AGO Explains Director of East Jakarta Role to Press Council
JAKTV News Director Suspected of Obstructing Justice in Tin,Sugar Import Cases
Table of Contents
- JAKTV News Director Suspected of Obstructing Justice in Tin,Sugar Import Cases
- JAKTV News director Under Investigation: Obstruction of justice Allegations Explained
- What is the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) investigating?
- What exactly is Tian Bahtiar accused of?
- Are these allegations related to journalistic reporting?
- Who else is involved in this case?
- What is the alleged role of the other suspects?
- How did tian Bahtiar allegedly obstruct justice?
- How much money did Bahtiar allegedly receive?
- What were the alleged goals of these actions?
- What specific cases are involved in this investigation?
- How does the Press Council view this investigation?
- summary of Allegations Against Tian Bahtiar
JAKARTA (AP) — The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) is investigating allegations that Tian Bahtiar,news director at JAKTV,interfered with probes into tin and sugar import cases. Attorney General St. Burhanuddin discussed the matter with Press Council Chairman Ninik Rahayu, according to AGO spokesman Harli Siregar on Tuesday.
Siregar stated that Burhanuddin detailed Tian’s alleged involvement in hindering investigations related to tin, imported sugar, and cooking oil raw material export corruption.
“The Attorney General provided explanations regarding the handling of these cases,” Siregar said.
Siregar emphasized that the investigation focuses on alleged collusion, not on journalistic reporting. ”The actions ascribed to those concerned were personal acts, not related to the media,” he said, adding that the AGO is not “anti-criticism.”
“What is questioned is the criminal offence of the alleged agreement between these parties to obstruct the ongoing legal process,” Siregar explained.
According to Siregar, the Press Council understands and respects the AGO’s investigation. ”The Press Council highly respects law enforcement. We also conveyed that we respect the Press Council’s ethical process and assessment of journalistic works,” he said.
Three Suspects named in Obstruction Case
The AGO has named three suspects in the obstruction of justice investigation:
- Marcella Santoso, lawyer
- Junaedi Saibih, lawyer
- Tian Bahtiar, JAKTV News Director
Tian Bahtiar’s Alleged Role
Abdul Qohar, Director of investigation at Jampidsus AGO, said Bahtiar is suspected of conspiring with Santoso and Saibih to disrupt the cases. Bahtiar allegedly used JAKTV news content to sway public opinion regarding the tin commodity corruption case in the PT pertamina IUP region and the sugar import case involving Tom Lembong.
Qohar stated that Bahtiar’s actions impacted the investigation, prosecution, and court proceedings.
Qohar alleged that Bahtiar received 478.5 million Indonesian Rupiah (approximately $30,000 USD) to create content that negatively portrayed the AGO. He claimed Bahtiar accepted orders from Santoso and Saibih to produce negative news about the AGO’s handling of the cases.
“The suspects ordered Bahtiar to make negative news and content that corners the prosecutor’s office related to the handling of the case,” Qohar said.”Bahtiar published it on social media and JAKTV News, so the prosecutor’s office is considered negative, and has harmed the rights of the suspect or defendant.”
Furthermore, Qohar claimed Bahtiar disseminated a false methodology for calculating state losses in the two cases through JAKTV news. He also allegedly supported efforts by Santoso and Saibih by covering demonstrations with negative narratives about the AGO.
Qohar added that Bahtiar allegedly created talk shows and panel discussions on campuses regarding the cases.
“The suspects held and financed seminars, podcasts, and talk shows… by directing negative narratives in the news to influence the proof of the case at the trial, then covered by Bahtiar and broadcast it through JAKTV,” Qohar said.
The AGO alleges that Bahtiar’s actions were an attempt to manipulate public opinion and disrupt investigators.
JAKTV News director Under Investigation: Obstruction of justice Allegations Explained
This article provides a comprehensive overview of the investigation against JAKTV News Director Tian Bahtiar, who is suspected of obstructing justice in tin and sugar import cases. We’ll delve into the allegations, the roles of the other suspects, and the potential ramifications of these actions.
What is the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) investigating?
The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) is investigating allegations that Tian Bahtiar, the news director at JAKTV, interfered wiht investigations into tin and sugar import cases. According to the article, the Attorney General St. Burhanuddin discussed the matter with the Press Council Chairman.
What exactly is Tian Bahtiar accused of?
Tian Bahtiar is accused of obstructing justice concerning investigations related to tin, imported sugar, and cooking oil raw material export corruption. he is suspected of conspiring with others to influence public opinion and disrupt the legal process.
No. the AGO clarified that the investigation focuses on alleged collusion and personal acts, not on journalistic reporting. According to AGO spokesman Harli Siregar, the actions attributed to the suspects are not related to the media’s role. The focus is on the alleged agreement to obstruct the legal process.
Who else is involved in this case?
Besides Tian Bahtiar, the AGO has named two other suspects in the obstruction of justice investigation:
Marcella Santoso, a lawyer
Junaedi Saibih, a lawyer
What is the alleged role of the other suspects?
The article states that Tian Bahtiar is thought to have worked in coordination with lawyers Marcella Santoso and Junaedi Saibih to disrupt the legal processes. They were allegedly attempting to sway public sentiment to influence the outcome of the court proceedings.
How did tian Bahtiar allegedly obstruct justice?
According to Abdul Qohar, the Director of Investigation at Jampidsus AGO, Tian Bahtiar used JAKTV news content to sway public opinion regarding the tin commodity corruption case and the sugar import case. His actions allegedly impacted the investigation, prosecution, and court proceedings.
Key actions Bahtiar allegedly took:
Published negative news and content about the AGO on JAKTV News and social media.
Disseminated a false methodology for calculating state losses through JAKTV news.
Supported efforts by Santoso and Saibih by covering demonstrations with negative narratives about the AGO.
Created talk shows and panel discussions on campuses regarding the cases.
How much money did Bahtiar allegedly receive?
Tian Bahtiar allegedly received 478.5 million Indonesian Rupiah (approximately $30,000 USD) to create content that negatively portrayed the AGO. This content was intended to undermine the AGO’s handling of the cases and influence public opinion.
What were the alleged goals of these actions?
The AGO alleges that Bahtiar’s actions were an attempt to manipulate public opinion and disrupt investigators. The aim was to benefit the suspects or defendants in the tin and sugar import cases by swaying public sentiment and undermining the AGO’s work.
What specific cases are involved in this investigation?
The cases mentioned in the article:
Tin commodity corruption case in the PT Pertamina IUP region
Sugar import case involving Tom Lembong
How does the Press Council view this investigation?
The article states that the press Council understands and respects the AGO’s investigation.They also acknowledge the AGO’s right to law enforcement, while emphasizing the importance of ethical processes in journalism.
summary of Allegations Against Tian Bahtiar
Here is a summary of the key allegations against Tian Bahtiar:
| Allegation | Description |
| ————————————————- | ———————————————————————————————————————————————— |
| Obstructing Justice | Interfered with investigations related to tin, imported sugar, and cooking oil raw material export corruption. |
| Conspiring with Others | Allegedly worked with lawyers Marcella Santoso and Junaedi Saibih.|
| Manipulating Public Opinion | Used JAKTV news content to sway public opinion regarding the cases. |
| Disseminating False Data | Spread a false methodology for calculating state losses. |
| Creating Negative Content | Created content that negatively portrayed the AGO, possibly harming the rights of the accused. |
| Receiving Financial Compensation | Received approximately $30,000 USD to create negative news and content. |
| Influencing Legal Proceedings | Aimed to influence the proof of the case at trial by directing negative narratives in the news. |