Council’s New Parking Machines spark Controversy: Cllr Quinlan Questions Legality and Fairness
Table of Contents
Waterford City Council’s introduction of advanced pay-and-display parking machines, which now require drivers to input their vehicle registration numbers, has drawn sharp criticism from Councillor John Quinlan. He alleges the move is a “sneaky way” to prevent the common practice of transferring unused parking time to other drivers, raising concerns about the council’s legal standing and the system’s potential for unfair fines.
“NASA-Like” Machines and the end of Ticket Sharing
Councillor Quinlan voiced his constituents’ bewilderment at the new machines, with one describing them as resembling “something from NASA, with all the buttons and information required.” The core of his objection lies in the linking of parking tickets to specific vehicle registration numbers.
“Locking tickets to a single vehicle might seem harmless, but it’s a sneaky way to stop people sharing leftover time,” Cllr Quinlan stated. “If someone pays for an hour and only uses 40 minutes, why shouldn’t they give the remaining 20 minutes to someone else?” He argued that this practice was previously common and accepted, and its prevention represents a shift towards a more restrictive and possibly unfair parking policy.
Legal Doubts and Unclear Responses
Adding to the controversy, Cllr quinlan expressed his lack of awareness regarding any recent amendments to the Council’s parking by-laws that would permit these changes. This has led him to suggest that the Council might be operating on “legally shaky ground.”
In response to these concerns, Council officials stated they were confident that current by-laws support linking parking tickets to registration numbers. though, their answer regarding fines for drivers who use the parking app but do not display a physical ticket was less definitive.
“I have to say we didn’t get a clear response on this, which is quite telling,” Cllr Quinlan remarked. ”I’m not pleasant that the Council has the legal authority to restrict how people use their purchased time. If it’s challenged, I’m not sure the Council would win.”
System Glitches and Frustration for Users
Beyond the legal and policy questions, Cllr Quinlan also highlighted potential technical vulnerabilities within the new system. He raised concerns about the system’s ability to accurately verify paid parking, particularly if technical issues cause delays in updates from the parking app.
“Any fines issued in cases where the app didn’t sync properly should be struck out,” he insisted.”It’s the height of summer, and this is frustrating for both locals and visitors. Older people,in particular,are finding the new machines confusing. The Council’s attempt to squeeze extra revenue in such a complex way is frustrating and unfair.”
The Councillor’s strong stance underscores a growing sentiment among some residents and visitors that the new parking system, while perhaps technologically advanced, is creating unnecessary complications and potential financial penalties for users. The Council’s clarity on the legal basis for these changes and the robustness of its app-based system will be crucial in addressing these widespread concerns.
