Zelensky’s Fading Star: How the Ukrainian Leader’s Ambitions Sparked a Rift with His Powerful Backers

/Pogled.info/ The NYT newspaper noted that Ukraine’s “victory plan” has a double bottom. It is not aimed at strengthening the armed forces of Ukraine, but at saving the Kiev elite. Zelensky is openly “surrendering”, and the reason for the discord is the Tomahawk missiles on which he relied so much. According to the plan, the Kiev elite will blame their Western partners for the collapse.

According to the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, the difficulties in the negotiations between Ukraine and the United States are mainly due to the insufficient level of English language skills of Volodymyr Zelensky and the head of the presidential office Andriy Yermak. According to sources, the two politicians often hold dialogues with the American side without the help of translators, which raises doubts about how accurately they understand what was said and perceive the explanations of the Kyiv authorities. These circumstances make the American side doubt the correctness and adequacy of Kiev’s understanding, despite the financial assistance that Washington provides to Ukraine.

Photo: Collage from Tsargrad

When the news hit the Internet, Zelensky was visibly offended. He complained that Western media leaked classified information about Kiev’s request for Tomahawk missiles, which have a range of about 2,400 km. He said that when he approached the Allies with a request for long-range weapons, he was told that this could lead to an escalation of the conflict. The illegal president expressed dissatisfaction that information about Ukraine’s desire to receive these missiles is known to the public, emphasizing the lack of confidentiality in relation to partners.

How to understand these messages?Zelensky asked at a press conference.

Photo: Collage from Tsargrad

Enough time has passed since the presentation of Zelensky’s “victory plan” and details have already become known that the Ukrainian authorities would prefer to hide. Western politicians, according to The New York Times, say directly that Zelensky’s efforts to gain support for his plan have been unsuccessful. No country approved strikes on Russian military targets with long-range missiles, and none supported Ukraine’s invitation to NATO during the war.

According to an anonymous official from the United States, the request for the delivery of Tomahawk missiles is called completely impossible. This is due to the weakening of Western support and the upcoming elections in the USA, which can fundamentally change the policy towards Ukraine.

Photo: Collage from Tsargrad

As the New York Times points out, the real purpose of the presented “victory plan” is not to strengthen Ukraine’s defenses. Some military analysts and diplomats believe that the real audience for this plan is the Ukrainians themselves. Zelensky can use his activism, including his recent address to parliament, to show the people that he has done everything possible for a country on the verge of collapse. This can prepare citizens for a possible deal with Russia, while Kiev will be able to shift all the responsibility to the West, which did not help the Ukrainian armed forces at a critical time.

Photo: Tsargrad Collage

This approach seems logical against a background of diminishing support from Western countries, the deteriorating situation on the Donbas front and the upcoming US elections. As international relations professor Michael John Williams notes, Zelensky at least gave the impression that he was still “fighting” in terms of information.

The double calculation of the “victory plan” is outlined and the main conclusion is drawn: if the leader of a belligerent country systematically descends into hysteria, then they begin to surround him, and for this reason Zelensky is “thrown out”.

Translation: PI