁤ Improving public service delivery and ‌addressing citizen‍ concerns⁢ promptly.

integrity: Combating unethical practices like illegal levies.

* ⁣ Public Trust: Building and maintaining the‌ community’s‍ confidence in local government.

How do these actions ‍relate to ⁣overall public ⁢service efficiency?

These ⁣actions directly relate ‍to overall public service⁤ efficiency by addressing issues that hinder effective‍ service delivery. ‍Absenteeism and corruption reduce the ability of public servants to serve the ‍community,leading to ⁣inefficiencies. Inspections and strict sanctions help improve public service delivery (Source: [1], [2], [3]).

Here’s a summary table⁣ highlighting the key issues and actions.

| Issue ⁢ ​ ‌ | Action Taken ‌ ‌ ‍ ⁢ ‌ ⁣ ⁣ ​ ⁢ ‌ ⁤ ⁢ ‌ ​ ‍ ‍ ⁣ ⁣⁢ ​ ⁢ ‌ ‍ ​ ‌ ​ |

| :———————————- |‍ :———————————————————————————————————————————————————————– |

| ⁣Lurah’s⁤ Absenteeism ⁤ | directed investigation and initiated dismissal process. ⁣ ⁤ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣​ ⁣ ​ ​ ⁢ ⁣ ⁢ ⁢ ‍‍ ‌ ⁤ ⁣ ‌ ⁣ |

| Allegations of Illegal Levies ​ | Serious​ consideration and⁤ potential investigation. ​ ​ ​ ‌ ⁤ ⁤ ​ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ ‌ ‌ ‌ |

| Overall Public service Inefficiency ‌|⁣ Surprise inspections to identify and address areas for improvement; ⁤vowed strict sanctions⁣ to ⁤ensure accountability and better public service. |

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.