Artificial intelligence has moved beyond theoretical discussion and into the realm of tangible disruption, impacting not only the technology sector but also prompting a reassessment of investment strategies and the very nature of work. Recent events, including a sophisticated AI-generated fabrication and a wave of resignations from key figures in the AI research community, are signaling a shift in perception – from cautious optimism to a more urgent reckoning with the technology’s potential consequences.
The immediacy of the change was brought into sharp focus for one journalist last week with the circulation of a completely fabricated story detailing a confrontation between the author and a prominent Australian banker. The 2,000-word article, complete with fabricated images, demonstrated the increasing sophistication of AI-driven disinformation and the challenges in discerning authentic information. This incident underscores a growing concern: the erosion of trust in media and the potential for AI to manipulate public perception.
Compounding this concern, a detailed essay published on by Matt Shumer, co-founder of an AI company in New York City, articulated a sense of acceleration in AI development. Shumer described a “click” moment – a realization that AI’s capabilities were rapidly surpassing expectations. He noted that he is now able to simply describe the technical work he requires, and the AI delivers the result, effectively rendering his technical skills redundant. This sentiment is echoed by reports of autonomous vehicles, such as those operated by Tesla, already capable of navigating complex routes without human intervention, though legal restrictions currently limit their widespread deployment.
AI wake-up call
The past week has been marked by a series of events highlighting the accelerating pace of AI development and the growing anxieties surrounding its implications. The simultaneous release of GPT-5.3 Codex from OpenAI and Opus 4.6 from Anthropic served as a catalyst, prompting a reassessment of AI’s potential impact on the job market and corporate strategies.
Further fueling these concerns, Anthropic released plug-ins for its Claude Cowork AI designed to automate professional tasks, initially targeting back-office functions within law firms. This announcement triggered a sell-off in the shares of software and data companies, including Salesforce, Thompson Reuters, and Adobe, as well as Australian firms like Technology One, Xero, and Wisetech, reflecting investor apprehension about the potential for widespread automation.
The emergence of MiniCPM-o 4.5, an open-source AI agent developed by a Chinese lab, adds another layer of complexity. Its ability to run on personal devices, eliminating the need for large data centers, raises questions about the massive investments previously directed towards building and maintaining such infrastructure.
The resignations of key AI researchers are also adding to the sense of unease. Mrinank Sharma, head of safeguard research at Anthropic, resigned on , citing concerns about a series of interconnected global crises and a perceived failure to prioritize ethical considerations in AI development. He expressed a desire to focus on “courageous speech” and the pursuit of wisdom alongside technological advancement. Similarly, Jimmy Ba, a co-founder of xAI, Elon Musk’s AI venture, also resigned, predicting an era of “100x productivity” driven by recursive self-improvement loops in AI, and suggesting will be a pivotal year for the future of humanity.
Adding to the chorus of warnings, Mustafa Suleyman, head of AI at Microsoft and a founder of Google’s DeepMind, stated that most white-collar jobs involving computer work – including those of lawyers, accountants, project managers, and marketing professionals – will be fully automated within the next .
How will investors respond?
The realization that artificial intelligence is progressing more rapidly than anticipated is now dawning on investors. The releases from Anthropic on and were pivotal moments in shifting market sentiment, triggering what analysts are calling “AI fear.”
The fundamental shift occurring is not merely about cost reduction and increased productivity, although those factors are undeniably significant. AI represents a fundamental restructuring of the relationship between labor and capital, potentially reversing centuries of progress since the abolition of slavery. The decreasing cost of intelligence, akin to the dramatic reduction in communication costs following the advent of the internet, is incentivizing companies to prioritize capital investment over labor costs.
However, the implications extend far beyond economic considerations. The development of an “alien intelligence” – one that surpasses human cognitive abilities in speed, knowledge, and evolutionary capacity – presents profound challenges. The current moment may represent a turning point, marking not simply another industrial revolution, but a fundamentally new era with unprecedented and potentially unpredictable consequences.
