X Loses High Court Challenge Against Media Commission
X Fails in high Court Challenge Against Ireland’s Online Safety Code
Table of Contents
Social media giant X, formerly known as Twitter, has lost a meaningful legal battle against Ireland’s broadcasting and online media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán, over its new Online Safety Code. The High Court has dismissed X’s challenge, upholding the regulator’s authority to implement legally binding rules for video-sharing platforms aimed at protecting the public, notably children, from harmful online content.
X’s Legal Stance and the Regulator’s Mandate
X International Unlimited Company had alleged “regulatory overreach” by Coimisiún na Meán,specifically targeting the regulator’s approach to restrictions on certain video content. The company sought a high Court order to quash the decision to adopt specific sections of the code and to overturn its application to the X platform.
The Online Safety Code, adopted last October and effective this month, establishes stringent rules for video-sharing platforms. Its primary objective is to enhance online safety and shield users, especially minors, from exposure to detrimental content.
high Court ruling: Upholding the Code’s Validity
In a decisive judgment, Mr Justice Conleth Bradley refused the reliefs sought by X.The judge systematically dismissed several arguments presented by the platform, including the assertion that the code was inconsistent with European legislation.
Mr Justice Bradley found that the code did not exceed the scope permitted by the Audiovisual Media Service Directive (AVMSD), a key European Union directive that forms the foundation of the code.Crucially, the judge steadfast that the code was not in conflict with the Digital Services Act (DSA), another significant EU regulation governing online content.
Complementary EU Legislation: AVMSD and DSA
The judge highlighted the complementary nature of the AVMSD and the DSA in the context of this case. He stated that the AVMSD is not superseded or substantially limited by the digital Services Act, contrary to X’s submissions.
The AVMSD, according to the judgment, works in tandem with the Digital Services Act by “providing specific rules in determining what content can be harmful to minors.” This interpretation directly addresses X’s contention that the code allowed for a total ban on certain online content, whereas X argued the directive only permitted measures to control access.
X’s arguments Dismissed
X had argued that Coimisiún na Meán, in adopting the contested sections of the safety code, had overstepped the bounds of the AVMSD. The platform maintained that the directive only sanctioned measures to control access to online content, not outright prohibitions. Furthermore, X contended that parts of the code encroached upon matters regulated by the Digital Services Act and were in conflict with its provisions.
Thes arguments were ultimately rejected by the High Court. The judgment is expected to be formalized later this week. Mr Justice Bradley indicated his intention to award costs in favour of Coimisiún na Meán, acknowledging the regulator’s complete success in defending the legal action.
This ruling signifies a victory for Ireland’s efforts to bolster online safety and reinforces the powers of its media regulator in an evolving digital landscape. While this specific challenge has concluded, further legal scrutiny and potential challenges over online regulation are anticipated.