Why Cracker Is Still One of One Piece’s Most Underrated Villains
- Analysis regarding the combat capabilities and narrative role of Charlotte Cracker, a major antagonist in the Japanese franchise One Piece, continues to generate debate within fan communities.
- Charlotte Cracker holds a high-ranking position within the Big Mom Pirates, serving as one of the Three Sweet Commanders.
- In his administrative capacity, Cracker serves as Totto Land's Minister of Biscuit.
Analysis regarding the combat capabilities and narrative role of Charlotte Cracker, a major antagonist in the Japanese franchise One Piece, continues to generate debate within fan communities. Central to these discussions is the thesis that the character is highly underrated
in terms of his actual strength and the circumstances surrounding his defeat.
Role and Position within the Big Mom Pirates
Charlotte Cracker holds a high-ranking position within the Big Mom Pirates, serving as one of the Three Sweet Commanders. He is the tenth son and fifteenth child of the Charlotte Family and is the older triplet brother of Angel, and Custard.
In his administrative capacity, Cracker serves as Totto Land’s Minister of Biscuit. In this role, he is responsible for governing Biscuits Island. In the Japanese version of the series, the character is voiced by Takuya Kirimoto.
Combat Analysis and the Biscuit Soldiers
The debate over Cracker’s power levels often focuses on the effectiveness of his Biscuit Soldiers. Some analysts argue that the strength of these constructs has been overlooked, claiming that a single biscuit soldier was stronger than Luffy when utilizing Gear Third at that specific point in the story.

Further comparisons suggest that an individual soldier possesses greater strength than characters such as Caesar.
Cracker’s combat effectiveness is attributed to his Devil Fruit, which is described as one of the best defensive fruits in the series. His primary strategy for victory against powerful opponents involves a process of wearing them down over time.
Analysis of Defeat and Power Scaling
A significant point of discussion involves the specific factors that led to Cracker’s loss. One perspective asserts that Cracker did not lose to Luffy in a solo encounter, but rather to a combination of Luffy, Nami, and the influence of the forest.
This analysis suggests that certain combat forms, specifically Snakeman, likely would have been unable to break through the Biscuit Soldiers at the time of the encounter.
The evolution of Luffy’s strength is also cited as a key context for these comparisons. It is noted that Luffy subsequently increased his physical strength in Wano and improved his coating of Armament Haki during his confrontation with Katakuri, factors that were not present during the initial fight with Cracker.
