Beijing Slams West’s Criticism of Hong Kong Activists’ Sentencing

Beijing criticized Western reactions to the sentencing of Benny Tai Yiu-ting and other activists in Hong Kong. The Chinese government accused foreign nations of using “hypocritical double standards.” It stated that these activists are not true advocates for democracy but rather destroyers of it.

The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office expressed that the activists’ actions threatened the nation and harmed the interests of Hongkongers. The office also promised support to Hong Kong judges amid calls for sanctions from some Western leaders.

In an unusual move, the agency shared its comments on WeChat, using the pen name “Gang Ao Ping,” in both Chinese and English. It dismissed Western critiques as a “smear campaign” based on lies and bias.

What are the implications of Beijing’s stance on the judicial independence in Hong Kong?

Interview with Dr. Li Wei, Political Analyst and Hong Kong Specialist

NewsDirectory3: Thank you for joining us, Dr. Li. Let’s begin with the recent comments from Beijing regarding the sentencing of Benny Tai and other activists. How significant is the Chinese government’s reaction to these events?

Dr. Li Wei: Thank you for having me. The Chinese government’s reaction is highly significant as it underscores their unwavering stance on Hong Kong and the implications of protests. By labeling the activists as “destroyers” of democracy, Beijing seeks to assert that their actions disrupt the stability and security of the region, hence justifying stringent measures to maintain control.

NewsDirectory3: What do you make of the accusation that Western nations are employing “hypocritical double standards”?

Dr. Li Wei: This accusation reflects a broader narrative that China often employs — framing international criticism as unequal and biased. From Beijing’s perspective, it views these Western nations as hypocritical for condemning China’s actions while not addressing similar issues within their own borders. This strategy aims to divert attention from their domestic policies and consolidate support among nationalistic sentiments.

NewsDirectory3: The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office emphasized support for local judges in light of calls for sanctions. What does this indicate about the Chinese government’s approach to judicial independence in Hong Kong?

Dr. Li Wei: This indicates a troubling trend where the Chinese government aims to exert influence over Hong Kong’s judiciary. By openly supporting judges, they are signaling that they expect the local judiciary to align with central government policies, thus potentially undermining the principle of judicial independence. This could lead to a chilling effect on legal proceedings related to dissent.

NewsDirectory3: The office’s comments on WeChat, using the pen name “Gang Ao Ping” to communicate in both Chinese and English, was noteworthy. What impact does this have on China’s communication strategy?

Dr. Li Wei: This dual-language approach signifies a strategic effort to directly engage with both domestic and international audiences. By using a social media platform like WeChat, they tap into a massive audience while attempting to shape global narratives about Hong Kong. It also reflects a pragmatic understanding of the importance of framing their perspective amidst international scrutiny.

NewsDirectory3: do you think these actions will adversely affect the perception of Hong Kong on the world stage, or are they likely to unify local support for the Chinese government?

Dr. Li Wei: It will likely create a dual effect. Internationally, these actions may lead to increased skepticism and condemnation from Western countries, further isolating Hong Kong politically. Conversely, within some segments of the local population, Beijing’s firm stance against perceived foreign interference could reinforce support for the government. Ultimately, it will depend on how the situation evolves in response to ongoing local and global pressures.

NewsDirectory3: Thank you, Dr. Li, for your insights on this complex and evolving issue.

The office claimed that Tai and others acted as tools for outside forces to incite a “colour revolution” in Hong Kong. They argued that these activists spread harmful ideas that contributed to the 2019 protests against the government.