Working-Class Creatives Face UK Inequality
- Artists, directors, and actors have raised concerns about what they describe as a rigged system that prevents working-class talent from thriving in the arts and entertainment industries.
- Steven Knight, the creator of Peaky Blinders, director Shane Meadows, and Turner Prize winner Jesse Darling are among those who have spoken out about this crisis.
- Almost a third (30%) of artistic directors and other creative leaders were educated privately, compared with a national average of 7%.
Elitism in the Arts: A Barrier to Working-Class Talent
Table of Contents
- Elitism in the Arts: A Barrier to Working-Class Talent
- Elitism in the Arts: A Barrier to Working-Class talent
- Frequently Asked Questions
- 1. What are the key barriers to working-class talent in the arts and entertainment industries?
- 2. How is elitism manifested within the arts sector?
- 3.What are the impacts of declining arts education in state schools?
- 4. How can the arts become more inclusive and accessible?
- 5. Why is diversity important in the arts industry?
- Authoritative Sources and Further Reading
- Frequently Asked Questions
Artists, directors, and actors have raised concerns about what they describe as a rigged system that prevents working-class talent from thriving in the arts and entertainment industries. This issue has been highlighted by an analysis showing that nearly a third of major arts leaders were educated privately, a stark contrast to the national average.
Steven Knight, the creator of Peaky Blinders, director Shane Meadows, and Turner Prize winner Jesse Darling are among those who have spoken out about this crisis. Their concerns were sparked by a Guardian survey of the 50 organizations that receive the most Arts Council England funding, which revealed a disproportionate number of leadership roles held by individuals educated privately and those who attended the universities of Oxford or Cambridge.
Almost a third (30%) of artistic directors and other creative leaders were educated privately, compared with a national average of 7%. More than a third (36%) of the organizations’ chief executives or other executive directors went to private schools. The analysis also found that 17.5% of artistic directors and more than a quarter (26%) of chief executives went to Oxford or Cambridge, compared with less than 1% of the general population.
Andy Haldane, the chief executive of the Royal Society of Arts, expressed shock at the findings but acknowledged that they were not entirely surprising. Haldane, a former chief economist at the Bank of England, stated, “As one of the most dynamic sectors of the economy, the creative industries will need to do a much better job of nurturing socioeconomic mobility to realize their potential.”
Research by the Sutton Trust has highlighted a stark overrepresentation in the arts for those from the most affluent backgrounds, defined as “upper middle-class backgrounds.” The report found that 43% of Britain’s best-selling classical musicians and 35% of BAFTA-nominated actors were alumni of private schools. Among classical musicians, 58% had attended university, as well as 64% of top actors.
In contrast, the number of UK students taking arts subjects has plummeted in recent years, leading to what the Guardian dubbed a “creativity crisis” in state schools. Since 2010, enrollment in arts GCSEs has fallen by 40%, and the number of arts teachers has declined by 23%.
Research last year found that about half of all A-level students took at least one humanities subject a decade ago. But by 2021-22, that had fallen to 38%, with the proportion taking arts subjects such as music, design, and media studies dropping to 24%.
Figures from across arts and culture told the Guardian that perceptions of the sector as inaccessible to working-class people and the rising cost of being an artist were discouraging a generation from trying to establish themselves in creative industries. Knight said, “I think the real problem is that working-class people look at the arts and think this isn’t something that people like me do. There is a perception across the board that there is something about the arts that is unattainable.”
Meadows, the director of This Is England, noted that the kind of schemes and courses to which he had access as a young artist were now too rare. “The projects that existed and were open to me have vanished from so many places,” he said.
Michael Socha, who starred recently in the Meadows drama The Gallows Pole and got his start in acting via the Television Workshop in Nottingham, said the middle-class environment of film and TV in the UK could be difficult to navigate. “There’s a lot of impostor syndrome sometimes,” he said. “When I get a job, like a big job, I often get quite intimidated by how elitist it is.”
Happy Valley’s showrunner, Sally Wainwright, recalled, “When I was a kid, I remember my dad saying to me: ‘People like us don’t become writers.’ He was a headteacher and a senior lecturer at a polytechnic, but he still thought that people like us didn’t make money out of writing.”
Recent research by Netflix found that nine in 10 working-class parents would discourage their children from pursuing a career in film and television because they did not see it as a viable career.
The artist Larry Achiampong said access to higher education in the arts was too expensive and an “impossibility” for many. “When you look at the rates that people must pay to get on degree-level courses and above, it’s no wonder that many drop off during said courses or even afterwards should they graduate. The game is rigged.”
Darling, the 2023 Turner Prize winner, said the wider issue of access to the arts for working-class people was rooted in a lack of government support and the shrinking of the welfare state. “The problem with arts participation and diversity is that there is no welfare state anymore,” he said. “The Britpop acts and the Young British Artists didn’t pay for school, they lived on the dole and had housing benefits – that was their government patronage. Now there’s wage labor and the housing crisis, and the welfare state has become increasingly difficult to access. I was able to access the last gasps of that system, including working tax credits, while university loans hadn’t ballooned to the amounts we see now.”
The award-winning playwright Beth Steel said she was able to get a foothold in the world of theatre by securing a place as a live-in property guardian in London where her rent, including bills, was £135 a month. That allowed her to work on her breakthrough play, Wonderland, about the mining community in Nottinghamshire where she was raised.
“It is still very rare to have contemporary regional working-class voices on these big main stages, unless it’s nostalgic,” she said. “People need to see something of themselves to think there is a possibility that they can also do that.”
Steel added that schemes such as Theatre 503 that she was part of need to be better-funded to allow playwrights from working-class backgrounds to focus solely on writing.
Mark Simpson, the composer and clarinettist who won the BBC Young Musician of the Year in 2006, said the reduction in local and national government-supported schemes meant someone from his roots would struggle to break through in the classical world today. “The limitations now that kids from my background face are almost too high to get through,” he said.
Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, said, “Who tells the story determines the story that is told. So if you don’t have a diverse workforce in the arts world, then too many people’s stories will be erased from our national story. As a government, we’re absolutely determined that that is going to change.”
An Arts Council England spokesperson said, “We’re very aware that people seeking to forge careers in the arts can face a range of barriers, and that social class is one of them. Our own data shows clearly that the better off are better represented in the workforce.” But they said they were confident “progress could be made” and ACE has started to track social mobility within the organizations it funds.
In the United States, similar issues are evident. For instance, the lack of diversity in Hollywood has long been a topic of debate, with studies showing that people of color and those from lower-income backgrounds are underrepresented in both in front of and behind the camera. Initiatives like the #OscarsSoWhite movement have highlighted the need for greater inclusion.
In the realm of classical music, the lack of diversity is even more pronounced. A study by the League of American Orchestras found that only 5.3% of musicians in the top 50 orchestras were African American, and 2.8% were Hispanic. This disparity is not just a matter of representation but also of access to education and training opportunities.
One practical application of addressing this issue is the implementation of more scholarships and mentorship programs for underrepresented groups. Organizations like the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and the National Association for Campus Activities (NACA) offer scholarships and mentorships to help students from diverse backgrounds pursue careers in the arts.
Another approach is to create more inclusive environments within arts organizations. This can be achieved through diversity training, inclusive hiring practices, and creating a culture where everyone feels valued and heard. For example, the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts in New York has implemented diversity initiatives to ensure that their programming and staff reflect the diverse communities they serve.
Critics may argue that talent should be the sole criterion for success in the arts, and that efforts to increase diversity could lead to a lowering of standards. However, evidence from various studies shows that diverse teams are more innovative and creative, leading to better outcomes. A report by McKinsey & Company found that ethnically diverse companies are 35% more likely to outperform their peers financially.
In conclusion, the arts and entertainment industries face a significant challenge in ensuring that working-class talent is given the opportunity to thrive. While progress has been made, there is still a long way to go. By addressing the barriers to entry and creating more inclusive environments, the arts can become a more diverse and vibrant sector that reflects the richness and diversity of society.
Elitism in the Arts: A Barrier to Working-Class talent
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are the key barriers to working-class talent in the arts and entertainment industries?
The arts and entertainment sectors are ofen perceived as inaccessible to individuals from working-class backgrounds due to several barriers:
- Educational Background Disparity: A meaningful percentage of arts leadership roles are held by individuals who attended private schools and prestigious universities like Oxford or Cambridge. approximately 30% of artistic directors come from private education backgrounds, compared to the national average of 7%.
- Cost of Higher Education: The financial burden of pursuing arts education is ample, often deterring working-class individuals. Programs at esteemed institutions can be prohibitively expensive, leading many talented individuals to abandon their artistic pursuits before or after graduation.
- Cultural Perceptions: Working-class individuals frequently enough perceive the arts as a domain reserved for those from more affluent backgrounds. this perception is reinforced by societal narratives that discourage cultural engagement from those not traditionally associated with the arts.
2. How is elitism manifested within the arts sector?
Elitism in the arts is demonstrated through several factors:
- Representation in Leadership: Arts Council England funding recipients show that leaders are disproportionately drawn from private education backgrounds. Over one-third (36%) of chief executives or executive directors of funded organizations were privately educated.
- Access to Programs and Courses: Schemes and programs historically accessible to young, aspiring artists from various backgrounds are now scarce. The reduction in available art-focused curricula in state schools has exacerbated this issue.
- Work Surroundings and Culture: The middle-class setting of many film and TV productions in the UK can be tough for working-class newcomers, leading to feelings of impostor syndrome despite talent and skill.
3.What are the impacts of declining arts education in state schools?
The trend of declining arts education in state schools has significant consequences:
- Reduced Enrollment: Since 2010, enrollment in arts GCSEs has dropped by 40%. The overall arts subject engagement at the GCSE level has declined dramatically, with only 24% of students taking arts subjects like music, design, and media in recent years.
- creativity Crisis: Known colloquially as the “creativity crisis,” this decline signifies fewer opportunities for young people to explore and cultivate their artistic talents during formative years.
- Long-term Effects: The absence of arts subjects can hinder the development of creativity and critical thinking skills,ultimately reducing the pool of future talent entering the creative industries.
4. How can the arts become more inclusive and accessible?
Efforts to increase accessibility and inclusivity in the arts involve:
- Scholarships and Mentorship Programs: Institutions like the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation provide scholarships and mentorships designed to support students from underrepresented backgrounds in pursuing arts careers.
- Diverse and Inclusive policies: Arts organizations are implementing training and practices aimed at fostering diversity. Programs by organizations like the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts focus on ensuring diverse representation within arts institutions.
- Government Support and Policies: Campaigns led by government bodies,such as statements by UK Culture secretary Lisa Nandy,highlight the importance of changing the story narrative to include diverse voices. Policies aimed at addressing socioeconomic barriers in the arts are crucial for fostering wider inclusion.
5. Why is diversity important in the arts industry?
Diversity in the arts holds several key benefits:
- Enhanced creativity and Innovation: Studies indicate that diverse groups are more innovative and creative, bringing new perspectives that enhance artistic output.
- Economic Performance: Organizations that embrace diversity also tend to perform better financially. As an example, McKinsey & Company reports that ethnically diverse companies perform 35% better financially.
- Reflecting Society: A diverse arts sector ensures a broader range of narratives and experiences are told, reflecting the true diversity of society and enriching cultural dialogues.
This article aims to provide thorough insights into the issues of elitism and access in the arts, shedding light on structural barriers and proposing solutions for fostering a more equitable and inclusive environment.
